Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION, it's implied in the name. It's always been an investigation. onecaliberal May 2016 #1
It never was a "Security Review" FreakinDJ May 2016 #2
Got proof of that? scscholar May 2016 #14
Find one case where the FBI did a security review. I'll wait. NWCorona May 2016 #16
Plus, HIllary isn't even the target! scscholar May 2016 #19
Then who is? NWCorona May 2016 #20
I haven't heard DWS say yet. scscholar May 2016 #21
I doubt that she ever would because it's obvious who is. NWCorona May 2016 #22
OK then so post your evidence of who you think the target is scscholar May 2016 #23
It's Hillary and her staff. There isn't anybody else in the chain of custody. NWCorona May 2016 #24
Is this a joke? Why are you quoting DWS. DesMoinesDem May 2016 #27
So you think fourth-hand hearsay is more accurate... scscholar May 2016 #28
Anything is more accurate than asking DWS. DesMoinesDem May 2016 #30
Saw it live, but oddly enough can't find the feed of HIM saying it now. Joob May 2016 #18
Scholar--educate yourself panader0 May 2016 #39
So you quote Faux Knews who is quoting someone who is quoting someone who is quoting Comey? scscholar May 2016 #40
No, but Her Majesty has evolved into a criminal suspect BillZBubb May 2016 #3
Ahem timmymoff May 2016 #5
A thousand pardons, I meant no affront to the Annointed One! BillZBubb May 2016 #6
No problem timmymoff May 2016 #7
The both of you are in excellent form today! pdsimdars May 2016 #35
not so named officially yet. grasswire May 2016 #10
The FBI investigates crimes AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #4
it was never a "security review" grasswire May 2016 #8
Big Surprise Worldly Traveler May 2016 #9
So yeah. Her Magesty lied. Jennylynn May 2016 #11
It wasn't lying, it was dissembling, it's purpose was obfuscation HereSince1628 May 2016 #33
Are you totally sure she didn't just 'mis-speak' AGAIN? pdsimdars May 2016 #36
Nope. She does seem to do that a lot Jennylynn May 2016 #38
IC IG did not make a criminal referral - it was a security referral BlueStateLib May 2016 #12
Has your Berniebro anger evolved to bargaining? nt LexVegas May 2016 #13
Sorry what? That made zero sense. SwampG8r May 2016 #15
She didn't have permission either, that's another big lie. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #17
It was referred as a review nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #25
it hasn't "evolved". It is and always was a serious investigation, with only the candy coating by highprincipleswork May 2016 #26
It was NEVER a security review or inquiry as Hillary STATED! They clarified it's always ViseGrip May 2016 #29
Spinning like a top. pdsimdars May 2016 #37
. mmonk May 2016 #31
The Federal Bureau of Security Reviews has bumped this up. FlatBaroque May 2016 #32
No, the Hillary talking points to frame the issue have been shot down by the head of the FBI pdsimdars May 2016 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Has the security review e...»Reply #10