Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stallion

(6,473 posts)
9. Meaning The Foundation is In Fact Owned by Us
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 12:05 PM
Apr 2016

there are no shareholders and no assets are owned, or can be transferred by the Clintons either by gift or devise. Has there ever been such partisan attack on any of the other Presidential Foundations in this Country. Sanders supporters have simply co-opted a right-wing talking point with no logical explanation how Bill Clinton' Foundation affected Hillary Clinton's performance of her duties. Have the same people concerned with Fortune 500 donations to the Clinton Foundation ever raised an issue of those same Fortune 500 company's donations to the Reagan Foundation, the Bush Foundations or even the Obama Foundation?

yup,they all dwell in the same trashcan,no morals,only lust of money and power. wendylaroux Apr 2016 #1
You know that's not campaign money, right? JohnnyRingo Apr 2016 #2
Thank You Stallion Apr 2016 #5
"For you to assume donations are exchanged for political favor is ridiculous." IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #7
I'm not kidding JohnnyRingo Apr 2016 #10
Two years ago I wasn't paying attention. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #14
The Clinton Foundation is a non-profit JohnnyRingo Apr 2016 #16
Believe what you will -- IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #17
There's one thing about conspiracy theorists JohnnyRingo Apr 2016 #18
I suspect its all part of what the FBI is investigating. IdaBriggs Apr 2016 #21
You will know them by the company they keep. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #3
And Fox News has become a major source of information for many Sanders supporters. randome Apr 2016 #4
The Clinton Foundation is a public -not private- charity. randome Apr 2016 #6
Meaning The Foundation is In Fact Owned by Us Stallion Apr 2016 #9
I'm guessing...no. randome Apr 2016 #15
Good for them! Their charitable donation is going toward a worthy cause. NurseJackie Apr 2016 #8
abused women and starving children aren't concerned with 'progressive' politics, obviously wyldwolf Apr 2016 #19
Probably explains why she gets such positive coverge from them brooklynite Apr 2016 #11
Nice. Octafish Apr 2016 #12
Funny that the only pictures I see when Hillary really looks happy BernieforPres2016 Apr 2016 #13
and the Kochs have been donating for some time now amborin Apr 2016 #20
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»James Murdoch of Fox and ...»Reply #9