Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
They went to Obama because he was winning PDs firebrand80 Apr 2016 #1
Wow, you're a fast reader TheDormouse Apr 2016 #2
You're an astute point-dodger nt firebrand80 Apr 2016 #3
we are going to the convention... berniepdx420 Apr 2016 #51
+1. silvershadow Apr 2016 #54
Seats on the DNC are extremely important to the Progressive Revolution. JimDandy Apr 2016 #55
We understand how it works Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #62
and that is exactly what they will do this time. The SD will go to the candidate with the most still_one Apr 2016 #82
if they do, they still can't do that until the end of July TheDormouse Apr 2016 #83
Ok still_one Apr 2016 #88
The superdelegates griffi94 Apr 2016 #4
The superdelegates cannot vote until the end of July TheDormouse Apr 2016 #5
And at the end of july they vote for who has the most pledged delegates griffi94 Apr 2016 #6
Maybe, maybe not. If it was that straightfoward, why are there superdelegates in the TheDormouse Apr 2016 #7
To give the party some measure of control griffi94 Apr 2016 #11
There will be no Hillary blowout after CA and OR get to vote for Bernie. JimDandy Apr 2016 #56
No you're incorrect griffi94 Apr 2016 #57
Tad Devine made the first statement and Bernie Sanders said he had no idea what Tad meant by that Samantha Apr 2016 #91
You live in lala land. Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #64
What in the world makes you thing Sanders will win in such a diverse state as California? brush Apr 2016 #86
So that there's not another McGovern. He lost 49 of 50 states in the general election brush Apr 2016 #84
did McGovern have the most pledged delegates? TheDormouse Apr 2016 #89
He did, but California at the time was winner take all and that push him over the top. brush Apr 2016 #90
They announce their Votes Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #63
You posted a lot of information that's a little premature Dem2 Apr 2016 #8
In the most literal sense, no one can win the nomination before the convention. tritsofme Apr 2016 #9
Except TheDormouse Apr 2016 #10
And pledged delegates could be unfaithful, not show up, etc. tritsofme Apr 2016 #12
They're not going to change their minds. Codeine Apr 2016 #23
just like back in 2008, right? TheDormouse Apr 2016 #27
They switched to back the winner. Codeine Apr 2016 #29
Glad you agree that the will of the people should not be overturned JimDandy Apr 2016 #58
You spent a lot of time on something that would have taken only one sentence to explain. Beacool Apr 2016 #13
Don't miss the forest for the trees. TheDormouse Apr 2016 #15
Yes, you're correct, super delegates don't vote until the convention. Beacool Apr 2016 #22
We've seen plenty of "inevitable" candidates go down in defeat. TheDormouse Apr 2016 #24
Sigh......... Beacool Apr 2016 #61
Pledged delegates don't vote until the convention either. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #31
I don't quite understand this. sadoldgirl Apr 2016 #16
If the pledged delegate count was razor thin and one candidate was far ahead in the popular vote, Beacool Apr 2016 #19
Take your pick. Hillary leads big in both. tritsofme Apr 2016 #20
see post #32 TheDormouse Apr 2016 #36
The nice thing is that Clinton Camp super confident dismissals of the point you are making bjo59 Apr 2016 #14
They're trying to demoralize potential Sanders supporters TheDormouse Apr 2016 #17
yes grasswire Apr 2016 #38
we should know something in May pdsimdars Apr 2016 #87
I know. I was thinking of adding in something about that, but thought you'd made it obvious. bjo59 Apr 2016 #53
Neither does the fervent hope that super delegates will overturn the voters mythology Apr 2016 #50
So we're back to comparing this to 2008 Sheepshank Apr 2016 #18
Hillary has already won the nomination... SidDithers Apr 2016 #21
Exactly. This shit's been over since Super Tuesday. Codeine Apr 2016 #25
Absolutely NOT true and you know it. Neither Sanders nor Clinton have enough delegates yet JimDandy Apr 2016 #60
Hillary lost super delegates in 2008 because she lost pledged delegates. Zynx Apr 2016 #26
Demoralization is a tool of evil. senz Apr 2016 #28
No Senz. It's called an intervention. We're concerned. LuvLoogie Apr 2016 #40
Yeh, concerned about Hillary's chances! senz Apr 2016 #44
Several math mistakes made. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #30
The math does not like sanders.. How do we sue math? beachbum bob Apr 2016 #33
Ask the Republicans. They have been trying and failing. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #34
Where in all of that does Clinton reach 2,383 WITHOUT superdelegate votes? TheDormouse Apr 2016 #35
The rules state: LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #46
Reminder: Hillary leads by 235--but 1,400 still available. TheDormouse Apr 2016 #32
Meaning Sanders would need to win nearly 60% of those 1400. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #73
"She would still fall short by 418 - 377 = 41 pledged delegates." Keep on keeping on! senz Apr 2016 #37
"Stand up! Keep fighting!" grasswire Apr 2016 #41
There are plenty of supers Demsrule86 Apr 2016 #65
It is easier to look at these things in retrospect. DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2016 #39
LOLOL nt grasswire Apr 2016 #42
K&R good guys! Keep this up there! senz Apr 2016 #43
the nominee will be selected on Tuesday. The rest is just wishful thinking. La Lioness Priyanka Apr 2016 #45
At this point, it seems like the FBI is the biggest superdelegate of all Califonz Apr 2016 #47
There are still so many openings for a June surprise artislife Apr 2016 #48
only in Bernieland math will she not have enough. Lil Missy Apr 2016 #49
Whatsa matter? Don't like this kind of math? Can't stand waiting? Can't stand the thought that highprincipleswork Apr 2016 #52
I'm afraid that the Democratic Party Time for change Apr 2016 #59
She doesn't have to, for goodness' sake. MineralMan Apr 2016 #66
kick for George II's edification TheDormouse Apr 2016 #67
Super delegates are most concern about the party as a whole Gothmog Apr 2016 #68
That's what I've been saying but hard core Hillary supporters just refuse to believe the facts. imagine2015 Apr 2016 #69
They're so DESPERATE for Bernie to surrender... Ain't happening Camp Weathervaners... AzDar Apr 2016 #70
If you truely believe that BS - take as much money as you can... CajunBlazer Apr 2016 #71
^ completely misses the point of the post TheDormouse Apr 2016 #72
In other news, water is wet. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #74
Again, if Hillary can reach 2,383 before the convention from pledged TheDormouse Apr 2016 #75
Again, if it's 2175 to 1876 or thereabouts, getting to 2383 is a mere formality. Garrett78 Apr 2016 #77
The pledged delegate runner-up in 2016 will concede about when the runner-up conceded in 2008. LonePirate Apr 2016 #76
Why do you think so? TheDormouse Apr 2016 #78
Because both candidates understand the importance of unity at the convention. LonePirate Apr 2016 #81
your first point is wrong in it's premis...can't be bothered reading the rest Sheepshank Apr 2016 #79
K&R B Calm Apr 2016 #80
I knew this but not in such detail. . . Thanks. pdsimdars Apr 2016 #85
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary can't win the nom...»Reply #1