Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
53. It is not supressing anything to hold off until it will not affect
Tue May 24, 2016, 10:37 PM
May 2016

or suppress turnout in another states. I know I know you really hate democracy, really.

Here, enjoy this old story

https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1955&dat=19810708&id=1d8hAAAAIBAJ&sjid=OaIFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5204,4461559&hl=en

One word: Bullshit. Trust Buster May 2016 #1
why would June 7th be any different than what the MSM has done EVERY day of this primary ? GreatGazoo May 2016 #170
They just can't wait for president Trump. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #2
Pathetic pmorlan1 May 2016 #3
The CORPORATISTS ARE TRULY IN CHARGE! IT'S CALLED FASCISM! PATHETIC TURN FOR AMERICA! CorporatistNation May 2016 #9
We've known all along where MSNBC stood. (Note how they captioned him.) merrily May 2016 #4
And Comcast co-hosting the national convention... Remember dystopian movies like Bladerunner? bjo59 May 2016 #131
Hey, the MSM hosted the entire primary process. delrem May 2016 #165
And by "suppress voting" you mean "announce facts"? brooklynite May 2016 #5
So you believe people will be motivated to the polls even though they hear it's not necessary. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #11
You've seen those yuge Bernie rallies WhiteTara May 2016 #20
To be fair, they aren't showing up for Sanders now either mythology May 2016 #46
who's not showing up? the 20K at his Irvine, Ca rally? or this: amborin May 2016 #97
Don't Distort The Figures SoCalMusicLover May 2016 #153
Once again, its the showing up to vote that counts... brooklynite May 2016 #173
I believe the people will already be on line and won't hear the announcement... brooklynite May 2016 #77
Here is this thing called a phone nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #88
Ok third person I will never again beiieve when you spout GOTV nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #15
This right here tazkcmo May 2016 #84
Anything including cheating to get your person the nomination..yes cheating. If the MSM bkkyosemite May 2016 #28
Bingo workinclasszero May 2016 #79
The fact is that the super delegates do not vote until the convention me b zola May 2016 #155
Since "the facts" are already being announced by our friend Chris, delrem May 2016 #168
Not to help Clinton... Mike Nelson May 2016 #6
But it affects down ballot initiatives nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #75
Hillary will not have the delegates before the convention. senz May 2016 #162
Get the word out that they are going to do this and explain jwirr May 2016 #192
Why would MSNBC or any other network feel the NEED to announce the results before voting ends? cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #7
They don't announce results before voting ends oberliner May 2016 #12
It is called the BANDWAGON EFFECT nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #22
It's not a stretch many will go to the polls after work! It's wrong! bkkyosemite May 2016 #31
Then they probably won't be watching TV oberliner May 2016 #40
Look for your phone nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #45
The results will be available whether CNN does a special about them or not oberliner May 2016 #49
Here you go nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #52
Smart phones...yes... bkkyosemite May 2016 #105
Smart phones don't provide you with election news against your will oberliner May 2016 #107
The average person looks at his or her phone 46 times every day. progressoid May 2016 #185
But if you specifically want to vote without knowing what happened in NJ oberliner May 2016 #186
Same reason they took the unprecedented step of counting superdelegate votes so early this time vintx May 2016 #13
C'MON... TO SKEW THE RESULTS... DECREASE THE IMPETUS FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE! CorporatistNation May 2016 #14
Your computer seems to be broken - it's stuck on Cap Lock all the time. COLGATE4 May 2016 #117
Ratings: which ever network promises to announce first gets the viewers Retrograde May 2016 #62
You mean 1980 nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #66
Yeah, senior moment Retrograde May 2016 #140
And is a perfect example of what I am pointing out with this point nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #141
It's not about the vote in California, it's called announcing the primary is over & she is the jillan May 2016 #111
This OP is a lie oberliner May 2016 #8
Way too many OPs here are lies Dem2 May 2016 #36
Jury Results JimDandy May 2016 #74
So they will manufacture news nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #10
No they won't oberliner May 2016 #16
YOu realize that we go over this shit every four years right? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #17
West Coast voters are not morons oberliner May 2016 #18
WHOOSH nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #21
OK oberliner May 2016 #23
That would be ideal. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #27
That would best, and that goes for November as well nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #29
And here is one of those nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #35
Wow oberliner, Eko May 2016 #42
It's very bizarre oberliner May 2016 #47
