Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Waiting For Everyman

(9,385 posts)
17. She didn't have permission either, that's another big lie.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:34 PM
May 2016

All of the excuses she has made about this are bullshit. Look you in the eye and lie to you bullshit.

The public will catch up and know all about this in due time. I don't think they're going to be happy about it.

Federal Bureau of INVESTIGATION, it's implied in the name. It's always been an investigation. onecaliberal May 2016 #1
It never was a "Security Review" FreakinDJ May 2016 #2
Got proof of that? scscholar May 2016 #14
Find one case where the FBI did a security review. I'll wait. NWCorona May 2016 #16
Plus, HIllary isn't even the target! scscholar May 2016 #19
Then who is? NWCorona May 2016 #20
I haven't heard DWS say yet. scscholar May 2016 #21
I doubt that she ever would because it's obvious who is. NWCorona May 2016 #22
OK then so post your evidence of who you think the target is scscholar May 2016 #23
It's Hillary and her staff. There isn't anybody else in the chain of custody. NWCorona May 2016 #24
Is this a joke? Why are you quoting DWS. DesMoinesDem May 2016 #27
So you think fourth-hand hearsay is more accurate... scscholar May 2016 #28
Anything is more accurate than asking DWS. DesMoinesDem May 2016 #30
Saw it live, but oddly enough can't find the feed of HIM saying it now. Joob May 2016 #18
Scholar--educate yourself panader0 May 2016 #39
So you quote Faux Knews who is quoting someone who is quoting someone who is quoting Comey? scscholar May 2016 #40
No, but Her Majesty has evolved into a criminal suspect BillZBubb May 2016 #3
Ahem timmymoff May 2016 #5
A thousand pardons, I meant no affront to the Annointed One! BillZBubb May 2016 #6
No problem timmymoff May 2016 #7
The both of you are in excellent form today! pdsimdars May 2016 #35
not so named officially yet. grasswire May 2016 #10
The FBI investigates crimes AgerolanAmerican May 2016 #4
it was never a "security review" grasswire May 2016 #8
Big Surprise Worldly Traveler May 2016 #9
So yeah. Her Magesty lied. Jennylynn May 2016 #11
It wasn't lying, it was dissembling, it's purpose was obfuscation HereSince1628 May 2016 #33
Are you totally sure she didn't just 'mis-speak' AGAIN? pdsimdars May 2016 #36
Nope. She does seem to do that a lot Jennylynn May 2016 #38
IC IG did not make a criminal referral - it was a security referral BlueStateLib May 2016 #12
Has your Berniebro anger evolved to bargaining? nt LexVegas May 2016 #13
Sorry what? That made zero sense. SwampG8r May 2016 #15
She didn't have permission either, that's another big lie. Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #17
It was referred as a review nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #25
it hasn't "evolved". It is and always was a serious investigation, with only the candy coating by highprincipleswork May 2016 #26
It was NEVER a security review or inquiry as Hillary STATED! They clarified it's always ViseGrip May 2016 #29
Spinning like a top. pdsimdars May 2016 #37
. mmonk May 2016 #31
The Federal Bureau of Security Reviews has bumped this up. FlatBaroque May 2016 #32
No, the Hillary talking points to frame the issue have been shot down by the head of the FBI pdsimdars May 2016 #34
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Has the security review e...»Reply #17