Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
46. Not ok for Obama
Mon May 9, 2016, 11:10 PM
May 2016

His AG already warned the WH to step away.

Obama needs to leap away. You want him hurt?

Oh No! Not a Special Prosecutor [View all] RobertEarl May 2016 OP
These ops seem to be getting more desperate. hrmjustin May 2016 #1
Desperate times call for desperate measures. George II May 2016 #49
+1 uponit7771 May 2016 #71
Well your memory is a bit off it was "whitewater" not "watergate" awake May 2016 #2
Thanks, fixed RobertEarl May 2016 #4
Funny, because I don't see ANY meat in that OP whatsoever .. just more BS innuendo n/t SFnomad May 2016 #15
You want Obama in trouble? RobertEarl May 2016 #18
FFS, you people really are desperate, aren't you? Sounds like something you'd hear on Faux "News" nt SFnomad May 2016 #24
this quotes NYT saying HRC gets her military advice from Fox news pundit: amborin May 2016 #79
intent isn't necessary to conviction under those parts of Sec 793 leveymg May 2016 #27
I bow to your wisdom and knowledge RobertEarl May 2016 #31
Time to bring this to the only possible conclusion. leveymg May 2016 #34
Pardon? RobertEarl May 2016 #36
After she releases her delegates because she is no longer viable leveymg May 2016 #41
But this seems worse than Deutch RobertEarl May 2016 #42
It may be worse , but legally it's the same crime. leveymg May 2016 #51
No real doubt about it. If foreign spies didn't get in, they're probably in a prison right now Bob41213 May 2016 #66
Wash his hands of WHAT? You still haven't said, just vague innuendo in an apparent.... George II May 2016 #52
the mechanism of a McCarthyist campaign -- innuendo. "Who needs evidence?"_RNC Bill USA May 2016 #98
Meat? George II May 2016 #47
your memory of watergate is...faulty. watergate was about nixon, not clinton msongs May 2016 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel May 2016 #5
The FBI doesn't even need to find intent. Fawke Em May 2016 #6
True that RobertEarl May 2016 #8
That's Utter Nonsense Stallion May 2016 #12
Do you need a degree... dchill May 2016 #77
This ^ Betty Karlson May 2016 #78
The special prosecutor law expired in the Bush administration jberryhill May 2016 #7
How'd they get Libby? RobertEarl May 2016 #11
He leaked Demsrule86 May 2016 #17
Correction-- he was the fall guy for the Plame affair Art_from_Ark May 2016 #58
Libby supposedly got in trouble for lying, not for leaking as I understand it. JDPriestly May 2016 #81
Scooter wasn't prosecuted by the US Office of the Independent Counsel ... SFnomad May 2016 #23
No time for that RobertEarl May 2016 #28
He can't .. but don't let facts get in the way of your spew SFnomad May 2016 #30
US Attorney. hrmjustin May 2016 #26
Libby got in trouble for lying, not for a security breach. JDPriestly May 2016 #80
There you go posting facts like that. hrmjustin May 2016 #25
What exactly would her "intent" be? You think she was trying to disseminate secret info to Hoyt May 2016 #9
To anyone without proper clearance AgingAmerican May 2016 #22
And why would she do that? IF there was anything going on, I think it will be some staffers, not Hoyt May 2016 #60
I have no clue why AgingAmerican May 2016 #72
Not quite up to following through with following safeguards... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #75
Heck, Sanders has probably never read a really important national security email. Hoyt May 2016 #88
Interesting that you're saying having access to information trumps knowing how to handle it... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #90
Since there is no evidence information was compromised, she handled it well. Hoyt May 2016 #91
Well, I suppose in YOUR mind, anyway... MrMickeysMom May 2016 #92
There's no mention of a Special Prosecuter left-of-center2012 May 2016 #10
Obama has got to be real careful RobertEarl May 2016 #13
He's the one who hired her and looked the other way while she ran a rogue State Dept. tularetom May 2016 #14
"He knew she was a snake when he appointed her. Art_from_Ark May 2016 #63
Really, she was not qualified for SoS RobertEarl May 2016 #65
One of the problems of relying on staff to overcome weaknesses is HereSince1628 May 2016 #85
My opinion also. JDPriestly May 2016 #82
So desperate Demsrule86 May 2016 #16
Do you have a link or is this just Demsrule86 May 2016 #19
Wingnuttery Dem2 May 2016 #20
+1 JoePhilly May 2016 #38
Whitewater was a bust for the GOP Demsrule86 May 2016 #21
Not a word on this anywhere MFM008 May 2016 #29
This is a truly ignorant thread. Kenneth Starr spent millions investigating the Clinton's as a Trust Buster May 2016 #32
Why did you say this? I am interested because that is also where I believe this is going Samantha May 2016 #33
They Impeached a Clinton once already RobertEarl May 2016 #40
Legal terms won't stop them but a good Constitutional lawyer can Samantha May 2016 #54
I'm pulling for Obama RobertEarl May 2016 #61
I voted for Obama both times Samantha May 2016 #69
True but it is easy to find an excuse to impeach an unpopular president. JDPriestly May 2016 #83
This thread is comedy gold. hrmjustin May 2016 #35
It is! rusty fender May 2016 #73
Special Prosecutors don't exist anymore (nt) Recursion May 2016 #37
... SidDithers May 2016 #39
Why do you post this garbage? Who? What? Why? Do you really think this..... George II May 2016 #43
The hate is strong in some posters Andy823 May 2016 #59
Are you old enough to remember Watergate? I am. JDPriestly May 2016 #84
Yes, I was in my mid-20s at the time. As much as you people TRY to make this like.... George II May 2016 #87
Lol. Ok. This thread shows you are really really knowledgeable about these things. JTFrog May 2016 #44
Not ok for Obama RobertEarl May 2016 #46
Your stupid OP is taking a turn for the worse isn't it? Might want to do a little research. n/t JTFrog May 2016 #50
The Clintons have suggested Philip Zelikow whatchamacallit May 2016 #45
Of course they would RobertEarl May 2016 #48
Fitzmas! bigwillq May 2016 #53
Back to my original question Samantha May 2016 #55
A little birdie RobertEarl May 2016 #56
. hrmjustin May 2016 #57
Hillary did it to him. grasswire May 2016 #62
That's the point I tried to make RobertEarl May 2016 #64
why would he feel any loyalty to her? grasswire May 2016 #95
Oh. You again. okasha May 2016 #67
I remember that thread. hrmjustin May 2016 #68
That thread was pretty hard to forget. okasha May 2016 #70
Invade? RobertEarl May 2016 #94
Nice try, but too many people remember that thread. okasha May 2016 #96
The rays coming from Fukushima RobertEarl May 2016 #97
Don't lose mad. Just lose. nt LexVegas May 2016 #74
Congratulations! This is today's craziest OP. mikehiggins May 2016 #76
I don't see how we aren't witnessing the Sanders campaign last desperate push. NCTraveler May 2016 #86
I'm waiting for the "I am not a crook" statement. hobbit709 May 2016 #89
The AG can appoint a Special Council now days. pdsimdars May 2016 #93
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Oh No! Not a Special Pros...»Reply #46