Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

katsy

(4,246 posts)
18. How is manufacturing goods in one country
Sat Apr 16, 2016, 04:34 PM
Apr 2016

and shipping goods across the world in containers that aren't reused for the most part good for the planet?

Clue: it's not.

Corporations should produce the goods and sell them to the market where they are produced.

But the corporate whore politicians sold out their constituencies & the environment, and enabled corporations to make obscene amounts of profit on the backs of wage slaves.

No one has been lifted out of poverty. Wage slaves making a dollar or 2 or 10 a day isn't lifting people out of poverty when there's no clear hope or path to a better future. Labor has no seat at the free trade table. It's modern day feudalism.

And since the fuck when should I, as a taxpayer, be on the hook for perceived profit losses should our regulations stand in the path or a corporation selling their shit to us. Are you fucking kidding me.

Yea ask all the countries that are being sued for wanting to put warnings on packs of cigarettes. It won't happen here but it's happening around the world. Countries are being sued for trying to protect their citizens v

Our government has no fucking business enabling the profits of any corporation. Government used to be in the business of protecting the people.

Fresh_Start I pray for you and your excellent post. You will be slammed for being a globalist, Hoyt Apr 2016 #1
I know that I was concerned about the backlash. Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #3
THIS OP IS NOT A LIBERAL VIEW POINT Zira Apr 2016 #66
It's not even a viewpoint capable of counting to 10. JackRiddler Apr 2016 #98
Not a neo-liberal one though Armstead Apr 2016 #91
Is it liberal to lack arithmetic? JackRiddler Apr 2016 #97
SO we are supposed to shut up and accept the race to the bottom Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #90
You are supposed to quit treating poor foreign workers like scabs and competition. Hoyt Apr 2016 #92
America First Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #93
Yep America First and Nationalism, screw the rest of world we are the "greedy 1%ers of the world." Hoyt Apr 2016 #95
Ubsurd excuse for the Race to the bottom Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #96
"Race to bottom" and other such BS is just dog whistle against poor foreign workers. Hoyt Apr 2016 #99
World population growth is out of control... Blanks Apr 2016 #102
"Trade agreements in spite of their ugly local side effects are good for the worlds populations." Scuba Apr 2016 #2
let's ask the people in India, Philippines hill2016 Apr 2016 #6
Let's see someone in India get's a $3/day job at the expense of someone in the USA who loses ... Scuba Apr 2016 #10
I really don't think your numbers work hill2016 Apr 2016 #12
Nationalism at its ugliest. If in fact an Indian is getting $3/day, it damn sure is better than Hoyt Apr 2016 #25
So you support the Race to the Bottom. No surprise there Hoyt. None at all. Scuba Apr 2016 #29
So you see poor people wlling to work for a better life as competition and scabs. Hoyt Apr 2016 #38
Whoooose. Scuba Apr 2016 #43
It's certainly a boon for the Indian guy who was previously making 20 cents a day Recursion Apr 2016 #57
You seem like a bright guy so I'm pretty sure you can understand this ... Scuba Apr 2016 #72
Only if by that you mean "white working people" Recursion Apr 2016 #75
It's a net loss for working people. Your attempt to suggest it's racist is noted, however. Scuba Apr 2016 #80
Nope. *net* income and wages are up Recursion Apr 2016 #81
In the example I used in the thread, net income for working people is NOT up. Period. Scuba Apr 2016 #83
Yes, it is Recursion Apr 2016 #84
No. Income drops from $240.20 per day to $3.00 per day. If you think that's higher ... Scuba Apr 2016 #85
OMG! Recursion Apr 2016 #86
OMG! Series? Scuba Apr 2016 #88
That's because your example is a *complete lie* Recursion Apr 2016 #89
Your example assumes it takes 100 Indians to replace one American worker. Scuba Apr 2016 #101
A typical call center worker in the Philippines makes about $500-700 per month. DCBob Apr 2016 #76
Yup. Hyderabad call center wages are about $800 per month Recursion Apr 2016 #78
For sure there are problems with outsourcing but clearly some are benefiting. DCBob Apr 2016 #87
Agree Ferd Berfel Apr 2016 #94
No need to go to India. You can ask H1B Indians R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #11
Free Trade agreements do not help with the poverty around the world. FAIR TRADE agreements do. jillan Apr 2016 #4
Did I say "free" trade agreements? Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #13
You Hillarites thought long and hard on this one. nice try litlbilly Apr 2016 #19
