Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)WHO Is To Blame? [View all]
If you had to choose, WHO would you blame (directly or indirectly) for Al Gore losing the 2000 presidential election?
49 votes, 1 pass | Time left: Unlimited | |
Ralph Nader | |
6 (12%) |
|
Al Gore | |
2 (4%) |
|
Bill Clinton | |
4 (8%) |
|
SCOTUS | |
35 (71%) |
|
George Bush | |
0 (0%) |
|
Monica Lewinsky | |
0 (0%) |
|
None of the Above | |
2 (4%) |
|
1 DU member did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

I really do put a lot of blame on those who couldn't see a difference between Bush and Gore.
Zynx
Apr 2016
#4
There is more than one culprit - Bush, SCOTUS, Nader, Katherine Harris, Brooks Brothers riot by
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2016
#8
Al Gore won the popular vote so, the voters clearly did not want a republican president. nt
Henhouse
Apr 2016
#21
The Constitution delegates the right to run Presidential elections to the states
Samantha
Apr 2016
#22
SCOTUS behaved abominably but Gore would still have lost if the recount he wanted had been allowed
Nye Bevan
Apr 2016
#25
Anyone who blames Nader for Gore's loss is hopelessly ignorant of politics.[n/t]
Maedhros
Apr 2016
#36