Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kaleckim

(651 posts)
17. Sorry
Fri May 6, 2016, 12:42 PM
May 2016

where were the history or facts? What the hell does this have to do with Sanders? I agree, he is almost certain to lose, and this post wasn't about him. YOU injected him because you are incapable of defending her.

"My post was about proving she helped the deal which you said would have never happened with Clinton involved"

You didn't prove anything, you kind of tried to, but your post gave credit to her; the video, the article demolished the logic behind that. You are doing nothing more than copying and pasting the type of thing I could find on her campaign website, you drop the mic and think you've nailed it. You haven't. You don't know history because you can repeat talking points fed to you by people smarter than yourself. One last time, read this slowly if it helps, she said that Obama was naive to try a deal like that in 2008, did not want to negotiate the deal and didn't think it would succeed, and supported sanctions on the country after she left the State Department. Your argument, which is just regurgitating her claims, is contradicted by everything else now emerging, which is kind of the point.

"btw your hero"

My hero is Noam Chomsky. Bernie Sanders is a decent man and isn't, like your center-right candidate, corrupt. He takes stances on issues that I agree with and would benefit me as a working person. That's it. He's a decent man and is a far better candidate than the train wreck the Democrats decided on, a person that will have the lowest net favorables of any major candidates in polling history, if someone other than Trump gets the nomination. Again, you keep injecting Sanders into the conversation because you are incapable of discussing Clinton in isolation. If you can't inject him you will a Republican for the same reason.

Your 30 years in politics haven't amounted to anything. Maybe step aside, since your generation inherited a country in much better shape than the one you are handing over to us (across the board), and let us try to clean up the mess you created.

Oh please! Hillary supported the deal. hrmjustin May 2016 #1
Thank you still_one May 2016 #3
She's a hawk kaleckim May 2016 #5
Revisionist history is bull! hrmjustin May 2016 #7
What the hell is revisionist? kaleckim May 2016 #9
In the words of the NYT, it's more complicated karynnj May 2016 #14
Woulda, coulda shoulda. The fact is, Hillary backs Obama's position. nt oasis May 2016 #2
Not exactly... tk2kewl May 2016 #19
More completely expected bS from a BS supporrter puffy socks May 2016 #4
What you posted has nothing to do with the video kaleckim May 2016 #8
She wouldnt have prevented the deal puffy socks May 2016 #10
No, your logic is fuzzy and confused kaleckim May 2016 #12
Keep on trying... puffy socks May 2016 #15
Sorry kaleckim May 2016 #17
Hillary Clinton breaks with Obama, threatens war to enforce Iran deal tk2kewl May 2016 #20
Old news, Kokonoe May 2016 #6
here is Hillary back a few yrs w/ James Baker: Laughing about bombing Iran: amborin May 2016 #11
Nope kaleckim May 2016 #13
Don't worry. Only the Bad Guys commit war crimes. We're the Good Guys. RufusTFirefly May 2016 #16
GOD I hate Her. / FlatBaroque May 2016 #21
haaaHAAAAAAA MisterP May 2016 #22
Neoc-lint-on Arugula Latte May 2016 #18
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»REPORT: Hillary Clinton W...»Reply #17