Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
So, Hillary had a server at her house [View all] TexasMommaWithAHat May 2016 OP
dude, she could have done that on any server. mikeysnot May 2016 #1
In fact, it stands to reason that using a secure server would have made hiding something easier. Garrett78 May 2016 #5
Very true re the corporate bucks. TexasMommaWithAHat May 2016 #6
No you can't..... Bob41213 May 2016 #8
opinion noted.... mikeysnot May 2016 #60
You're wrong. There is no audit trail of State Department emails housed on her private server. Avalux May 2016 #9
No, unsecure servers handling sensitive State Department communications Maedhros May 2016 #11
there is no such thing as a secure server.... mikeysnot May 2016 #16
There are degrees of security. Maedhros May 2016 #19
I work in the industry mikeysnot May 2016 #20
So do I, and nobody suggests throwing up our hands and giving up. Maedhros May 2016 #22
oooh-K mikeysnot May 2016 #24
Yeah, that was a little odd. lagomorph777 May 2016 #54
Don't know why he ignored you so quickly ThirdWayToTheHighway May 2016 #56
It was on the news.... mikeysnot May 2016 #58
So do I. And guess what... vintx May 2016 #33
You assume way too much. mikeysnot May 2016 #51
So what's the reason for downplaying the reckless manner vintx May 2016 #70
Right. Like SIPRnet and JWICS. Fawke Em May 2016 #49
Next! mikeysnot May 2016 #52
That wasn't a hack. Fawke Em May 2016 #67
Sooo you are saying it wasn't compromised??????!!!!!!! mikeysnot May 2016 #69
Yeah, no. yodermon May 2016 #29
Breathtaking hubris. vintx May 2016 #34
No she couldn't have done that on any server. You seriously don't know what you are talking pdsimdars May 2016 #57
Opinion noted.... mikeysnot May 2016 #59
Who among the candidates wants all of their communications to be public? Tal Vez May 2016 #2
too late for that. Hiraeth May 2016 #3
It's the law. Keep your personal stuff on your personal email. TexasMommaWithAHat May 2016 #4
None of the other candidates left office with huge numbers of documents that the rules required mikehiggins May 2016 #7
I hear you. Maybe I'm just having trouble imagining Tal Vez May 2016 #12
Kissinger is now Hillary Clinton's buddy. Peace Patriot May 2016 #42
What part of "it's the LAW" don't you understand? IdaBriggs May 2016 #10
Everyone should follow the law. Tal Vez May 2016 #13
Oddly, tens of thousands of people obey these laws everyday without IdaBriggs May 2016 #18
I am confident that each and every person who has worked for the government longer than a week Tal Vez May 2016 #23
The people who are upset are the ones who know what they are talking IdaBriggs May 2016 #25
I appreciate your spending so much time on that response, Tal Vez May 2016 #28
Let's put it this way. Suppose you're interviewing candidates vintx May 2016 #35
you know, to some extent, I can agree with you and if she weren't running for President Hiraeth May 2016 #26
I can answer that question. Tal Vez May 2016 #31
because he is not NOW under investigation and may NEVER be while she is ALREADY CURRENTLY Hiraeth May 2016 #37
Am I with you? Tal Vez May 2016 #46
Pretty sure the term is DEMOCRATIC Socialist Hiraeth May 2016 #53
It's the term "socialist" that stings. Tal Vez May 2016 #55
I disagree but no lengthy reply from my phone. Hiraeth May 2016 #64
Your disagreement is noted. Tal Vez May 2016 #65
The OIG is not the GOP. The FBI is not the GOP. Peace Patriot May 2016 #43
I disagree. Any nominee will be a target. Tal Vez May 2016 #44
Your argument does not hold water... ljm2002 May 2016 #47
If the Republicans control either the Senate or the House, Tal Vez May 2016 #50
What you say may be true... ljm2002 May 2016 #61
I don't think that any of this is very complicated. Tal Vez May 2016 #62
All of which is fine and dandy... ljm2002 May 2016 #66
I see. You want a more limited answer. Tal Vez May 2016 #68
Or easier still, keep your private emails on a seperate account floppyboo May 2016 #39
This national security scandal is not going away, she needs to drop out now so the B Calm May 2016 #14
SPOT ON. Bob41213 May 2016 #17
Remember, this was back when Sarah Palin and other politicians used private emails to skirt FOIA. TheBlackAdder May 2016 #15
I find it very telling. nt vintx May 2016 #36
VOLUMES. Hiraeth May 2016 #38
Principles? Naaah... Integrity? Hell no... vintx May 2016 #41
I'm compelled to conclude you know very little of servers and networks. LanternWaste May 2016 #21
Hubris. Rules only appy to the little people. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #27
If she were a Republican, this would be termed a "rogue operation" RufusTFirefly May 2016 #30
What would happen if the fiberoptic network went down? JonathanRackham May 2016 #32
re: "why did she have a private server installed" thesquanderer May 2016 #40
She installed it too. Pulled the cables, Darb May 2016 #45
LOL, I highly doubt that democrattotheend May 2016 #72
I'll shut off my VPN now Dem2 May 2016 #48
Either that or "protecting national security is so inconvenient" lumberjack_jeff May 2016 #63
I agree, although I doubt she actually had anything to hide democrattotheend May 2016 #71
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So, Hillary had a server ...»Reply #34