Sigh..... SusanCalvin May 2016 #51
Sure it is. Eko May 2016 #61
Good grief. SusanCalvin May 2016 #68
Only one group Eko May 2016 #71
True if you carry it that far. SusanCalvin May 2016 #171
Here you go, this is not new nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #56
. SusanCalvin May 2016 #26
Rain "depresses" the vote. I guess that's a conspiracy too. Hoyt May 2016 #34
As usual I expect you to laugh at actual statistical analysis nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #37
So you think news should be surpressed? Hoyt May 2016 #43
We go though this same shitty discussion every four years nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #48
Don't care what it's called, should news be surpressed who/whomever it favors? Hoyt May 2016 #50
It is not supressing anything to hold off until it will not affect nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #53
Waiting until all polls are closed is not suppressing. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #54
What if I knew something very damaging about a candidate Eko May 2016 #119
Given US History... when at tmes took WEEKS for votes to be known nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #124
You do realize it would get out anyways right? Eko May 2016 #126
Germany has dealt with this by making those leaks a federal crime nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #129
That would go over real well. Eko May 2016 #135
Hey little brother I got that ilegally nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #142
If I was the one counting them. Eko May 2016 #144
Ok you want to risk time in the pokey, go for it nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #146
Personally? Eko May 2016 #148
Yes, you and people like you nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #149
LOL HarmonyRockets May 2016 #161
Of course that wouldn't be OK. SusanCalvin May 2016 #172
I thought you were a journalist...... kerry-is-my-prez May 2016 #127
I am nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #128
Statistical analysis shows that voter turnout is generally lower when the weather is bad oberliner May 2016 #44
So true, not to mention folks could vote early, even by mail. I'm never standing Hoyt May 2016 #58
Oh poor you, but in CA those who stand at the polls tend to be the working poor nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #64
Peace. Hoyt May 2016 #78
We currently have no control over the weather. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #63
We currently have no control over the rain. nt SusanCalvin May 2016 #60
Or the news, or we shouldn't. Hoyt May 2016 #177
You call asking that results not be reported until all polls are closed "control"? SusanCalvin May 2016 #187
I can assure you that the MSM puts up what people want to hear. That's the way they make money. Hoyt May 2016 #189
This is sort of true. SusanCalvin May 2016 #190
If your point is legitimate, why lie about it? Corporate666 May 2016 #19
Some are so hooked on rage endorphins that they're self-medicating. LuvLoogie May 2016 #30
Reporting facts is voter suppression?? Gothmog May 2016 #24
Seven person I will laugh when they go GOTV nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #39
Bernie says he's in until the convention, so no big deal. How oasis May 2016 #25
You know you sound like very republican posters on AOL message boards circa 2001 nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #32
At least you know I'm not paid to recruit in this joint. oasis May 2016 #112
I am just pointing that you do sound that way nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #114
If by "conservadem" you mean "Democrats dedicated to saving oasis May 2016 #118
Nope CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRAT nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #120
Most on this site used to be firmly against the continuing slide to the right vintx May 2016 #178
If by not fully embracing Che and Hugo Chavez signals a DU slide oasis May 2016 #183
Thanks for the demonstration nt vintx May 2016 #184
God forbid they should report things. Eko May 2016 #33
Sixth person I will laugh when they go over how important it is to do GOTV nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #38
I understand where you are coming from. Eko May 2016 #55
Yes, because if they do not, like it does every fucking four years nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #57
I see what you are saying Eko May 2016 #67
IMO, when states on the east and west coast are concerned nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #69
Really really really Eko May 2016 #76
Yes, really and hearings are held in Congress every so often nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #81
Tell you what, Eko May 2016 #87
Tell you what, I am going to propose to my US Congressman that he introduces nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #89
Cool, Eko May 2016 #93
Poor, poor you, you will need to lock out every time zone nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #95
Easier to block off one state Eko May 2016 #99
You are missing this, and you are an enemy of democracy by the way, nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #102
an enemy of democracy? Eko May 2016 #109
Anybody who wants to suppress turnout is nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #113
Care to show me where Eko May 2016 #116
