there was an effort to adhere. But there was nothing posted about the guidelines, and I think there was some serious drift. I would get called to a jury and try to remember what the old rules were, because they were good and effective, but without any place to look them up, I could never remember, so I would just go with my gut.
Now I think about community standards. They are very low. Skinner goes on about how we should uphold standards and vote to hide uncivil posts, regardless of circumstance. But then poster A can tell poster B to fuck off, but if poster B says fuck off back, we are supposed to hide B, even if the first post DIDN'T get a hide. My inclination is just to let it stand because A was asking for it 
I am looking for some CONSISTENCY. It seems dramatically unfair to punish one, but not the other. Especially if the other started it.
Edit history
= new reply since forum marked as read
