2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: New National Poll: Trump Surges into Virtual tie, Clinton Fades again [View all]Autumn
(47,718 posts)Democratic candidate." That was exactly what you said. Clear as a bell. And if we have no voice in who the nominee is I see no reason to vote for the nominee you select. You and DWS are saying that we shouldn't be allowed to vote to determine who the democratic nominee is that we will eventually vote for. That is saying we should keep our mouths shut and vote for whomever you decide to allow us to vote for. Walk it back and parse it all you want, that is what you are saying. Your candidate and the members in your party don't need or want Independents, we have no right to have our voice heard. I don't ever remember that being so blatantly thrown in the face of democratic voters who are not registered in your party. It won't shock me at all if you get your way and Independents don't show up for her in the GE. This has been the most eye opening election of my entire life, you people really opened the curtains on this one.
Bernie has always caucused with the democrats in the Senate, he has been a staunch political ally to the democrats but because he had the nerve to run against a severely flawed centrist you people treat him like dirt, and his supporters.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):