The superdelegates endorsement of HRC so early in the process has been used to get (Reply #40)

In the discussion thread: If you don't think having your registration mysteriously switched, [View all]

Wed Apr 20, 2016, 10:06 AM

40. The superdelegates endorsement of HRC so early in the process has been used to get

much more support for HRC than she would have received from voters otherwise.

They made it so that the media could claim she was inevitable from the very beginning. You don't understand human psychology if you don't get how that garnered support from regular voters for HRC throughout this entire primary process.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

55 replies	Author	Time	Post
If you don't think having your registration mysteriously switched, [View all]	onecaliberal	Apr 2016	OP
I remember back during 2000 and 2004, those things used to matter to Dems.	vintx	Apr 2016	#1
I seriously can't believe I'm seeing dems support the same republican tactics	onecaliberal	Apr 2016	#4
And dems using the same responses republicans use	vintx	Apr 2016	#8
These people are not democrats. Look at the national platform.	onecaliberal	Apr 2016	#9
And this very site was created because Bush stole the election from Gore in 2000.	Punkingal	Apr 2016	#20
One Party... "$THE MONEY PARTY$!	CorporatistNation	Apr 2016	#32
I had my voting location changed, I did not allow tbis to keep me from voting.	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#2
"Bully for you", as Teddy would say. But the lack of compassion, empathy, and ability to fight for	highprincipleswork	Apr 2016	#3
I believe in justice, what are you implying. I have heard this more than once	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#6
I am sure you do. And we should all be concerned, in my opinion, with voting irregularities. Next	highprincipleswork	Apr 2016	#13
This was a primary, this was not a general election, choices of party was made, this is	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#29
If you don't think having your registration mysteriously switched...	highprincipleswork	Apr 2016	#42
As I stated previously I have also had my voting precinct changed, went to the place I was to vote a	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#43
Next time?	nadinbrzezinski	Apr 2016	#45
It is a disgusting mess. We would never advocate for this process in another "democracy".	highprincipleswork	Apr 2016	#46
Of course not	nadinbrzezinski	Apr 2016	#47
Damn straight.	dinkytron	Apr 2016	#16
Did you risk losing your job	Ghost Dog	Apr 2016	#18
No, I did not risk my job, it happened I was off on primary day. I sought the information before	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#44
Then, you'd appreciate that others might have had to abandon	Ghost Dog	Apr 2016	#53
I do realize the time constraints. I did not run around complaining about this, running elections	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#55
They don't care about Democracy. They care about their damn Party.	notadmblnd	Apr 2016	#5
Yes, we the people have voted 2.7 m more votes for Hillary, we care about democracy,	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#7
I wasn't disputing what democracy is	notadmblnd	Apr 2016	#10
Democracy is not the 2.7 who voted, but about the hundreds of	flor-de-jasmim	Apr 2016	#11
This was a primary election, it was not a general election, there is a difference.	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#23
Yeah,don't go into the details..	Adrahil	Apr 2016	#28
Yes, I know, hopefully some will come away with new information.	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#31
you can vote for the candidate of your choice in the general election -IF YOU ARE smart enuff	msongs	Apr 2016	#12
...	Voice for Peace	Apr 2016	#14
I would think it were terribly wrong ...	nolawarlock	Apr 2016	#15
Those who have to cheat to win are losers.	Waiting For Everyman	Apr 2016	#17
Just as caucuses "cheats" the senior and disabled.	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#24
Interesting thread, in the context that Bernie was on TV last week saying	PBass	Apr 2016	#19
He's also said he's willing to try to flip pledged delegates, on the theory that the most important	pnwmom	Apr 2016	#22
But it was okay for Hillary to buy up super-delegates before a single vote was cast.	djean111	Apr 2016	#37
The superdelegates endorsement of HRC so early in the process has been used to get	stillwaiting	Apr 2016	#40
Hillary and Bill have been meeting super delegates for months. There's NOTHING wrong	Zira	Apr 2016	#54
Not all those problems are of the same level of problem. And you could make similar	pnwmom	Apr 2016	#21
Exactly, caucuses left out the seniors and disabled. It was a primary election, republicans	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#26
Hmmm...	Agschmid	Apr 2016	#25
Very true.	Thinkingabout	Apr 2016	#27
All those things are A-OK as long as they benefit Hillary	EmperorHasNoClothes	Apr 2016	#30
A million Democrats figured out how to vote for Hillary Clinton yesterday...	brooklynite	Apr 2016	#33
Democracy left us a long time ago.	smiley	Apr 2016	#34
Voters have been complacent and don't vote.	WhiteTara	Apr 2016	#52
You think it's bad automated, you should have voted back when it was all on paper. Talk about	Hoyt	Apr 2016	#35
Think back to the 2000 election and all the fraud. Who would have thought.......	Skwmom	Apr 2016	#36
It's unbelievable. The disturbing thing is that supposed dems are doing it and supporting it.	onecaliberal	Apr 2016	#38
It is. n/t	Skwmom	Apr 2016	#39
Yes. The Establishment. It makes it clear why Dems did not change things when they had power. nt	stillwaiting	Apr 2016	#41
My 30 something friend couldn't vote yesterday.	redwitch	Apr 2016	#48
Why in hell would her affiliation be dropped because she changed her name. Complete ridiculousness.	onecaliberal	Apr 2016	#50
I know!	redwitch	Apr 2016	#51
K&R	lagomorph777	Apr 2016	#49

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.