Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)

21. This is common fucking sense.

Reply to aspirant (Reply #20)

Wed May 18, 2016, 02:53 PM

May 2016

In the real world, someone who makes a claim provides proof. You've made a claim, then deny proof, only to demand proof that you are wrong. That's not how intellectualism works. That's how fuckwits like Glenn Beck work.

ETA Obvious troll is obvious.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

33 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Just an FYI - An injection of a third set of numbers makes shenanigans difficult. [View all] ViseGrip May 2016 OP

good point! Merryland May 2016 #1

Just remember the number 3 is divine, the Trinity aspirant May 2016 #2

Yep, the only healer. ViseGrip May 2016 #3

When everybody votes, Hillary wins the majority of the time. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #4

" When everybody votes" aspirant May 2016 #5

So, 11/19 open primaries were fixed Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #6

Prove the voting machines are unhackable. aspirant May 2016 #7

One does not prove a negative. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #8

Then prove your positive that hacking was nonexistent aspirant May 2016 #9

Do you understand the burden of proof? Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #10

I have no burden and no beasts either aspirant May 2016 #14

I see... Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #16

Prove the election was positively flawless, I'll be waiting aspirant May 2016 #18

Once again, the burden of proof is on YOU. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #19

Are these Robert's rules of communication aspirant May 2016 #20

This is common fucking sense. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #21

Do you have a universal document for the rules oF "common sense"? aspirant May 2016 #22

Go home. Dr Hobbitstein May 2016 #23

"home" a peaceful place without burdens aspirant May 2016 #25

And boom goes the dynamite...nt SidDithers May 2016 #24

A third set of numbers means nobody gets to 270 Codeine May 2016 #11

Not true. SheenaR May 2016 #12

Bernie is a strong enough candidate to be a true spoiler. nt Codeine May 2016 #13

So awesome Demsrule86 May 2016 #15

Yes, his numbers are much higher than Hillary's and they are much higher than Trump's too Time for change May 2016 #17

Maybe we're flirting with Parliamentarianism. Seems right now libdem4life May 2016 #27

It's complicated, and the Electoral College makes it even more complicated Time for change May 2016 #30

We are definitely in interesting times. libdem4life May 2016 #32

I believe Bernie would win the election demwing May 2016 #26

He has people pressure. Ultimately much more effective as his email libdem4life May 2016 #28

This is still far from over. Land of Enchantment May 2016 #29

The numbers add up to 97% Time for change May 2016 #31

Indeed. libdem4life May 2016 #33