Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Press Virginia

(2,329 posts)
127. Not only that, the SD had 3 methods that were listed in the IG Report
Thu May 26, 2016, 04:37 PM
May 2016

one was printing them out.
Additionally, there are other approved retention methods including PDF, Floppy Disk/Memory Sticks even photographs and microfiche are acceptable under some circumstances.

And, get this, HRC had people working for her.. they were recording her TV Shows, getting her Tea, finding her glasses....maybe one of them could have done some e-mail retention for HRC a couple days a week

Maddow's shameful lies last night [View all] lagomorph777 May 2016 OP
Berners just love dumb beaurocratic rules and red tape, don't they? Almost like a fetish. YouDig May 2016 #1
Wow. Of all the lame hilly fan posts defending your dear leader, this is the weakest. cali May 2016 #3
She didn't file her TPS reports. Outrage! YouDig May 2016 #7
Didn't you get that memo? realmirage May 2016 #106
TPS haha! jzodda May 2016 #111
I can't stand the enabling. it will be sweet when the fbi is done. roguevalley May 2016 #123
Jury voted to leave. merrily May 2016 #25
Oh, we're back to the alert wars? lagomorph777 May 2016 #28
When did they stop? merrily May 2016 #95
What??? North Korea? Lol cali May 2016 #43
Wow, "red-tape" "bureaucratic rules"...to protect the lives of American agents lagomorph777 May 2016 #9
No American agents' lives were put at risk because she didn't file her TPS reports. YouDig May 2016 #13
Newsweek: Hillary Clinton and Her Staff may have Compromised Counterterrorism Ops with 'Sloppy' Com. w4rma May 2016 #131
Exactly. Sounds like the policies -- not law -- were burdensome. My company has policies I work Hoyt May 2016 #10
A-henh. mac56 May 2016 #84
You do know that she's asking to run this bureaucracy, right? lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #97
I thought you people said Carni May 2016 #112
Good point. Berners care about irrelevant red tape, but when it comes to an election, YouDig May 2016 #113
On a thread defending Hillary's "rule breaking" Carni May 2016 #116
well...succinct and pointed. Good job! n/t Sheepshank May 2016 #121
Yeah! Those stupid laws and rules and regulations, who needs em! AgingAmerican May 2016 #114
Hey look... Buddyblazon May 2016 #120
Rules "don't apply" to royalty, do they? (nt) w4rma May 2016 #130
Rachel Maddow is the sharpest researcher on television, hands down. Trust Buster May 2016 #2
Gotta love Rachel! workinclasszero May 2016 #4
And, last night she was especially brilliant (not to mention LOL funny). Surya Gayatri May 2016 #87
I watched her once many years ago. I was not impressed. cali May 2016 #5
Well you like Bernie so... Demsrule86 May 2016 #18
Why yes, I like my Senator. Along with 85% of the voters in my state cali May 2016 #34
Apparently a lot of Sanders supporters believe she's in the tank for Hilly CorkySt.Clair May 2016 #60
I don't watch her so I couldn't tell you. cali May 2016 #68
Holy smokes. Duval May 2016 #104
I was a big fan for years while she was on the radio. She was progressive. Then she moved to rhett o rick May 2016 #133
Doubt if she'd be impressed... CherokeeDem May 2016 #58
Her show and Talking Points Memo inchhigh May 2016 #66
i'm with you barbtries May 2016 #99
This. Smartest person on TV, and one of the smartest pundits anywhere. YouDig May 2016 #6
Yep. nc4bo May 2016 #8
Well that would make her incapable of lying, right? JackRiddler May 2016 #44
It's the only news show I watch these days. JohnnyRingo May 2016 #103
I never cared for that format/approach she presented 2banon May 2016 #118
I didn't know she had a candidate... JohnnyRingo May 2016 #134
Same here, it's totally why I'm not a regular listener of Amy Goodman anymore, in fact not for years 2banon May 2016 #138
Rachel did a great job on this issue last night Gothmog May 2016 #119
Too bad she sold her soul for gold like others we know. rhett o rick May 2016 #132
The sheer number of good liberals who have been attacked sufrommich May 2016 #11
Good liberals do not tell massive lies. lagomorph777 May 2016 #12
She told the truth Demsrule86 May 2016 #19
Isn't it amazing... JohnnyRingo May 2016 #135
pales next to the number of hacks exposed for what they are reddread May 2016 #14
the sheer number of good liberals who have been attacked, vilified mountain grammy May 2016 #23
I agree. If a media personality says anything that a Sanders supporter doesn't agree with, then Trust Buster May 2016 #36
Only media personalities are good liberals. JackRiddler May 2016 #47
+1 uponit7771 May 2016 #79
And they replaced them all with Joe Scabb. JoePhilly May 2016 #91
When I think of Goodall, Lewis etc, their obvious unfounded, misdirected hatred is quite putrid. Sheepshank May 2016 #122
Every word was true Demsrule86 May 2016 #15
Nobody else had a server in their house pinebox May 2016 #38
Same old distraction, ignore the server being at home in a closet, claim others did it. Alex4Martinez May 2016 #46
Your statement is misleading angrychair May 2016 #41
Truly shocking the gargantuan fall in integrity Maddow has suffered this primary. stillwaiting May 2016 #16
Me too. lagomorph777 May 2016 #20
Everyone who dislikes Demsrule86 May 2016 #24
Please do tell of his lack of integrity..... peace13 May 2016 #59
You should get rid of your sig line. Fawke Em May 2016 #73
Or at least put a sarcasm smiley behind it. progressoid May 2016 #124
Perhaps she just really, really likes her job and desires to keep it. -nt- NorthCarolina May 2016 #74
Amazing what money can buy, huh? nt valerief May 2016 #94
