Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Time for change

(13,714 posts)

4. It is not a conspiracy theory

Reply to YouDig (Reply #3)

Wed May 18, 2016, 12:59 PM

May 2016

It is a critique of a bullshit trashing of exit polls, which are used in other countries to monitor elections, but not in this country.

It is not a conspiracy theory that our votes are counted by electronic machines that are easily manipulated for election fraud. All or almost all election experts agree on that. That is a fact, not a theory.

The only question is how often that actually happens. Exit polls can be used to monitor elections and give us an idea of how often that happens.

I responded to Nate Silver's 10 bullshit reasons why we should ignore exit polls. If you have any thoughts on why my responses are wrong, other than to call them "conspiracy theories" with no other discussion, then I'd love to hear them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

My Critique of Nate Silver’s Critique of Exit Polls [View all] Time for change May 2016 OP

bump JackRiddler May 2016 #1

This is a very important post Fearful May 2016 #2

As the "official" results grow more suspect, exit polls need to be discredited. reformist2 May 2016 #14

That's precisely why we need them as a monitor on the accuracy of our elections Time for change May 2016 #15

Looks like an entertaining conspiracy theory, but a little long of a read. YouDig May 2016 #3

It is not a conspiracy theory Time for change May 2016 #4

It is indeed that. I've come to be quite an expert by observing the good people of Bernopia. YouDig May 2016 #5

Yet do you have enough intelligence to respond to any one of my criticisms of Time for change May 2016 #7

they have a gameplan and theyre sticking to it. reddread May 2016 #13

Thank you. Excellent analysis and very easy to read/understand for us non-statisticians. 2cannan May 2016 #6

Thank you very much Time for change May 2016 #8

Nate doesn't do polling zipplewrath May 2016 #17

Ok, he makes his living by analyzing pre-election polls Time for change May 2016 #19

I appreciate you taking the time to write it out, but you still misunderstand the purpose of exits Godhumor May 2016 #9

They are not used in this country for that purpose Time for change May 2016 #10

OK, sure? Fine, exits shoud be used to predict winners Godhumor May 2016 #11

I am not pointing to first wave exit polls Time for change May 2016 #12

Those are still preliminary Godhumor May 2016 #16

They are not prelimary Time for change May 2016 #18