2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Eager to switch from policy debates to a twitter-fueled fight about Bill & Hillary's personal life? [View all]delrem
(9,688 posts)What does "bringing up her husband's infidelity" really mean, anyway?
After all, Hillary attacked Monica, in words. Called her names. And rather than doing any analysis, Hillary's supporters continue that tradition.
Do you expect people to FORGET it?
Then what don't you expect people to forget, so as to serve your interests?
I hardly think her husband's infidelity matters to the world at large except that Bill Clinton, as POTUS, was at that time and continues to be a role model. Like it or not, he was a role model. His wife is a role model. Icons like "Bill Clinton's cigar" matter in terms of, for example, the feminist message that I had understood at the time to advise: male executives in positions of power ought not wander through the offices picking up and using the female staff. I thought that advice was a no brainer. And it is. It is.
But what do I know? Now I'm told differently by HRC-brand feminists, I'm told that those issues don't matter at all.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):