Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary demanded a Secretary of State appointment in exchange for calling off her PUMAs. [View all]apnu
(8,749 posts)134. Yup. People forget Bernie is a politician.
By defination, he makes deals and uses leverage. He is not His High Holiness Saint Bernie of Sanders. Rather, he is a political animal who's spent decades as an independent getting things done in Congress. And again, nothing gets done in Congress without deals, swapping favors and votes, all involving leverage. Bernie has leverage now, he will use it before this is over.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
137 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary demanded a Secretary of State appointment in exchange for calling off her PUMAs. [View all]
Attorney in Texas
May 2016
OP
So the lack of evidence is the evidence? Sounds like what the Repubs have been arguing
synergie
May 2016
#66
Actually, no. But Republicans do need to project when their tactics are called out. Well done.
synergie
May 2016
#136
You call that racist, I call it racist to assume that her calling out drug dealers as predators . .
brush
May 2016
#131
Horsetrading Cabinet positions is a common practice, but it's illegal, so everyone denies it
leveymg
May 2016
#133
"Sanders is not making any similar demand". Yet, you forgot to include the 'yet'.
procon
May 2016
#5
Wow you truly are a piece of work, threatening to report a thread because you don't like the content
insta8er
May 2016
#15
I'd rather not see accusations of illegality without proof levied against Democrats
Tarc
May 2016
#45
Trust me she has violated many laws and helped to ensure that people with money
Live and Learn
May 2016
#25
Who you calling boy? Racist term but I am sure you will deny being one. nt
Live and Learn
May 2016
#47
Yeah, you don't have much credibility since you seem to enjoy many works of fiction
synergie
May 2016
#71
I think it is a lie that Clinton had anything to do with PUMA one way or another. PUMA of 2016
seabeyond
May 2016
#8
When is he going to magnanimous to liberals? Seems it only applies to conservatives otherwise
TheKentuckian
May 2016
#93
Sounds legit. Absent evidence to the contrary, I will have to assume it is true.
silvershadow
May 2016
#23
Sounds false. Absent evidence to the contrary, I will have to assume it's made up crap.
Fla Dem
May 2016
#62
Sure, and Bernie Sanders and Jane have a history of fraud and birbery. Absent evidence
synergie
May 2016
#68
This thread goes a long way in explaining Texas. This poster calls him/herself an
Trust Buster
May 2016
#54
Can you provide a source for your title? If not, why should anyone read anything beneath it? ...
1StrongBlackMan
May 2016
#60
That is because you are a lawyer who understands why sourcing/evidence is important
Gothmog
May 2016
#105
And your evidence that she made such a demand, and that Bernie is not making demands?
synergie
May 2016
#65
When have we ever suggest a President hire someone that exclusively works against them?
seabeyond
May 2016
#74
Your reply has nothing to do with my post. I have no expectation you voting Clinton for any reason.
seabeyond
May 2016
#81
Let's go there. I'm a white, middle-aged working class white guy with three draft age sons.
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#85
Someone who did behave, to use your word as "shitty" as Tulis did. Refresh my memory,
synergie
May 2016
#90
When did Hillary indulge in stupid antics and say utterly false and homophobic things?
lumberjack_jeff
May 2016
#98
As you can see, there are all sorts of ex post facto cover stories being concocted in denial
tularetom
May 2016
#101
Well, now. Aren't you just the lying sack. Hmmm? (read with your best church lady voice)
Squinch
May 2016
#107
Peesonally, I have more faith in both Obama and Hillary when these decisions
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#108
"Party Rules" mean a lot to someone who wasn't a member of the Party until last year?
brooklynite
May 2016
#119
Take down your post. You look beyond foolish for making up stuff without any evidence! Is this
riversedge
May 2016
#127