Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Whoa! What's going on here this morning? Another feigned outrage I see. [View all]WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)63. We're breaking through some double standards in 2016
Remember when we only commented about a woman's hair, face, attire (did we make fat jokes about female candidates?).
All of those double standards came crashing down this year. Everyone is fair game.
But we're not ready for media whore. Too soon.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Whoa! What's going on here this morning? Another feigned outrage I see. [View all]
Avalux
Apr 2016
OP
You certainly don't. You can say all the offensive things that you want, and Bernie can't stop you.
DanTex
Apr 2016
#4
well, there are rules on this board. so I can't say what I really feel about Hillary
2pooped2pop
Apr 2016
#5
But there are no rules at Bernie rallies. Everyone gets to see the nastiness and the smears.
DanTex
Apr 2016
#13
I'm not too worried about it, after all, my candidate's going to win the nomination.
DanTex
Apr 2016
#83
Somehow I doubt you really give any fucks about that and only hoped it would hurt her.
JTFrog
Apr 2016
#62
Question: Do you get an extra nickel if you're the first one to reply to an OP?
TheBlackAdder
Apr 2016
#124
The term has such a distinctive and well known meaning and used so often it is definable
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#42
It was used in a political context, stop pretending to be dumb, I know you aren't. /nt
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#53
I actually am sure, the poster is often disingenuous, but I do not think him/her stupid /nt
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#108
LOL, I disagree that one can not be disingenuous without also being stupid, but I agree
Dragonfli
Apr 2016
#117
I believe that the word is appropriate for those who sell themselves for money,
bvar22
Apr 2016
#136
This coming from Camp Sanders, who needs a fainting couch for "CP Time", is pretty funny
Tarc
Apr 2016
#16
So, according to you and "many black people", anyone can use that term any time they want? nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2016
#99
I didn't ask President Obama. I asked you. Please answer my question. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2016
#103
I'm unable to figure it out? Is that your shady way of calling me stupid? Is it ok or not...
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2016
#107
I know what the fuck context is. So you're saying it's ok for some and not ok for others. So, is...
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2016
#111
Guess you didn't hear. Bernie himself had the sense to disavow that disrespectful crap
brush
Apr 2016
#19
He did the right thing. Dems should not be using that kind of language towards other dems
brush
Apr 2016
#58
Then tell your friends to stop complaining about it. The rally was fantastic.
bkkyosemite
Apr 2016
#31
Corporate whores are corporate whores. And I really miss mediawhoresonline.com. n/t
ieoeja
Apr 2016
#47
It's a distraction from the new offshoring report, everyone's involved in except Bernie!
ViseGrip
Apr 2016
#34
They kind of wore out the Papal Poutrage and had to come up with something.
nichomachus
Apr 2016
#79
Your post should be read by all objectors to the "corporate whore" phrase and then
ladjf
Apr 2016
#84
Yes it is getting tiring, that every day they come up with some new outrage to deflect
pdsimdars
Apr 2016
#93
A term that has been thrown around this site for years, is suddenly offensive.
Fuddnik
Apr 2016
#105