Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
13. I don't think she would quality for even a low level security clearance.
Thu May 26, 2016, 06:50 PM
May 2016

That, to me, is more telling than what the RW morons in Congress would do to her if she were an AG nominee. But the truth is that, even in a normal, representative and elected** Congress, she simply couldn't be okayed for Sec of State or any office that involved national security. That much is clear from the OIG report. She cavalierly and knowingly endangered national security documents and information, and furthermore took measures to avoid scrutiny of what she was doing.

But what barfs up the works really badly for her is that she couldn't even work as a janitor in the Secretary of State's office. Given what's in some of her emails, that went through her privately installed, insecure server, and her obstruction of inquiry about it, and her lies about it, she would never get any level of security clearance.

Who cares what the RW morons in Congress would say? This is Obama's OIG and John Kerry's cleanly run State Department. They wouldn't give her a security clearance, knowing what they know now. Or if they did, it would be malfeasance on their part. She can't be trusted. She broke all the rules. She probably broke laws. She was communicating with a guy on national security issues whom Obama had forbidden to work in the State Department. He had no security clearance. He was passing her NSA documents (and where he got them nobody knows). She encouraged him. And he was working as a private consultant at the private Clinton Foundation!

Not even as a janitor.

--------------------------------

**(Most of our 8%-approval-rating Congress was not elected, in my opinion. That's what all those 'TRADE SECRET' voting machines all over the land have been used for, along with s/electing some real RW low-lifes to a number of state houses.)

Our Very Own Chuck Toad Finally Sees The Light of Day! CorporatistNation May 2016 #1
Andrea Looked As Though She Was About To... Cry..... CorporatistNation May 2016 #5
Mika, too. grasswire May 2016 #11
Looks like the media is finally wishing up to what is actually going on with this issue... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #23
And We Cannot Wait For All The Head In The Sand DENIERS To See It! CorporatistNation May 2016 #34
Chuck, no one could get confirmed for Attorney General right now. Tal Vez May 2016 #2
yeah, gut reaction here, but wow that seemed like a dumb statement. nt JCanete May 2016 #32
Just another right wing troll at a right wing network. Glamrock May 2016 #3
So MSNBC Is A "Right Wing" Network? Chuck Todd Has Been For Which Candidate The Entire Primary? CorporatistNation May 2016 #6
I forgot the sarcasm tag.....doh! Glamrock May 2016 #8
Move over Joe Scabb ... meet new liberal heart thrub ... Chuck Todd!!! JoePhilly May 2016 #4
Rachael Maddow bad,Chuck Todd good. sufrommich May 2016 #9
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #17
Yes, ArtISLife... THIS Has Been A FUN Day With This Only Being The Beginning As The Walls Begin To CorporatistNation May 2016 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author artislife May 2016 #28
Yep. I'm flag someone else remembers that stats thing. Hassin Bin Sober May 2016 #33
Full bullshit. seabeyond May 2016 #7
Perhaps you can expand on exactly what you think is... tex-wyo-dem May 2016 #24
Nope. seabeyond May 2016 #25
Heilemann and Halperin just said on MSNBC that she lied... grasswire May 2016 #10
Why does Hillary shake her head no when she repeats the phrase: "It was allowed."? sorechasm May 2016 #12
She's modelling what she wants viewers reactions to be... HereSince1628 May 2016 #15
So, she means to say 'I am a victim', but it still looks like: 'Don't believe a word I am saying.' sorechasm May 2016 #16
two levels of message...the BIG message is in the body language HereSince1628 May 2016 #18
I don't think she would quality for even a low level security clearance. Peace Patriot May 2016 #13
Well Said! No Need To Say More... People Should Watch The Video Which Is Self Explanatory... CorporatistNation May 2016 #14
As POTUS, she wouldn't have to worry about qualifying for a security clearance. politicaljunkie41910 May 2016 #19
Apparently 'access to classified information' by hackers comes with the job of Hillary as SOS. sorechasm May 2016 #21
You mean it would be okay with you if the President was fundamentally distrusted by... Peace Patriot May 2016 #30
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe May 2016 #20
Wow. That video was brutal. Her lies were exposed , she violated the official Records Act Autumn May 2016 #22
YES... And Email Was Just Getting Started In Powell's Time... This Was Devastating According To CorporatistNation May 2016 #27
'wasn't the best choice' John Poet May 2016 #29
So Bernie was right again, she isn't qualified. nt Live and Learn May 2016 #31
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Chuck Todd: "Because of T...»Reply #13