Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Caught with her pants down, she still cannot tell the truth. AtomicKitten May 2016 #1
Perfectly said Atomic Kitten. MuseRider May 2016 #13
...!100++++ 840high May 2016 #24
Such a great choice we have. Fantastic Anarchist May 2016 #38
Look At These Solemn Faces On Morning Joe With Mika, Andrea Mitchell And Chuck Todd Among Others.. CorporatistNation May 2016 #73
Some basic research (and journalistic integrity) by MSM should have long ago revealed HRCs lies. leveymg May 2016 #79
Some basic research and the NY Times Sparkly May 2016 #84
It's not the server that's illegal, it's the classified information placed on it. That's a felony. leveymg May 2016 #87
No classified information was "placed on it." Sparkly May 2016 #88
Not according to the joint statement of the DOS and Intel Commun. IGs leveymg May 2016 #90
Key Word: "Retroactively." Sparkly May 2016 #94
EO13526 sect 1.4 Press Virginia May 2016 #97
None of that is germaine. leveymg May 2016 #98
Except for the 114 e-mails that HRC personally authored that were Press Virginia May 2016 #93
"Classified upon creation" Sparkly May 2016 #95
EO 13526 spells out what is classified upon creation Press Virginia May 2016 #96
Your response is not on point and is insulting. nt leveymg May 2016 #99
Classified upon creation is not only covered in the law,... HooptieWagon Jun 2016 #102
Is it any surprise why she didn't want an IG at State? Yurovsky May 2016 #2
I can't get over the arrogance and self-entitlement of all of this. polly7 May 2016 #4
Yep, that's the thing that gets lost... Yurovsky May 2016 #10
Apparently, there is no price too high for us to pay... dchill May 2016 #78
Very well said... findrskeep Jun 2016 #101
The Edge of Legality Octafish May 2016 #5
And THAT is a perfect description of where Bill and Hillary jwirr May 2016 #27
Agree 100% with your last sentence... Yurovsky May 2016 #53
Through the years that seems like the story with many nolabels May 2016 #68
We turned over everything! Except the stuff that I decided not to turn over! XemaSab May 2016 #3
and she acts as though she did it and they were made public at her request Press Virginia May 2016 #6
Hillary and truth = oil and water. Fantastic Anarchist May 2016 #39
Translation: Yes, I wiped the server n/t davidlynch May 2016 #16
That's about the size of it. SusanCalvin May 2016 #48
Tick Tock BSers trumad May 2016 #7
her evolving explanations have nothing to do with anyone but her Press Virginia May 2016 #11
Yes, we see all of you watching the clock with various levels of apprehension Hydra May 2016 #17
They will blame Comey and spew the "innocent until proven guilty" Press Virginia May 2016 #22
As far as I know, Biden is infinitely a better choice. Fantastic Anarchist May 2016 #40
Ah, but the Brock team belongs to Hillary Hydra May 2016 #42
Biden kind of half-heartedly already ran. libdem4life May 2016 #50
I'd sure as hell vote for Biden Aerows May 2016 #70
I think I'll be staying home. I just can't vote for Hillary. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2016 #100
I am proud to be a BSer. Your attempts to ridicule are childish, but then that's your rhett o rick May 2016 #31
Tick tock trumad May 2016 #33
your hopes must be pinned to this story going away by June 7th Press Virginia May 2016 #34
Again, childish rhett o rick May 2016 #37
Yes, time is running out on Your Highness. Fantastic Anarchist May 2016 #41
drip drip jonmac511 May 2016 #56
Tick tock trumad May 2016 #69
+1,000,001 dchill May 2016 #80
Being saved from having a HORRIBLE CANDIDATE represent us is possible: Herman4747 May 2016 #49
Part of the rules is if you don't know you need to ask and she onecaliberal May 2016 #8
Yep. Ignorance of the law is not a defense. Fantastic Anarchist May 2016 #43
I remember when the criteria for Republican candidates almost reached "not yet indicted" back in the Blue Meany May 2016 #9
"I did not have relations with that server!" - Hillary Rodham Pinnochio Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #12
pretty much Press Virginia May 2016 #14
"Sorry, officer. I didn't know that I couldn't do that." Fantastic Anarchist May 2016 #44
Strategic ignorance aka If I don't ask, I don't know, therefore I'm not guilty DebDoo May 2016 #15
she would have been better off saying she didn't know the rules Press Virginia May 2016 #21
Given that there was no stated prohibition... LAS14 May 2016 #61
it's called "plausible deniability" nt grasswire May 2016 #28
What did you expect? Downwinder May 2016 #18
It was a gamble RobertEarl May 2016 #19
As "TPP sets the gold standard" became " "I hoped it would be the gold standard." (n/t) thesquanderer May 2016 #20
Perfectly reasonable. As circumstances change, one must change with them. LAS14 May 2016 #62
I don't even see how she can say that. SHE sent out an email to all the employees pdsimdars May 2016 #23
The truth is she didn't care about the rules but she's never going to Press Virginia May 2016 #26
There may be more than one pathological liar running for president. Cheese Sandwich May 2016 #25
psst... cui bono May 2016 #46
Pretty upsetting that she refused to be interviewed by the IG Dems to Win May 2016 #29
I believe it was probably on advice from council Press Virginia May 2016 #30
first excuse of a caught sociopath undergroundpanther May 2016 #32
So she was too dumb to know it wouldn't be allowed and too lazy to check? winter is coming May 2016 #35
Either she is corrupt or incompetent. Neither is acceptable. liberal_at_heart May 2016 #36
Too bad she can't have one of her lackeys change the rules on a whim without a proper vote. cui bono May 2016 #45
The fact that people are actually defending her still amazes me Press Virginia May 2016 #47
I'm with you on this. flor-de-jasmim May 2016 #51
Because... Snowden, or some such bullshit. SMC22307 May 2016 #71
Sneakiness Faux pas May 2016 #52
Her motto for workers' training: "don't ask for permission, Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #54
when has she ever asked for forgiveness ... refresh my memory. serious here. thanks. Hiraeth May 2016 #57
What she means is, Waiting For Everyman May 2016 #60
Maybe that's why she doesn't want to release the speeches? DookDook May 2016 #91
It is really very, very simple… being Secretary of State of the United States of America Agony May 2016 #55
As often as it is in the political world, it's not the scandal... basselope May 2016 #58
OK. So when what is being said changes, your response changes. LAS14 May 2016 #59
only liars have to change their story. She claimed the SD confirmed her use Press Virginia May 2016 #64
Source? LAS14 May 2016 #65
For what? HRC's change of her story? Press Virginia May 2016 #66
For Hillary "claiming SD confirmed." LAS14 May 2016 #67
More than one time Press Virginia May 2016 #74
Thanks for the citation. LAS14 May 2016 #75
The state of the SD system is irrelevant Press Virginia May 2016 #76
It's very relevant to what she might... LAS14 May 2016 #82
She never asked. Press Virginia May 2016 #85
Check this out. LAS14 May 2016 #83
Newsweek materially misstates much of the IG report Press Virginia May 2016 #86
Can you cite some mis-statements? LAS14 May 2016 #89
And when a few people raised concern about her server they were told to never mention it again pdsimdars May 2016 #63
K & R AzDar May 2016 #72
Just slow walking. HassleCat May 2016 #77
"It was allowed." dchill May 2016 #81
She also "thought" wiping her server would permanently erase the email trail. NorthCarolina May 2016 #92
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»So we've now gone from &q...»Reply #69