Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: WHO Is To Blame? [View all]Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)25. SCOTUS behaved abominably but Gore would still have lost if the recount he wanted had been allowed
to go ahead, so can't really blame it for Gore losing.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2001-04-03-floridamain.htm
Biggest problem was Gore's prudishness in keeping Bill Clinton at a distance in his campaign because of the Lewinsky scandal. Related to this was his choice of Joe Lieberman as VP. And of course Nader screwed him in FL.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I really do put a lot of blame on those who couldn't see a difference between Bush and Gore.
Zynx
Apr 2016
#4
There is more than one culprit - Bush, SCOTUS, Nader, Katherine Harris, Brooks Brothers riot by
Agnosticsherbet
Apr 2016
#8
Al Gore won the popular vote so, the voters clearly did not want a republican president. nt
Henhouse
Apr 2016
#21
The Constitution delegates the right to run Presidential elections to the states
Samantha
Apr 2016
#22
SCOTUS behaved abominably but Gore would still have lost if the recount he wanted had been allowed
Nye Bevan
Apr 2016
#25
Anyone who blames Nader for Gore's loss is hopelessly ignorant of politics.[n/t]
Maedhros
Apr 2016
#36