Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I predict that tomorrow in Indiana, Hillary will do substantially better ... [View all]Dr Hobbitstein
(6,568 posts)50. Your "unadjusted exit polls" are debunked in the RawStory article I posted.
Via email, I asked Camp for his source, and he pointed me to a post on Reddit by a user who goes by the handle turn-trout. Turn-trout, who didnt respond to a message seeking comment, claims that these are unadjusted exit polls, and links to a spreadsheet purportedly showing wide discrepancies between the raw data and the final results.
The spreadsheet was created by Richard Charnin, who writes a blog devoted to JFK conspiracy and systemic election fraud analysis. Charnins spreadsheet appears to be the basis of a broad swath of viral Internet content alleging widespread election theft during the 2016 primaries, including the work of Free Press editors Harvey Wasserman and Bob Fitrakis. Charnin seems to think that exit polls can reveal that virtually all our elections have been rigged, writing, in the 1988-2008 presidential elections, the Democrats won the exit polls by 52-42%; they won the recorded vote by just 48-46%, an 8% discrepancy.
The spreadsheet was created by Richard Charnin, who writes a blog devoted to JFK conspiracy and systemic election fraud analysis. Charnins spreadsheet appears to be the basis of a broad swath of viral Internet content alleging widespread election theft during the 2016 primaries, including the work of Free Press editors Harvey Wasserman and Bob Fitrakis. Charnin seems to think that exit polls can reveal that virtually all our elections have been rigged, writing, in the 1988-2008 presidential elections, the Democrats won the exit polls by 52-42%; they won the recorded vote by just 48-46%, an 8% discrepancy.
I know this isn't your first primary. Why do you act like it is?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I predict that tomorrow in Indiana, Hillary will do substantially better ... [View all]
Scuba
May 2016
OP
So you're already test driving conspiracies on why BS is going to lose tomorrow? n/t
SFnomad
May 2016
#2
That's because Hillary's supporters typically vote in the evening after work.
Renew Deal
May 2016
#17
Link for your claim that "Hillary's supporters typically vote in the evening after work.?"
tabasco
May 2016
#56
Interesting that the very first example in this "debunking" links to a CNN poll that does not ...
Scuba
May 2016
#40
Your "unadjusted exit polls" are debunked in the RawStory article I posted.
Dr Hobbitstein
May 2016
#50
I predict that Clinton will win because Indianapolis and Gary will vote heavily in her favor
KingFlorez
May 2016
#7
I predict that regardless of the outcome, Sanders's people will claim, "Foul!"
Buzz Clik
May 2016
#9
Ya, Sanders people have gotten ahead of that 8 ball cry foul before it happens instead of
seabeyond
May 2016
#15
Most of Hillary's vote typically comes in at night after people get out of work.
Renew Deal
May 2016
#16
Yep. I understand that DWS had a meeting yesterday with the Koch Brothers and the head of Diebold
Nye Bevan
May 2016
#21