Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
They also said complain jane May 2016 #1
Who is "they"? Wilms May 2016 #3
Sure! Here you go. complain jane May 2016 #6
Thanks. Wilms May 2016 #15
This is good news. nt ZombieHorde May 2016 #16
It's a smokescreen.., tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #76
The unnamed US...errr FBI officials who Press Virginia May 2016 #7
Its in the Original Story Linked Stallion May 2016 #8
Thanks. Wilms May 2016 #17
Sufficient. Sufficient. That's a word that holds it's little hand up! n/t ebayfool May 2016 #56
Well, they haven't questioned Hillary yet either. Who knows how that will go. nt 99th_Monkey May 2016 #10
"Willfully" Joob May 2016 #11
Zactly. Gross negligence isn't willful and that's what the statute has as its standard. JudyM May 2016 #26
Gross negligence is often defined as wanton and wilful misconduct. COLGATE4 May 2016 #66
Reading comprehension is not your strength apparently. BillZBubb May 2016 #12
Again There Is No Crime if Prosecutor Can't Prove Required Statutory Intent Stallion May 2016 #18
Wrong. Gross negligence. JudyM May 2016 #27
Gross Neligence is a Type of Intent/Mens Rea-Rarely Applied Because it Requires Extreme, Outrageous Stallion May 2016 #30
I think deliberately conducting State business on an insecure server is willfull and gross negligeng HooptieWagon May 2016 #37
Yeah, it seems pretty plain. JudyM May 2016 #52
No, it doesn't. For there to have been gross negligence COLGATE4 May 2016 #68
You think that. And you'd be wrong. nt COLGATE4 May 2016 #67
If you think she used reasonable care I have nothing else to say! JudyM May 2016 #50
No-Negligence is the LACK of Reasonable Care Stallion May 2016 #61
Voluntary disregard... JudyM May 2016 #62
You know what they say about arguing legal issues COLGATE4 May 2016 #70
Reasonable care has nothing to do with gross negligence. COLGATE4 May 2016 #69
Oh, insults! Yay! complain jane May 2016 #19
Actually they Saif "sufficient evidence" and " laws were wilfully broken" Seeinghope May 2016 #23
No, that's wishful thinking on your part. It can just as easily mean COLGATE4 May 2016 #71
Well now. Let's see how this plays out. Seeinghope May 2016 #2
It doesn't change anything. That happens only if the FBI recommends indictment. BillZBubb May 2016 #4
I've been hearing for awhile that it was unclear whether Hillary would be questioned 99th_Monkey May 2016 #14
I'm sure s get Cheney to go with her mindwalker_i May 2016 #41
It was announced in February she was going to get questioned. IdaBriggs May 2016 #48
to my layman thinking, the only game changer might be is if indictment 2banon May 2016 #72
still, it's unbelievable to me 99th_Monkey May 2016 #74
If memory serves, (that's a big IF) I believe Nixon was the first.. 2banon May 2016 #75
Thanks for the reply. Assuming that was the case with Nixon (which does sound plausible), 99th_Monkey May 2016 #78
I suspect the Repukes pounced on Bill and Hill back in the '90s BECAUSE of Watergate 2banon May 2016 #79
DOJ said last week a referral is being prepared against her. That's a case. JudyM May 2016 #28
Now we've gone from US officials being the source Press Virginia May 2016 #5
Exactly! NWCorona May 2016 #21
This is beginning to feel like watching Pong. Barack_America May 2016 #57
But referring back to the CNN article, as if that were their source winter is coming May 2016 #64
It's most likely a secretary or the mail room guy. Press Virginia May 2016 #65
Which they proved is not true... scscholar May 2016 #9
they did grasswire May 2016 #20
But the FBI recently confirmed they didn't... scscholar May 2016 #34
It was reported her aides had been questioned. HooptieWagon May 2016 #39
So Faux Knews lied. scscholar May 2016 #43
LA Times real enough for you? HooptieWagon May 2016 #45
The level of denial on this is absolutely breathtaking. nt 99th_Monkey May 2016 #47
Denial is strong in fanclub atmosphere. HooptieWagon May 2016 #49
CNN... bobbobbins01 May 2016 #55
Jesus H Christ bobbobbins01 May 2016 #54
I want to hear that from the FBI themselves tularetom May 2016 #13
The perception of wrongdoing is often as damaging is the reality of wrongdoing. Drip, drip, drip. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #22
That is what I was thinking. For those who are taking comfort jwirr May 2016 #35
Of course those courteous and kindly Republicans won't say anything about an FBI investigation. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #38
Exactly. jwirr May 2016 #40
Yes and no The Second Stone May 2016 #24
Silly question, I'm sure... casperthegm May 2016 #25
Yes. 99th_Monkey May 2016 #42
But,- it was just reported here officially that it was all over and there was nothing more to see notadmblnd May 2016 #29
But but but angrychair May 2016 #31
It was not just an "unknown source", it was an unknown "US official" EndElectoral May 2016 #32
Oh angrychair May 2016 #46
Great question. Why indeed. 99th_Monkey May 2016 #44
I have seen numerous posts from the usual TM99 May 2016 #33
Please, tell us more about your long, deep-seated interest in Cabinet official's e-mail practices Tarc May 2016 #36
. . . or not. nt ucrdem May 2016 #51
How much bullshit is packed in this? catnhatnh May 2016 #53
Just announced it's hardly over, just getting started. ViseGrip May 2016 #58
It's over Demsrule86 May 2016 #63
usuncut obamanut2012 May 2016 #59
Golly gee, that must mean the FBI will issue a citation? Sheepshank May 2016 #60
This was said before except it's definite now that Hillary WILL be interviewed. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #73
It all depends on her intent BlueStateLib May 2016 #77
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Game Changer? "FBI Confi...»Reply #21