You want that released when precints are still open nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #122
You cant just Eko May 2016 #125
Again, why should CA, the 8th largest economy, do that to pelase the East Cosast nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #132
Why should the worlds largest economy Eko May 2016 #134
What the fuck are you talking about? YOU can't wait for three hours and prevent a real world nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #143
So why not just Eko May 2016 #145
To please you? Why should we do that? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #147
So changing the states election Eko May 2016 #121
Why would CA want to change it's traditional June election to suit you? nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #123
To fix a problem you are having. Eko May 2016 #150
Alas we also have it every four years during the General Eleciton nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #151
Its been fun, but its over. Eko May 2016 #152
Oh please do put me on ignore nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #154
No, I cant do that. Eko May 2016 #159
Announcing that HRC has won should she get New Jersey is the voter suppression tactic d_legendary1 May 2016 #41
Yep. SusanCalvin May 2016 #59
This is not about NJ or CA it's about announcing the primaries are over, Hill is the nominee. jillan May 2016 #115
Exactly my point! d_legendary1 May 2016 #174
Damn, just every one picking on Sanders right? seabeyond May 2016 #65
This is much older than Sanders and you are person number eight that I will laugh nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #72
Lordy Nadin, starting another list? seabeyond May 2016 #80
If you are an enemy of democracy you are not a friend of mine nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #83
Regardless of your enemy of whatever, no, we aren't friends. seabeyond May 2016 #90
Good, nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #91
Every network will. About half of the logical fallacies that exist are violated in this silly thread Dem2 May 2016 #70
Really? tell that to Jimmy Carter nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #73
I waited patiently for your silly post. You didn't read my post and now you look silly. Dem2 May 2016 #85
Whatever, I did read it nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #86
The media can't withhold football scores anymore oberliner May 2016 #92
They could, BY LAW do that for elections nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #94
same exact thing is done in criminal investigations too.. lakeguy May 2016 #181
I know, I know nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #182
Like MSNBC can afford to alienate viewers even further ... how foolish is this. pacalo May 2016 #82
Hillary is 633 Pledged Delegates SHORT of being the nominee. Why would they do this? jillan May 2016 #96
All these fools are adding the supers nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #98
How do we combat this, that is the question? This is interfering with Democracy. jillan May 2016 #101
People have been trying since at least the Reagan election nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #103
I think our only chance is to contact DWS, seriously. jillan May 2016 #108
I am to the point that I do not care what happens nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #110
fascist M$M, and in the case of MSNBC/Comcast, headed by a HRC donor amborin May 2016 #100
This goes back to 1980 nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #104
This East Coaster PATRICK May 2016 #163
I have no choice, working media nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #175
If you count it that way creeksneakers2 May 2016 #130
Process, neither will reach PDs nadinbrzezinski May 2016 #133
I admire your constitution vintx May 2016 #179
Hillary has 1771 pledged delegates. She needs 255 to clinch the majority of pledged delegates. LuvLoogie May 2016 #136
She needs 633 pledged delegates to cinch the nomination. AP showing her with 1750 jillan May 2016 #139
^^^ POST OF THE DAY ^^^ Jack Bone May 2016 #156
Sure, if straw men are your thing. nt stevenleser May 2016 #169
You know you're not responding to that persons contention and making up your own, right? stevenleser May 2016 #164
DEM nominee must have at least 2383 delegates underthematrix May 2016 #157
I love how that person didn't respond to your actual point. stevenleser May 2016 #167
That's okay. Maybe I forgot to add anti-Hillary Dark Matter Delegates. LuvLoogie May 2016 #188
K & R AzDar May 2016 #106
K&R nt silvershadow May 2016 #137
Lie. JoePhilly May 2016 #138
LOL. What happens when WE decide the race, as we have for the last year? Will that have any effect? mhatrw May 2016 #158
At what minute mark does 'MSNBC admit' lovemydog May 2016 #160
Is this the Weaver provided spin of the week? All of a sudden with multiple primaries stevenleser May 2016 #166
You know something, you're correct Dem2 May 2016 #191
Bernie supporters again collecting grievances regarding the process underthematrix May 2016 #176
Man, June 7 is going to be funner than I thought nt firebrand80 May 2016 #180
This thread is propaganda and not true at all - if anything Weaver is sleazing on the rules Dem2 May 2016 #193
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»MSNBC admits: "We'll SUPP...»Reply #53