Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Notice the quotes around something that only Clinton-Haters keep saying. randome May 2016 #1
that made me LOL tk2kewl May 2016 #10
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #58
LOL, another idiotic "clinton hater" comment which means "did not want hill as president" Logical May 2016 #64
Since you insist on there being 'sides' to this, why can't you stop talking about Clinton? randome May 2016 #123
Wait, there was a time when the BSers were interested in actual issues? synergie May 2016 #160
So I've heard. Now it's all about Clinton. randome May 2016 #165
These criticisms are grounded in sexism, pure and simple. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #2
+ 1 JoePhilly May 2016 #3
Oh that's a old and worn out talking point. imagine2015 May 2016 #7
If it were Bernie vs. Carly Fiorina, I wonder who would be the preferred candidate? Armstead May 2016 #16
No, sexism is as serious as racism. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #39
Think she'd be a good president? Armstead May 2016 #56
Strange question to ask on a democratic forum. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #67
There's ambition and there's ambition Armstead May 2016 #115
??? Fairgo May 2016 #121
Not every woman is capable.....nor is every man. apcalc May 2016 #79
Its not worth arguing with those folks Baobab May 2016 #49
The gobbledegook is coming from the Sanders supporters. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #70
No, Hillary is lying about her agenda- And about the past agreements she is bound by Baobab May 2016 #73
i would say provide a link to this accusation. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #77
Of course she is ambitious. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #32
Ambitious? His quiet victories as legislator wouldn't have been quiet. You are used to status quo. snowy owl May 2016 #87
Perfectly stated. pangaia May 2016 #135
He is were not ambitious, he would not be running. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #151
I was surprised to read the other day that Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher did not want the Berlin Wall Baobab May 2016 #52
A lot of people feared a re-unified Germany in the heart of Europe for some reason. BillZBubb May 2016 #78
And Germany has become the leader of the EU. Merkel smarter than Thatcher by a country mile. snowy owl May 2016 #88
But how often are men who seek the presidency called out for their ambition? mythology May 2016 #104
Bullshit. Fawke Em May 2016 #8
Oh but it does. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #35
You are wrong, it doesn not. If Elizabeth Warren were running, I would be out door to door for her. litlbilly May 2016 #63
Your potential support of a Warren candidacy only proves that Big Blue Marble May 2016 #71
What a load of horse pucky. BillZBubb May 2016 #80
How foolish are you! N/T Big Blue Marble May 2016 #150
Idiocy - "man" gender neutral in this case. Rex did not mean gender-specific. Distraction. snowy owl May 2016 #89
Indeed. I would vote for Elizabeth Warren in a second. OTOH, Hillary is a bad choice- for many reaso Baobab May 2016 #84
There's ambition and there's ambition...and there is also cause and effect Armstead May 2016 #14
It absolutely does have something to do with it. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #38
of course . . . but not relevant to this article. You've taken it and made it a distraction. snowy owl May 2016 #90
. corkhead May 2016 #26
I'll tell you what's sexist tularetom May 2016 #28
Your comments merely reflect your total lack of awareness of this history of democratic candidates. Big Blue Marble May 2016 #44
..... notadmblnd May 2016 #61
Can you show me where the argument you put forth... NCTraveler May 2016 #72
That "sexism" rejoinder is so tired and so rote. bjo59 May 2016 #31
You think you are tired of it? Try living a lifetime with it. apcalc May 2016 #37
I have pmorlan1 May 2016 #45
Denying it is sexism Big Blue Marble May 2016 #51
don't bother dana_b May 2016 #66
Yes that is it. You don't even recognize it. apcalc May 2016 #81
LOL pmorlan1 May 2016 #82
Maybe it's all you recognize? You are too wrapped up in a buzz word. Lazy. Try to look beyond... snowy owl May 2016 #99
If you've lived "lifetime" of it, then you have been using failed strategies. Look inward. snowy owl May 2016 #103
This message was self-deleted by its author apcalc May 2016 #33
