Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

joshcryer

(62,269 posts)

11. Maybe she would have had the entire chair not been accosted.

Reply to Bonobo (Reply #4)

Thu May 19, 2016, 10:14 AM

May 2016

Because they did a preliminary head count.

Oh, and apparently, "The State Convention shall be called to order at 9:00 a.m." So the preliminary to permanent rule change wasn't even out of order.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"We rate this claim False." -Nevada Democratic Party leaders "hijacked the process on the floor",etc [View all] bloom May 2016 OP

Politifact needs to review its methods. It is using circular logic here. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #1

I think politifact sums it up pretty well. bloom May 2016 #2

But the circular logic is very clear. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #3

Excellent point casperthegm May 2016 #5

Plus the first count is the one that took place before the 9:30 vote. bobbobbins01 May 2016 #7

^^^^ THIS Politicalsanity May 2016 #13

Also fails to mention that a head count vote is required when voice vote in inconclusive. Bonobo May 2016 #4

Yeah, with a crowd split almost 50/50 as they claim(which I would argue) bobbobbins01 May 2016 #9

Maybe she would have had the entire chair not been accosted. joshcryer May 2016 #11

except that the rule change vote was pushed through Politicalsanity May 2016 #14

They called to order at 9:00am. joshcryer May 2016 #15

There is seemingly no end to your rationalization for dishonesty. nt Bonobo May 2016 #16

What dishonesty? joshcryer May 2016 #17

Because if there's no 2/3rds majority you can't change the rules. joshcryer May 2016 #12

Everybody knows its false workinclasszero May 2016 #6

ooh is that what's called the bandwagoning technique? everybody knows -lol azurnoir May 2016 #8

It was the end of the Sanders campaign for sure. frylock May 2016 #18

I want to see Snopes' take. joshcryer May 2016 #10