Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: I believe the clearest explanation for the Clinton campaign's actions in NV and the ratfucking of [View all]Fresh_Start
(11,330 posts)4. I believe that the clearest explanation for the Sanderss campaigns actions in NV and the ratfucking
of the voters is:
They have decided that they can not win.
They are acknowledging that they will have to STEAL it.
Their MO is going to be BLATANT and unapologetic.
Watch as more votes disappear or are switched before your eyes.
They will do it right before your eyes and act like you are the problem
Works equally well pointing at the Sanders campaign.
Clinton won Nevada in February.
Clinton lost the county caucus
Clinton won the state caucus.
The win at the state caucus was not dispute-able
More Clinton delegates showed up than Sanders delegates.
The counts were confirmed by a bipartisan credentials committee.
The committee was composed of equal numbers of sanders and clinton supporters.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I believe the clearest explanation for the Clinton campaign's actions in NV and the ratfucking of [View all]
Vincardog
May 2016
OP
nice for a laugh. it was the sanders crowd doing all the dirty deeds the other day nt
msongs
May 2016
#2
I believe that the clearest explanation for the Sanderss campaigns actions in NV and the ratfucking
Fresh_Start
May 2016
#4
The credentials committee kept 64 Bernie delegates out to give HRC a 30 delegate lead CHEATING
Vincardog
May 2016
#14
The rules in place since 2012 allowed delegates to challenge why they were denied. The chair denied
Vincardog
May 2016
#23
You are entitled to your opinion not your own facts. Fact is they stole it for HRC on tape. Get
Vincardog
May 2016
#29
Your OP is baseless conspiracy theory. That's a fact. There's no evidence of fraud.
PeaceNikki
May 2016
#24
yes, how could Clinton possibly win 270 delegates ahead with six states to go
alcibiades_mystery
May 2016
#19
Yes you are totally right. Now please go see a therapist before you hurt someone. nt
anotherproletariat
May 2016
#22
Look it's not rocket science, it -IS- Shock Doctrine...they need an enemy on the LEFT
HereSince1628
May 2016
#30