2016 Postmortem

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)

80. there are numbers that demonstate that HRC supporters differ in voting rights issues

Reply to silvershadow (Reply #75)

Thu Apr 21, 2016, 04:49 PM

Apr 2016

from Sanders supporters, and these differences are statistically significant?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

120 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I hate this spin that Clinton supporters don't care about voting irregularities [View all] La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 OP

I think there is a willful misconstruing of the Primary Process Sheepshank Apr 2016 #1

i hate a lot of the rules, but most of them have been around for a long ass time La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #3

The endless campaigning is wearing and creates much hate and discontent IMHO Sheepshank Apr 2016 #8

vote counting by blackboxes favors hc too questionseverything Apr 2016 #9

I agree but I see nothing wrong with same day registration. floriduck Apr 2016 #38

i am ambivalent about same day registration, but it's not a huge sticking point with me La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #40

Actually the six months rule was to change party affiliation, voter registration did not Thinkingabout Apr 2016 #55

right. and people who work on saturdays. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #61

And caregivers, and people who don't have transportation.. LisaM Apr 2016 #107

It's a cross between WILLFUL misconstruing, and having the attitude that anyone should be MADem Apr 2016 #13

How do you justify the Big Tent concept. floriduck Apr 2016 #42

I think of it as... JSup Apr 2016 #67

I understand and agree with you. But the post I responded to it elitist in nature. floriduck Apr 2016 #71

the spin is EVERY SINGLE vote allegedly "lost" is direct fraud against sanders, committed personally msongs Apr 2016 #2

i find this sort of extrapolation to be dangerous because it willfully La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #5

Wanna join a party? apcalc Apr 2016 #41

Many of them don't. NY has crappy election rules, always has. Her supporters on DU celebrate that. Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #4

Who is celebrating crappy NY election rules around here?` apnu Apr 2016 #10

where do you see celebration that new york has crappy rules? La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #11

So you think you should get to vote but people who don't agree with you shouldn't. onecaliberal Apr 2016 #82

what are you talking about? at which point did i say people who dont agree with me shouldnt get to La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #85

You said you agree with closed primaries. What exactly do you think those do? They keep indies onecaliberal Apr 2016 #97

such hyperbole. I do believe in closed primaries, because if you care enough to vote in the primary La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #98

You care enough to keep other people from voting and don't bother with the reply I know where you onecaliberal Apr 2016 #99

actually when people vote my candidate wins (note caucus turnouts are notoriously low, which is La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #103

Note: She LOSES in EVERY SINGLE open primary with the exception of Texas, and they damn onecaliberal Apr 2016 #105

that's not accurate La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #109

Nancy Reagan brush Apr 2016 #12

Sorry no it was Ron and Nancy both that she lavished with praise. The quote: Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #24

could you show what you mean by cheered? La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #29

Look it up yourself, I'm not your gofer. None of them objected, not one had anything to say except Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #48

lol. i thought as much. she's trying to be nice, is so far away from cheered La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #50

How absurd. Like someone used forceps to pluck the Bernie-Victims from the lists. MADem Apr 2016 #14

And what did I say that contradicts that, MAD? Nothing. You are off topic. What I said is that her Bluenorthwest Apr 2016 #32

Yeah, they care so "little" they are at the forefront of actually DOING SOMETHING about it. MADem Apr 2016 #6

Also a bunch of Democrats in NY already are sounding alarm bells and investigations into the matter. apnu Apr 2016 #7

Given the demographic makeup, it is likely the lion's share of those lost votes would have gone to MADem Apr 2016 #15

it's also unlikely that more than 5-10% of those on the purged list geek tragedy Apr 2016 #18

I live in Brooklyn, so when out of state Standers geek tragedy Apr 2016 #16

i live here too La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #17

We didn't see that happening in Wisconsin or Michigan geek tragedy Apr 2016 #21

one trump vote? what district is this? La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #22

CD9, border of Prospect Heights and Crown Heights geek tragedy Apr 2016 #44

Their "concern" is new, because white people may be affected. nt LexVegas Apr 2016 #19

Lot of truth in that. Hoyt Apr 2016 #20

well most of the alleged probs did occur in the "south"....south NY lol nt msongs Apr 2016 #27

Ding, ding, ding...and you win the prize. all american girl Apr 2016 #28

This. Starry Messenger Apr 2016 #79

Yeah right. smiley Apr 2016 #112

Don't forget all the white people in AZ. frylock Apr 2016 #117

The why didn't the Clintons stand up for Blacks purged in Florida in 2000? Skwmom Apr 2016 #23

you're saying the demographic she is winning the most, is the one she want to disenfranchise La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #31

Madam Secretary, you didn't answer the question. frylock Apr 2016 #118

That's been their ploy all along. How can one be against economic justice, healthcare for all, etc. Hoyt Apr 2016 #25

They don't care, and won't until November. Who will help her? ViseGrip Apr 2016 #26

i literally have no idea what you are talking about. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #30

