Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
But not Liberal Democrats by 3.5+ million. nt onehandle May 2016 #1
No wonder no one trusts Hillary - there is that false and dishonest number again. How many votes did Attorney in Texas May 2016 #2
Those caucus voter totals wouldn't add up to a three million vote deficit KingFlorez May 2016 #4
They would certainly make the number offered false and misleading. But the "it's not a complete lie" Attorney in Texas May 2016 #5
Oh, dry up KingFlorez May 2016 #7
That's probably the best response when caught red-handed pushing misleading numbers. Attorney in Texas May 2016 #8
I want a great reform movement and a better, more stable Hortensis May 2016 #11
You nailed it. "This nitpicking and nagging is just sad." grossproffit May 2016 #15
Maybe this is why nobody trusts Hillary. Maybe she thinks expecting truth is "nitpicking" Vote2016 May 2016 #16
and 59 million voters haven''t even voted yet! Wow she's so popular, lol. B Calm May 2016 #33
12.5 million votes for Hillary. MILLIONS more than any other candidate in either party lunamagica May 2016 #6
The problem is that won't buy us a cup of coffee. BillZBubb May 2016 #3
Hillary only does well among elderly and retired Democrats, some minority groups, One Black Sheep May 2016 #9
And lobbyists Vote2016 May 2016 #13
And a few Republican women. And a regional appeal to those silvershadow May 2016 #22
Democrats can win without winning men, whites, and independents ContinentalOp May 2016 #23
The future will neither exclude people by race nor exclude them by gender Vote2016 May 2016 #29
some? uponit7771 May 2016 #25
Not Asians or Native Americans or Arabs, etc. Vote2016 May 2016 #34
Not this liberal and Buzz cook May 2016 #10
Does your definition of liberalism include imperial interventionist nation building? Vote2016 May 2016 #32
Nope that's why I wanted Clinton in 2008 Buzz cook May 2016 #35
The whole article is well worth reading Vote2016 May 2016 #12
I hope his next four years as President of Liberlandia are very fruitful. Congrats! Starry Messenger May 2016 #14
Is Liberlandia where we're all going to move when Trump gets elected? Vote2016 May 2016 #17
Some people seem to think so. Starry Messenger May 2016 #18
He gets to be a do nothing President. Sanders kind of gig. Nt. seabeyond May 2016 #20
He's not my president and won't ever be Il_Coniglietto May 2016 #19
A positive, true OP was spat upon by those who cannot tolerate optimism and hope. senz May 2016 #21
Someone posts a positive thread, and the Hillarians crap in it. Someone posts a comparative thread, Vote2016 May 2016 #27
I've seen it over and over and over again. senz May 2016 #30
It's a top down problem Vote2016 May 2016 #31
This is false uponit7771 May 2016 #24
It's an opinion. False is when Hillary puts a specific number on a "vote total" that includes zero Vote2016 May 2016 #26
Liberalism != Progressivism apnu May 2016 #28
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Bernie Sanders Is Already...»Reply #19