Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)

17. Your welcome

Reply to obamanut2012 (Reply #9)

Wed May 18, 2016, 07:23 PM

May 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

41 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I believe the clearest explanation for the Clinton campaign's actions in NV and the ratfucking of [View all] Vincardog May 2016 OP

Why would they think they can't win? Have you looked at the delegate count? YouDig May 2016 #1

nice for a laugh. it was the sanders crowd doing all the dirty deeds the other day nt msongs May 2016 #2

Were you there? merrily May 2016 #27

Sigh. Skinner May 2016 #3

+1000. Metric System May 2016 #38

I believe that the clearest explanation for the Sanderss campaigns actions in NV and the ratfucking Fresh_Start May 2016 #4

The credentials committee kept 64 Bernie delegates out to give HRC a 30 delegate lead CHEATING Vincardog May 2016 #14

wrong: they kept 58 sanders delegates and 8? clinton delegates out Fresh_Start May 2016 #21

The rules in place since 2012 allowed delegates to challenge why they were denied. The chair denied Vincardog May 2016 #23

no, the chair did not deny them the right to challenge Fresh_Start May 2016 #26

You are entitled to your opinion not your own facts. Fact is they stole it for HRC on tape. Get Vincardog May 2016 #29

The fact is that Clinton won Nevada in February... Fresh_Start May 2016 #33

Maybe Bernie is just losing Renew Deal May 2016 #5

Kick for truth. They have been doing so during The Great Coast to Coast silvershadow May 2016 #6

Well I don't care who "wins" the nomination nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #7

lolz obamanut2012 May 2016 #10

I agree with you, it is hilarious nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #11

Sure you don't... SidDithers May 2016 #32

So who did you vote in your elections? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #34

I voted for John Oliver...nt SidDithers May 2016 #35

I guess our friends from the UK nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #37

Once again displaying the expert research skills... SidDithers May 2016 #41

Your "explicantion" (SIC) is full baseless conspiracy theories. PeaceNikki May 2016 #8

You explain why they are hating on the left. Vincardog May 2016 #16

Uuummm... I'm not. PeaceNikki May 2016 #18

So your reply is baseless opinion. I am good with that. Vincardog May 2016 #20

Your OP is baseless conspiracy theory. That's a fact. There's no evidence of fraud. PeaceNikki May 2016 #24

Watch the video. Appologize to me after. Thank you Vincardog May 2016 #25

There's no video in your OP. PeaceNikki May 2016 #28

Thanks for the OP! obamanut2012 May 2016 #9

Your welcome Vincardog May 2016 #17

You are very concerned. Dem2 May 2016 #12

I echo Skinner's sigh. Starry Messenger May 2016 #13

"They have decided that they can not win." TwilightZone May 2016 #15

yes, how could Clinton possibly win 270 delegates ahead with six states to go alcibiades_mystery May 2016 #19

Yes you are totally right. Now please go see a therapist before you hurt someone. nt anotherproletariat May 2016 #22

Look it's not rocket science, it -IS- Shock Doctrine...they need an enemy on the LEFT HereSince1628 May 2016 #30

BINGO nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #36

Oy BeyondGeography May 2016 #31

I have to disagree, in that Hillary has more delegates mindwalker_i May 2016 #39

Hillary is too much like Nixon, can't help herself? All in it together May 2016 #40