I am still heartbroken about 2004. Xyzse Apr 2016 #51

In Brooklyn it is likely Hillary's voters were more disenfranchised considering hrmjustin Apr 2016 #33

While I think that's unfair and far too broad-brush... Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #34

let me ask you, how many BERNIE voters were crying after Michigan and voting irregularities there? La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #35

*sigh* Lizzie Poppet Apr 2016 #49

so because i asked you a similar question, i must not be able to recognize civil agreement La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #52

can you link us up to some of MI voting iregularities? were they as massive as NY's? azurnoir Apr 2016 #69

sure La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #72

so ballot shortages that's it? no voter purges the ballots were apparently azurnoir Apr 2016 #95

I agree Dem2 Apr 2016 #36

Oh DO you? Then why y'all calling us paranoid, CT, excuse-making & LOLing at us? senz Apr 2016 #37

what are you talking about? who should i get this story straight with? my cabal of hillary voters La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #39

They don't call them 'Voting irregularities' AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #43

oh you again. no, that's not true. and after our conversation yesterday La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #45

I can post op after op after op if you wish AgingAmerican Apr 2016 #46

you can do whatever you want but a person who doesn't acknowledge that HRC is winning POC by large La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #47

Barack Obama has been President for eight years... Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #53

so now it's not even HRC, it's obama too? his justice department constantly defended the VRA La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #54

I said effectively. As in lead this nationally, made it an issue, campaign finance reform, the whole Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #70

posts like this is how you end up losing the black vote by the way La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #88

I absolutely don't care about "the black vote". Bread and Circus Apr 2016 #114

sorry but your fellow Hillary supporters think it is a Bernie supporter conspiracy theory because he m-lekktor Apr 2016 #56

^^^this desmiller Apr 2016 #59

not this at all. nt La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #63

I'm sorry but i think you created this OP to play around with us Berners. desmiller Apr 2016 #64

what do you mean to play around with you? La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #65

Like you replied "not this" when I agree with m-lekktor. desmiller Apr 2016 #66

ok. I'll link you to a couple of articles that somewhat reflect my views La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #76

A fair question with a fair answer. desmiller Apr 2016 #89

there is a great study called 'the emotional dog and its rational tail' by jonathan haidt La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #91

Sounds like a good read. thx. desmiller Apr 2016 #94

the conspiracy part is where you extrapolate from voting issues to explain why bernie lost La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #62

126,000 Registered Voters in Brooklyn ALONE were scrubbed from the rolls and were unable to sabrina 1 Apr 2016 #57

do you know what winning a county means? a large amount of space does not mean a large number of La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #60

Well the "not popular" lady just won, resoundingly. Lucinda Apr 2016 #74

No, she didn't win. When hundreds of thousands of voters are denied the right to vote, that is not sabrina 1 Apr 2016 #90

The Times article posits that Hillary was actually most hurt by the voting problems, not Bernie Lucinda Apr 2016 #93

I'm sure they did. Facts however are a different issue. Tens of thousands of Bernie supporters, more sabrina 1 Apr 2016 #96

First AZ and now NY doing serious investigations nadinbrzezinski Apr 2016 #77

They are losing and lashing out. JoePhilly Apr 2016 #58

Based on empirical evidence, it isn't spin. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #68

what empirical evidence? La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #73

It is all out there in the public domain. Look for it. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #75

there are numbers that demonstate that HRC supporters differ in voting rights issues La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #80

Several Hillary supporters have been vigorously defending the "nothing to see here" meme to me. lagomorph777 Apr 2016 #78

The comptroller, the mayor, and the AG are all Hillary supporters too. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #81

I thought you were referring to Hillary people on DU, who appear to be just fine with irregularities lagomorph777 Apr 2016 #83

i disagree with the premise of this, but no I was talking about HRC supporters overall La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #84

Well I hope the vast majority out there are different than the ones in here. lagomorph777 Apr 2016 #86

the entire democratic party is against voter disenfranchisement La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #87

You must have missed all those posts then. Marrah_G Apr 2016 #92

it's part of a theme: The presumed Presidency of Hillary Clinton: The end of LIfe as we we know it. Bill USA Apr 2016 #100

You may hate it, but it isn't spin artislife Apr 2016 #101

no, it is spin. the spin part comes when you guys think you would have won with the votes that were La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #102

Way to get your OP numbers up, answering each post artislife Apr 2016 #104

so i should not have answered each question/accusation? what a BS accusation. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #106

I am Latina artislife Apr 2016 #108

your accusations/narrative are completely off topic. you should and can vote for the person you La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #110

You are who I think of artislife Apr 2016 #111

"I hate this spin that Clinton supporters don't care about voting irregularities" Aerows Apr 2016 #113

The party made many of the rules that enforce disenfranchisement. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2016 #115

I guess post after post after post of roffle smilies in response to concerns.. frylock Apr 2016 #116

In 2009, Democrats in DC had an opportunity to protect our elections and voting rights. Scuba Apr 2016 #119

Of course, they care that they work flawlessly and remain largely unprovable. nt NorthCarolina Apr 2016 #120