Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Hillary: "fused and fired by fever-ridden ambition and sense of pure entitlement. IT IS HER TURN" [View all]imagine2015
(2,054 posts)36. You mean like right-wing corporatists funding Hillary? No I'm not.
However, even conservatives can once and a while make a serious point that is true. For example this one:
"Sanders has played fair. He has treated Hillary with respect, even deference. He threw out an assault on her outstanding weakness the secret server and all its classified emails. He took, insofar as one can in this era, the high road. If she is still just barely winning, what hope can she really have when He Who Knows No Boundaries Whatsoever steps us to work his inexplicable magic?"
Do you take issue with this observation?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
167 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hillary: "fused and fired by fever-ridden ambition and sense of pure entitlement. IT IS HER TURN" [View all]
imagine2015
May 2016
OP
LOL, another idiotic "clinton hater" comment which means "did not want hill as president"
Logical
May 2016
#64
Since you insist on there being 'sides' to this, why can't you stop talking about Clinton?
randome
May 2016
#123
If it were Bernie vs. Carly Fiorina, I wonder who would be the preferred candidate?
Armstead
May 2016
#16
No, Hillary is lying about her agenda- And about the past agreements she is bound by
Baobab
May 2016
#73
Ambitious? His quiet victories as legislator wouldn't have been quiet. You are used to status quo.
snowy owl
May 2016
#87
I was surprised to read the other day that Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher did not want the Berlin Wall
Baobab
May 2016
#52
A lot of people feared a re-unified Germany in the heart of Europe for some reason.
BillZBubb
May 2016
#78
And Germany has become the leader of the EU. Merkel smarter than Thatcher by a country mile.
snowy owl
May 2016
#88
But how often are men who seek the presidency called out for their ambition?
mythology
May 2016
#104
You are wrong, it doesn not. If Elizabeth Warren were running, I would be out door to door for her.
litlbilly
May 2016
#63
Idiocy - "man" gender neutral in this case. Rex did not mean gender-specific. Distraction.
snowy owl
May 2016
#89
Indeed. I would vote for Elizabeth Warren in a second. OTOH, Hillary is a bad choice- for many reaso
Baobab
May 2016
#84
of course . . . but not relevant to this article. You've taken it and made it a distraction.
snowy owl
May 2016
#90
Your comments merely reflect your total lack of awareness of this history of democratic candidates.
Big Blue Marble
May 2016
#44
Maybe it's all you recognize? You are too wrapped up in a buzz word. Lazy. Try to look beyond...
snowy owl
May 2016
#99
If you've lived "lifetime" of it, then you have been using failed strategies. Look inward.
snowy owl
May 2016
#103
But that's the problem, Bernie is not "ambition-filled" which is why he's been successful.
snowy owl
May 2016
#86
Bernie is not. Warren is not. Perhaps Merkley is not. HRC supporters used to corruption.
snowy owl
May 2016
#93
Ambition was a problem for Richard Nixon. Men certainly face criticism for being overly ambitious
Rilgin
May 2016
#139
Then why is Hillary being extrapolated here vs the rest of people who did the same thing? Like
uponit7771
May 2016
#163
She's an accomplished professional woman who has and IS working her ass off to get elected.
KittyWampus
May 2016
#9
Former professor/amendment king/quiet victories? Clearly your worship idols. Easier than reading.
snowy owl
May 2016
#102
Not so strange "bedfellows". The Clintons and rich Republican donors to Hillary's campaign.
imagine2015
May 2016
#18
Ambition is one thing. Ambition so that you will do anything to serve it is another. I don't think
highprincipleswork
May 2016
#15
He may not have when he started this campaign, but his ego is getting bigger every day as is his
riversedge
May 2016
#54
His mandate has gotten bigger. We want him to represent us, even if some of you don't. Tell me,
highprincipleswork
May 2016
#96
"beating like rented mule" - I don't use such comparisons. I've become kinder than that. Brutality
snowy owl
May 2016
#112
How many primaries has Bernie won since the 3,000,000 came out and it has not changed?
-none
May 2016
#85
if you've seen better prose in Cosmo, you have little understanding of good writing
snowy owl
May 2016
#107
This article is an absolute dumpster fire of overly-ornamented prose.
Starry Messenger
May 2016
#110
Does anyone disagree with this comment made by the articles writer? And if so, what?
imagine2015
May 2016
#40
To me, she's an opportunist. She's had little legislative experience. Same with Obama.
snowy owl
May 2016
#116
"Because no one in the state department, Bradley Manning, has ever compromised security"
dana_b
May 2016
#140
omg - really?! This post is one for the books. YOU and your daughter have rights and knoe EVERYTHING
dana_b
May 2016
#144
Someday we'll have a progressive/liberal woman running for President. It might be Elizabeth Warren.
imagine2015
May 2016
#53
I love how there's supposedly no enthusiasm for the candidate who has received more votes than all
Metric System
May 2016
#59
And who do you think is going to Republican donors for money? Clue. It isn't Sanders
imagine2015
May 2016
#97
You deny he's become a rock start of sorts?Where are the 10s/1000s for HRC?Acceptance vs.Enthusiasm
snowy owl
May 2016
#118
Independents, tea-party republicans, and progressive dems. He attracts them all. He's a rock star!
snowy owl
May 2016
#153
Hell yes, it is her turn because We the people have spoken making it her turn.
Thinkingabout
May 2016
#101
Nothing to do with turns/sexism. Sexism all you you got, you go with it. Better candidate=Sanders.
snowy owl
May 2016
#119
Besides being sexist, it's her turn because she EARNED MORE VOTES than BS did.
Lil Missy
May 2016
#126
She tends toward sensationalism. Little reason but big emotion. Idolatry and loyalty.
snowy owl
May 2016
#154
Clinton will have to support centrist dems and centrist republicans to win 2020. Huge problem for us
snowy owl
May 2016
#155
With 70% of voters to her left. I'd say there is room for an alternative approach. eom
Betty Karlson
May 2016
#156