Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Do you support the existence of unelected "superdelegates" having a say in who our candidate is? [View all]mythology
(9,527 posts)48. Sort of
I don't think they should determine the nominee in normal circumstances. But I don't object to them being there as a known entity for a circumstance where say a nominee dies or something where there isn't the ability to do a revote.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Do you support the existence of unelected "superdelegates" having a say in who our candidate is? [View all]
Nye Bevan
May 2016
OP
I also don't support corporate media controlling the national narrative.
PowerToThePeople
May 2016
#1
I can find no election where they have gone against the will of the Democratic Party.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#11
Super Delegates were not created until 1982, so they had nothing to do with 1968.
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#19
I will counter that there were no Super Delegates in 1968. To put them there is to create a false
Agnosticsherbet
May 2016
#47
bernie is ok with them...long as they vote for him. vote for hillary = bad of course nt
msongs
May 2016
#16
Definitely do not like the idea that they must "save us", presumably from ourselves!
flor-de-jasmim
May 2016
#28
No, in fact it is really making consider if I want to be part of the "our" at all.
Cobalt Violet
May 2016
#32
Yes...as long as they don't do anything stupid, I don't see the problem with them
qdouble
May 2016
#34
I support these arguments during a non-election cycle when petulant bias is not the stuffing between
LanternWaste
May 2016
#42
I support following the rules and not changing them mid-stream. If you don't like the rules,
Justice
May 2016
#44
Nope. I also have a problem with the notion that superdelegates are a new phenomenon
UMTerp01
May 2016
#51
I think the Republicans would be thrilled to have Superdelegates that could stop Trump
Algernon Moncrieff
May 2016
#52
Have they ever thrown the election to someone who didn't win the pledged delegate battle?
Garrett78
May 2016
#59