They're profoundly ignorant because they don't google and find out anything. Zira Apr 2016 #65
Not being in the "middle class" I can only say that Downwinder Apr 2016 #5
Exactly, they bind countries together in ways that go far beyond trade. Hoyt Apr 2016 #26
2nd in North America alone. mmonk Apr 2016 #7
Just a coinky-dink that these trade deals enrich Hillary's donors, I guess? nt Romulox Apr 2016 #8
That's just an unintended consequence. Wilms Apr 2016 #22
Your third grade sophistry is duly noted. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #9
I didn't say "Free Trade" Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #14
Which just adds to your third grade sophistry. R. Daneel Olivaw Apr 2016 #17
Thank you! cheapdate Apr 2016 #55
Nafta went from one country to the next using the cheapest labor they could Zira Apr 2016 #67
How is manufacturing goods in one country katsy Apr 2016 #18
Containers are not reused? Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #35
Tons of container waste in S.F. & they're starting katsy Apr 2016 #45
You said they are not reused Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #48
Google is your friend katsy Apr 2016 #52
Thank you. Re: your last paragraph - especially not at the jwirr Apr 2016 #46
that is what they are called whether you said it or not. litlbilly Apr 2016 #20
People are being exploited around the azmom Apr 2016 #15
sources? citations? It's not true just because someone says it on the internet Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #16
There are studies by numerous governments and many academics Fresh_Start Apr 2016 #21
Agree, AND it's also not necessarily true even if said on TV either!! eom Karma13612 Apr 2016 #74
Funny, you're the same person who posted this: BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #23
Of course they are the same. TM99 Apr 2016 #31
Your concern is noted krawhitham Apr 2016 #24
"You make $40k and have insurance RadiationTherapy Apr 2016 #27
The "trade" agreements are meant to bring most of us down to that worldwide poverty level, with the djean111 Apr 2016 #28
I soundly reject your neoliberalism TM99 Apr 2016 #30
Well said A Little Weird Apr 2016 #32
^^This!!^^ dana_b Apr 2016 #33
This company pays workers $6.00 per day in Mexico. azmom Apr 2016 #44
I just got off the phone TM99 Apr 2016 #47
Besides, it costs more to live in the US, especially in the COLD north! raging moderate Apr 2016 #82
The US is 4.4% of the world population. So an American with an average income is definitely not jfern Apr 2016 #34
You need an income of 40k per year Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #36
VERY attainable for MANY Americans. Hiraeth Apr 2016 #37
40,000 is attainable for many americans Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #39
40,000 is attainable for many americans. bullshit. eom Hiraeth Apr 2016 #41
More than half make 50k or more. That is many americans. Travis_0004 Apr 2016 #49
Individual or Total household Income? either way the 40k jobs of the future. where are they? Hiraeth Apr 2016 #50
So very out of touch.... haikugal Apr 2016 #53
bubbles inside of bubbles. insulated and insular Hiraeth Apr 2016 #54
It's over $100k to be global 1% jfern Apr 2016 #42
No, it's $34K for a single individual Recursion Apr 2016 #58
$34k sounds way too low to be 80th percentile in the US jfern Apr 2016 #59
For an individual earner that sounds about right; median is $25K or so Recursion Apr 2016 #60
Household income probably makes more sense jfern Apr 2016 #63
Exploitative trade agreements are not good for workers of any country. n/t Skwmom Apr 2016 #40
Grab a dictionary..... daleanime Apr 2016 #51
You basicaally just said the middle class if fine, because others are worse. Idiot. Joob Apr 2016 #56
Oh look, more "opposing free trade makes you a racist" horseshit. Odin2005 Apr 2016 #61
More Hillarians being beyond uninformed. Zira Apr 2016 #68
Republican policies. Republican rationalization. nt vintx Apr 2016 #77
Ahh fuck, not this bullshit again. 99Forever Apr 2016 #62
How UNINFORMED can you get? I'm guessing you are a HILLARIAN because this is so bad. Zira Apr 2016 #64
I have not been proud of DU much lately.... senseandsensibility Apr 2016 #69
It's not good My Good Babushka Apr 2016 #70
If you really cared about the worlds poor TheFarS1de Apr 2016 #71
No. I think the Western middle class is in the top 80% to 95% globally, not the top 1%. pampango Apr 2016 #73
Yeah but there's so many ways to measure that it gets meaningless Recursion Apr 2016 #79
This is a national election with international implications but, there is NO NEED, at this time, to Hiraeth Apr 2016 #100
Yes, we should be concerned about other human beings notadmblnd Apr 2016 #103
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The US middle class is in...»Reply #18