Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: MSNBC admits: "We'll SUPPRESS VOTING to help CLINTON on June 7th" | Bernie Sanders [View all]bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)28. Anything including cheating to get your person the nomination..yes cheating. If the MSM
does that before the CA vote it is cheating those who have not voted.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
193 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
MSNBC admits: "We'll SUPPRESS VOTING to help CLINTON on June 7th" | Bernie Sanders [View all]
leftcoastmountains
May 2016
OP
why would June 7th be any different than what the MSM has done EVERY day of this primary ?
GreatGazoo
May 2016
#170
The CORPORATISTS ARE TRULY IN CHARGE! IT'S CALLED FASCISM! PATHETIC TURN FOR AMERICA!
CorporatistNation
May 2016
#9
And Comcast co-hosting the national convention... Remember dystopian movies like Bladerunner?
bjo59
May 2016
#131
So you believe people will be motivated to the polls even though they hear it's not necessary.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#11
I believe the people will already be on line and won't hear the announcement...
brooklynite
May 2016
#77
Anything including cheating to get your person the nomination..yes cheating. If the MSM
bkkyosemite
May 2016
#28
Why would MSNBC or any other network feel the NEED to announce the results before voting ends?
cherokeeprogressive
May 2016
#7
Same reason they took the unprecedented step of counting superdelegate votes so early this time
vintx
May 2016
#13
C'MON... TO SKEW THE RESULTS... DECREASE THE IMPETUS FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE!
CorporatistNation
May 2016
#14
It's not about the vote in California, it's called announcing the primary is over & she is the
jillan
May 2016
#111
Statistical analysis shows that voter turnout is generally lower when the weather is bad
oberliner
May 2016
#44
Oh poor you, but in CA those who stand at the polls tend to be the working poor
nadinbrzezinski
May 2016
#64
You call asking that results not be reported until all polls are closed "control"?
SusanCalvin
May 2016
#187
I can assure you that the MSM puts up what people want to hear. That's the way they make money.
Hoyt
May 2016
#189
You know you sound like very republican posters on AOL message boards circa 2001
nadinbrzezinski
May 2016
#32
Sixth person I will laugh when they go over how important it is to do GOTV
nadinbrzezinski
May 2016
#38
Tell you what, I am going to propose to my US Congressman that he introduces
nadinbrzezinski
May 2016
#89
Again, why should CA, the 8th largest economy, do that to pelase the East Cosast
nadinbrzezinski
May 2016
#132
What the fuck are you talking about? YOU can't wait for three hours and prevent a real world
nadinbrzezinski
May 2016
#143
Why would CA want to change it's traditional June election to suit you?
nadinbrzezinski
May 2016
#123
Announcing that HRC has won should she get New Jersey is the voter suppression tactic
d_legendary1
May 2016
#41
This is not about NJ or CA it's about announcing the primaries are over, Hill is the nominee.
jillan
May 2016
#115
This is much older than Sanders and you are person number eight that I will laugh
nadinbrzezinski
May 2016
#72
Every network will. About half of the logical fallacies that exist are violated in this silly thread
Dem2
May 2016
#70
I waited patiently for your silly post. You didn't read my post and now you look silly.
Dem2
May 2016
#85
Hillary is 633 Pledged Delegates SHORT of being the nominee. Why would they do this?
jillan
May 2016
#96
How do we combat this, that is the question? This is interfering with Democracy.
jillan
May 2016
#101
Hillary has 1771 pledged delegates. She needs 255 to clinch the majority of pledged delegates.
LuvLoogie
May 2016
#136
She needs 633 pledged delegates to cinch the nomination. AP showing her with 1750
jillan
May 2016
#139
You know you're not responding to that persons contention and making up your own, right?
stevenleser
May 2016
#164
LOL. What happens when WE decide the race, as we have for the last year? Will that have any effect?
mhatrw
May 2016
#158
Is this the Weaver provided spin of the week? All of a sudden with multiple primaries
stevenleser
May 2016
#166