But that's the problem, Bernie is not "ambition-filled" which is why he's been successful. snowy owl May 2016 #86
he's losing uponit7771 May 2016 #157
Please stop making a mockery of feminism. cui bono May 2016 #147
This exactly same complain has been leveled against MANY male candidates. basselope May 2016 #152
Link and quote? tia uponit7771 May 2016 #158
Google is your friend... basselope May 2016 #167
What a whiny article. JoePhilly May 2016 #4
An ambitious woman!!11 mcar May 2016 #5
Bernie is not. Warren is not. Perhaps Merkley is not. HRC supporters used to corruption. snowy owl May 2016 #93
Bernie and Warren are not ambitious? mcar May 2016 #108
Its like they live on another fucking planet uponit7771 May 2016 #159
Ambition was a problem for Richard Nixon. Men certainly face criticism for being overly ambitious Rilgin May 2016 #139
Link and quote? tia uponit7771 May 2016 #161
Here you go, editorial discussing when ambition is too much using men Rilgin May 2016 #162
Then why is Hillary being extrapolated here vs the rest of people who did the same thing? Like uponit7771 May 2016 #163
Not all ambitious people are ambitious to a fault Rilgin May 2016 #164
Unrec - for Must Stop that Woman fever syndrome. nt BootinUp May 2016 #6
Hillary has nothing in common with working class women of all races. imagine2015 May 2016 #13
I suggest you seriously look at her voting record and history. BootinUp May 2016 #23
So you go to her customized website for bio? Whoa! That's brilliant! snowy owl May 2016 #100
She's an accomplished professional woman who has and IS working her ass off to get elected. KittyWampus May 2016 #9
Go Bernie liberal from boston May 2016 #62
Your comment proves the point that- the fact she is a woman has so far notadmblnd May 2016 #68
Former professor/amendment king/quiet victories? Clearly your worship idols. Easier than reading. snowy owl May 2016 #102
The turn argument is not sexist! scscholar May 2016 #128
Rex Murphy radical noodle May 2016 #11
This guy is a climate change denier and shill for Canada's oil industry. sufrommich May 2016 #12
Not so strange "bedfellows". The Clintons and rich Republican donors to Hillary's campaign. imagine2015 May 2016 #18
Do you wonder why a shill for Canada's oil industry would offer sufrommich May 2016 #24
Get real. she is in bed with oil-they made her larkrake May 2016 #65
Ambition is one thing. Ambition so that you will do anything to serve it is another. I don't think highprincipleswork May 2016 #15
....! And, when your husband is a former President Campaiging for you... KoKo May 2016 #19
"Ambition should be made of sterner stuff." NewImproved Deal May 2016 #47
He may not have when he started this campaign, but his ego is getting bigger every day as is his riversedge May 2016 #54
His mandate has gotten bigger. We want him to represent us, even if some of you don't. Tell me, highprincipleswork May 2016 #96
Empty reply which says nothing. Ambition/ego - "stupid" (see john oliver) snowy owl May 2016 #105
So is your reply. bye riversedge May 2016 #106
People get paid for writing this tripe? Starry Messenger May 2016 #17
I take it you're backing a big time loser against Trump. Hillary Clinton. imagine2015 May 2016 #20
The one beating her opponent like a rented mule? Yes, I am. Starry Messenger May 2016 #21
"beating like rented mule" - I don't use such comparisons. I've become kinder than that. Brutality snowy owl May 2016 #112
Beating him with one hand tied behind her back. Starry Messenger May 2016 #113
Much better. Thank you. We Sanders supporters are compassionate. snowy owl May 2016 #120
Uh-huh. Starry Messenger May 2016 #124
I take it that you're a big fan of right wing memes. cali May 2016 #27
You mean like right-wing corporatists funding Hillary? No I'm not. imagine2015 May 2016 #36
I take it that poster is a big fan of hyperbole. grasswire May 2016 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author snowy owl May 2016 #111
Bernie is the loser by 3,000,000 votes. The people have spoken redstateblues May 2016 #34
How many primaries has Bernie won since the 3,000,000 came out and it has not changed? -none May 2016 #85
3,000,000 equals 1% of population. That's a big number - not. snowy owl May 2016 #109
It sounds like you are the one backing a loser. Beacool May 2016 #94
if you've seen better prose in Cosmo, you have little understanding of good writing snowy owl May 2016 #107
