Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,508 posts)
12. UNREC
Tue May 3, 2016, 09:21 AM
May 2016

This OP completely misinterprets the date presented.

First: A Joint Fundraising Agreement comes with an agreed upon formula: the first $2700 (FEC legal limit) goes to Clinton. The next $33,400 (also an FEC legal limit) goes to the DNC; any additional contribution goes to the State Parties. And while dinner with George Clooney gets the publicity, most contributors don't give that much, so there will always be a preponderance of funds going to Clinton. THe key is that the donor know this, and wouldn't have given less to Clinton or more to the DNC or State Parties if the JFA didn't exist. This is simply a convenience factor of writing only one check.

Second: The OP criticizes Clinton because the State Parties are giving funds to the DNC which "will use them to support Clinton". The DNC will certainly use funds to support the nominee, which will BE Clinton, but there's no evidence showing that they're spending money on her behalf now. And, the DNC will be spending money on behalf of Senate and House races, Governorhips and State Legislative Races, as well as allocating funds back to State Parties WHERE IT'S NEEDED.

Lying Hillary. Why can't she tell the truth! MsFlorida May 2016 #1
what progressive would attack a democratic leader with adjectives to her name MariaThinks May 2016 #2
Lies about raising big money for down ticket Democrats were used to beat on Bernie supporters daily Human101948 May 2016 #6
at least we don't refer to bernie as MariaThinks May 2016 #14
1% takes 99%. That is her policy. You are warned. kgnu_fan May 2016 #3
Lol, this has bee debunked many times over already Tarc May 2016 #4
Isn't Blue Nation Review a David Brock outlet? Human101948 May 2016 #7
argumentum ad hominem? Tarc May 2016 #8
Not at all...the motivations of sources are noted and challenged frequently on DU... Human101948 May 2016 #11
But it hasn't been debunked. beedle May 2016 #19
Disgusting! This RW garbage is being flung out to depress democratic donations. Firebrand Gary May 2016 #5
Are the figures incorrect? Human101948 May 2016 #9
Yes. The GE is most important for using that money. nt Jitter65 May 2016 #16
For Hillary? Human101948 May 2016 #17
Untrue, Demsrule86 May 2016 #10
UNREC brooklynite May 2016 #12
If it's in POLITICO, it's gotta be true. Right? Octafish May 2016 #13
You are welcome... Human101948 May 2016 #18
"Not at all...the motivations of sources are noted and challenged frequently on DU..." IamMab May 2016 #20
So what are the facts? Human101948 May 2016 #21
K&R EndElectoral May 2016 #15
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»BUSTED: Hypocrite Hillary...»Reply #12