2016 Postmortem

treestar

(82,383 posts)

54. Legally they are

Reply to Nuclear Unicorn (Original post)

Sat May 28, 2016, 04:57 PM

May 2016

They have not been accused of any particular crimes and had none proved against them. Just not likely their politics does not make other people "criminals."

It's just not as easy to prove a legal case as people want to think, especially when they are highly partisan.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

77 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I would like to extend my apologies to George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and their administration. [View all] Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 OP

Sarcasm right? Dustlawyer May 2016 #1

Yes Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #4

i hope you arent serious historian May 2016 #2

It was sarcasm leveraging an oft heard defense Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #7

By that standard ... FreakinDJ May 2016 #3

Please tell me this isn't an idiotic attempt to equate eGhazi with 9/11 and Iraq. nt geek tragedy May 2016 #5

Basically? Yes. See Here BootinUp May 2016 #11

Admitted without apology. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #13

17 more days of this. Ugh nt geek tragedy May 2016 #14

Yeah, I'm sure it will all go away once we transition to the GE. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #15

Here it will. Those who want to undermine the Democratic nominee geek tragedy May 2016 #17

So, you're hoping for enforced silence to cover for conscience. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #18

No, I want to Clinton to defeat Trump and anyone who disagrees geek tragedy May 2016 #20

To hell with facts and standards and principles, so long as we're winning like Charlie Sheen. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #21

Failing to embrace the Fox News narrative is not evidence geek tragedy May 2016 #22

Fox news isn't the Inspector General or the FBI. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #23

17 more days. You'll always have Discussionist. nt geek tragedy May 2016 #24

And when will we have integrity? Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #29

Some of us already have it nt geek tragedy May 2016 #33

Not on the side of the presumptive nominee. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #39

Once again the truth is opposite of your claims. Bye nt geek tragedy May 2016 #47

So you guys keep saying in between posts praying for the suppression of dissent but you Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #49

There are plenty of forums where people can make posts that contribute to a Trump victory. BzaDem May 2016 #57

The only one contributing to Trump's victory is the Hillary camp. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #62

If you aren't voting for her in the fall, then your statement is false. BzaDem May 2016 #63

Enjoy your Cheney 2.0 Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #64

Perhaps you think Clinton is worse than Trump? BzaDem May 2016 #65

I think Clinton is worse than a wide array of genuine Democrats that could actually beat Trump. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #66

A wide array of other Democrats aren't going to win the primary BzaDem May 2016 #67

Because of the machine politics of the Clintons. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #68

I want to defeat that lunatic too and just happen to think Hillary cant possibly do it. libtodeath May 2016 #30

Bashing the Democratic nominee won't help defeat trump nt geek tragedy May 2016 #34

It will not hurt it either. TimPlo May 2016 #41

They'll be patrolling the Bernie Sanders group like U-boats. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #35

17 days until the great purge. cpwm17 May 2016 #31

See you in December nt geek tragedy May 2016 #32

War and mass-murder for fun and profit. cpwm17 May 2016 #36

Right to the point. Thank you. bjo59 May 2016 #53

Well said. bjo59 May 2016 #52

17 days until Hillary Derangement Syndrome Hortensis May 2016 #56

Hillary Derangement Syndrome: cpwm17 May 2016 #60

They used to call it Bush Derangement Syndrome to explain away those who railed against Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #69

eGhazi TwilightZone May 2016 #25

you've noticed that too? it seems everytime there a new Bernie 'scandal' azurnoir May 2016 #37

are you sure you are posting on the correct site? DrDan May 2016 #6

You missed the sarcasm tag :) pinebox May 2016 #16

God I love sarcasm as a tool to cast aside the curtain of intellectual dishonesty nt tymorial May 2016 #8

Silly. Trust Buster May 2016 #9

damn shame heaven05 May 2016 #10

We are all criminal right wingers now. PowerToThePeople May 2016 #12

Laws are for little people. The elections are rigged. onecaliberal May 2016 #19

17 days and we can all pretend we have a viable candidate insta8er May 2016 #26

No problem rock May 2016 #27

Did you apologize to Bush, Cheney, Rumsfield, et al? None were indicted, after all. Scuba May 2016 #70

Well, you got me me there. No. rock May 2016 #71

Hitler was never indicted, to the best of my knowledge. Citing Hillary's not being indicted .... Scuba May 2016 #72

My other choice is to offer proof that she is innocent rock May 2016 #73

You have othere choices. Perhaps you should give them additional consideration. Scuba May 2016 #74

Find the person rock May 2016 #75

To be fair... tazkcmo May 2016 #76

That rapscallion rock May 2016 #77

Might as well apologize to Kissinger too! hootinholler May 2016 #28

I like when people equate torture and mass-murder to an email server Dem2 May 2016 #38

The subject at hand vote for the war and has sold weapons to the most despotic regimes Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #40

President Obama isn't up for reelection Dem2 May 2016 #42

If she lacks the courage and integrity to do the right thing she should step aside. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #43

You forgot: Oligarch Third Way DLC Corporatist Triangulation Corporate shill Bankster Warmonger Dem2 May 2016 #45

What about Libya, Honduras? Those people don't count? Seeinghope May 2016 #46

Strawman Dem2 May 2016 #48

I know all those dead, homeless and maimed people don't mean anything. Seeinghope May 2016 #50

If they meant enough to you you would know Hortensis May 2016 #58

Why do you assume that I don't? Easier for your conscience? Seeinghope May 2016 #59

The bloody, murderous regime-change policies of the U.S. (and no one can argue that bjo59 May 2016 #55

Second paragraph says SARACSM. Funny! Letting one set of criminals off doesn't make letting others Seeinghope May 2016 #44

This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow May 2016 #51

Legally they are treestar May 2016 #54

Let me guess, they said TransitJohn May 2016 #61