This article is an absolute dumpster fire of overly-ornamented prose. Starry Messenger May 2016 #110
Me thinks you doth protest too much. snowy owl May 2016 #114
No it ain't. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #22
Right wing dog shit. Fuck that. cali May 2016 #25
"Slouching towards (Washington) to cry havoc let slip the dogs of war" Depaysement May 2016 #29
So, for the good of party unity, Clinton should withdraw? The Second Stone May 2016 #30
Does anyone disagree with this comment made by the articles writer? And if so, what? imagine2015 May 2016 #40
And she has treated him with kid gloves...... apcalc May 2016 #83
That's not a response to the comment I posted by the author imagine2015 May 2016 #95
Ditto. Good catch, Imagine. Always a distraction instead of reply. snowy owl May 2016 #117
Is this not inconsistent with his statement way back that Whimsey May 2016 #141
Prince Charles thinks that too. longship May 2016 #41
To me, she's an opportunist. She's had little legislative experience. Same with Obama. snowy owl May 2016 #116
Yup! That's part of it. longship May 2016 #122
So Barack is her lacky also? Whimsey May 2016 #142
don't miss the comments section grasswire May 2016 #42
Lord save us... NewImproved Deal May 2016 #43
California dreamin' Whimsey May 2016 #46
wow, you got in a lot of talking points for a noob. grasswire May 2016 #50
Bernie has been handled with kid gloves. Only the Bern Squad denies it. nt BootinUp May 2016 #55
lol. Yeah, cause the Clinton camp has been holding back TDale313 May 2016 #75
ok. lol. BootinUp May 2016 #76
Disagree Whimsey May 2016 #125
Campaign talking points repeated almost verbatim! imagine2015 May 2016 #57
Really? Whimsey May 2016 #127
what about the transcripts? She is a hypocrite x 1000 dana_b May 2016 #69
Still dreamin' Whimsey May 2016 #129
"Because no one in the state department, Bradley Manning, has ever compromised security" dana_b May 2016 #140
BS Whimsey May 2016 #143
omg - really?! This post is one for the books. YOU and your daughter have rights and knoe EVERYTHING dana_b May 2016 #144
I'm sorry Whimsey May 2016 #145
Brought to you by the Brock PPP initiative! BillZBubb May 2016 #91
Explain this to me Whimsey May 2016 #130
Someday we'll have a progressive/liberal woman running for President. It might be Elizabeth Warren. imagine2015 May 2016 #53
No history Whimsey May 2016 #132
I love how there's supposedly no enthusiasm for the candidate who has received more votes than all Metric System May 2016 #59
It is more pathetic that such posts are allowed on this site. N/T Big Blue Marble May 2016 #74
And who do you think is going to Republican donors for money? Clue. It isn't Sanders imagine2015 May 2016 #97
I actually think they are coming to her. Whimsey May 2016 #133
You deny he's become a rock start of sorts?Where are the 10s/1000s for HRC?Acceptance vs.Enthusiasm snowy owl May 2016 #118
Independents? Whimsey May 2016 #134
Independents, tea-party republicans, and progressive dems. He attracts them all. He's a rock star! snowy owl May 2016 #153
The liberal press? I can't imagine most Sanders supporters believe that. Metric System May 2016 #60
Utter rubbish. Beacool May 2016 #92
This article's sexist as hell. Turin_C3PO May 2016 #131
Well... Whimsey May 2016 #136
Thank you. Beacool May 2016 #138
Rex Murphy... SidDithers May 2016 #98
Hell yes, it is her turn because We the people have spoken making it her turn. Thinkingabout May 2016 #101
Nothing to do with turns/sexism. Sexism all you you got, you go with it. Better candidate=Sanders. snowy owl May 2016 #119
Besides being sexist, it's her turn because she EARNED MORE VOTES than BS did. Lil Missy May 2016 #126
and her time to LOSE AGAINST A LOSER. pansypoo53219 May 2016 #137
HAHA THIS IS THE SADDEST BERNIEBRO TEMPER TANTRUM EVAH!!! JaneyVee May 2016 #146
So many capitals, so little sense. Betty Karlson May 2016 #149
She tends toward sensationalism. Little reason but big emotion. Idolatry and loyalty. snowy owl May 2016 #154
Ditch the GE disaster that feels entitled to happen, already! Betty Karlson May 2016 #148
Clinton will have to support centrist dems and centrist republicans to win 2020. Huge problem for us snowy owl May 2016 #155
With 70% of voters to her left. I'd say there is room for an alternative approach. eom Betty Karlson May 2016 #156
Clinton kicked ass. The winner. seabeyond May 2016 #166
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary: "fused and fired...»Reply #60