Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ThePhilosopher04

(1,732 posts)
1. Like I've stated before. Whatever she did or didn't say in the speeches is irrelevant.
Wed Apr 13, 2016, 04:49 AM
Apr 2016

She took the money and is on the payroll. She could talk about making ham sandwiches for all I care, she's been bought and paid for. I'm sure she's said some incriminating things that need to be brought to light, but that would only be icing on the cake. But I think we need to focus less on what's in the transcripts and more on the acquisition of influence.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Do you suppose attendees ...»Reply #1