She threw her journalistic integrity out the window. reformist2 May 2016 #140
I feel the same. Enthusiast May 2016 #144
Nobody gives a shit about it except Bernie folks upaloopa May 2016 #17
Ah, you have so little faith in the voters of CA, MT, NJ, SD, ND, and DC lagomorph777 May 2016 #22
Bernie is the one trying to dismiss the votes Demsrule86 May 2016 #27
It is the top news story. cali May 2016 #37
Speaking of denial! JackRiddler May 2016 #48
And only Camp Weathervane gives a shit about that sellout Maddow. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #52
As Bernie said nobody cares about the damn emails. Thinkingabout May 2016 #21
Bernie is magnanimous. lagomorph777 May 2016 #26
The shameful lies, Rachal under the bus, she has destroyed the CT. Thinkingabout May 2016 #31
Don't worry, there will be another one soon to take its place. randome May 2016 #33
Yes, we know CT's has a purpose, makes the truth really welcome. Thinkingabout May 2016 #39
so what was the lie? DrDan May 2016 #29
No, not merely a lie of omission (still a lie) but a lie of comission. lagomorph777 May 2016 #32
I still do not see a lie in the OP DrDan May 2016 #83
Then your shell of denial is too thick to penetrate lagomorph777 May 2016 #107
look - I tried to be respectful - no personal insults DrDan May 2016 #108
OK, please read this lagomorph777 May 2016 #109
Sanders supporters have quickly become Clintons best asset in the primary. NCTraveler May 2016 #30
And completely ignoring the fact eggman67 May 2016 #35
You are the eggman! lagomorph777 May 2016 #40
Exactly. onecaliberal May 2016 #45
FOIA is to make sure that all government records are public property MisterP May 2016 #49
And her fans here are oblivious to the fact that although Bernie has been nice vintx May 2016 #86
Goo goo g'joob ;) n/t eggman67 May 2016 #100
Doesn't matter. tazkcmo May 2016 #42
I blocked two 'Nobody Cares' posters yesterday Trajan May 2016 #53
Nice! Dem2 May 2016 #50
Impenetrable wall of denial; fact-free zone lagomorph777 May 2016 #54
It's nice to see people who I don't actually know much about rooting for our side to lose Dem2 May 2016 #56
I am rooting for a Democrat to win lagomorph777 May 2016 #61
Logical fallacies are b******* Dem2 May 2016 #90
I am amused that the Sanders people are throwing Rachel Maddow under the bus Gothmog May 2016 #51
Okay, got it: you approve of lying sellouts. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #55
I stand with Rachel Maddow Gothmog May 2016 #71
She's been sitting next to Brian Williams too long. CrispyQ May 2016 #57
And seriously...look at him. peace13 May 2016 #65
Try not to hurt yourselves with sll this outrage. hrmjustin May 2016 #62
My outrage isn't hurting anybody. lagomorph777 May 2016 #63
Don't you worry. hrmjustin May 2016 #64
Not in the GE. lagomorph777 May 2016 #69
Too bad your candidate didn't have the depth of support you wish he had. hrmjustin May 2016 #77
Maddow will be a lot of fun to watch as she eats her crow. gordianot May 2016 #67
I often wonder how she would report on a Bernie GE run. GreenPartyVoter May 2016 #75
I haven't been able to watch her for months. Cobalt Violet May 2016 #70
Stick a fork in it, Maddow is done. Baitball Blogger May 2016 #72
I'll stick with Maddow and her well-researched opinions. n/t Lil Missy May 2016 #76
What was really funny was how Lawrence O'Donnell debunked 2cannan May 2016 #78
I did notice that. lagomorph777 May 2016 #80
But Hillary shouldn't have to follow the rules! Silver_Witch May 2016 #81
It's impossible not to hear Valley Girl inflections when I read this lagomorph777 May 2016 #82
her candidate is threatened so she will say whatever it takes dana_b May 2016 #85
Post reads pretty much like a fox news report The_Casual_Observer May 2016 #88
I sat through that meandering 10 minute intro about Clint Eastwood's chair only to find out corkhead May 2016 #89
Like her banker pals, Hillary is too big to fail or jail. nt JEB May 2016 #92
Rachel Maddow is a con artist Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #93
Her reputation is in the toilet. n/t Skwmom May 2016 #96
Hillary is the victim of her own bad judgements. B Calm May 2016 #98
Rachel Maddow did a great job on this issue last night Gothmog May 2016 #101
Rachel is a great way of cutting through bullshit and getting to the point. Bravo. MariaThinks May 2016 #102
Her flagrant disregard for security concerns is far worse than exposing the secrets cpwm17 May 2016 #125
TRMS deathrind May 2016 #105
Stick a fork in her. 1/2 of the liberals are done with her propaganda. jillan May 2016 #110
More excuses for HRC. Is she entitled to flout the rules others are required to follow? EndElectoral May 2016 #115
I only watch talking heads in the morning now d_legendary1 May 2016 #117
Rachel always gets giddy and excited when defending HRC left-of-center2012 May 2016 #126
Not only that, the SD had 3 methods that were listed in the IG Report Press Virginia May 2016 #127
Oh, my gosh Art_from_Ark May 2016 #136
Maybe. Certainly they could work on retaining her emails in Press Virginia May 2016 #137
those were HER(Maddows) emails MFM008 May 2016 #128
Rachel wants to be HRC's press secretary so bad she can taste it DebbieCDC May 2016 #129
Maddow shocked me Thurs night too grasswire May 2016 #139
I guess Money is enough to gamble your Integrity on a Clinton screw-up Sky Masterson May 2016 #142
rachel's attempt to 'splain for hillary hopemountain May 2016 #141
It's Rachel. She used to be good. Enthusiast May 2016 #143
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Maddow's shameful lies la...»Reply #127