2016 Postmortem

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)

24. Because she is the Democratic nominee. Axelrod is a Democrat. nt

Reply to hopemountain (Reply #21)

Sun Jun 5, 2016, 07:53 PM

Jun 2016

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

53 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

David Axelrod: a very awkward position to be if you`re trying to lead a political revolution [View all] question everything Jun 2016 OP

All Bernie has now is an argument that we need to steal an election to save democracy. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #1

I can almost hear him, "In order to save Democracy, we had to burn it to the ground." Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #4

That was already done about 30 years ago Armstead Jun 2016 #25

Like Grover Norquist, who wants to deprive funds (taxes) from the government question everything Jun 2016 #32

Norquist waned to drown government in a bathtub. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #34

Bernie can talk the talk, we'll know this week whether he's willing to walk the walk, i.e. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #2

A revolution against the party elite that asks the party elite to overthrow the will of the voters.. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #3

The "will of the voters" as indicated by a corrupt election system. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #7

The will of the majority of the voters as defined by votes cast by voters. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #8

It is well know around the world that our election system is the worst of all modern rhett o rick Jun 2016 #10

Yet, somehow, the will of the voters is still heard. The elites should not coronate Sanders. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #12

What an ironic thing to say, "The elites should not coronate Sanders." rhett o rick Jun 2016 #14

His call to super-delegates to anoint him is his call to the elite. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #15

He is calling for the Super-Delegates to make this corrupted election right. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #17

He calls it a corrupted election because he has lost. Agnosticsherbet Jun 2016 #18

I prefer to fight Republicans but that is just me. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #13

Bernie is "entitled"? Pure projection. The Clinton followers didn't even want a primary because rhett o rick Jun 2016 #16

she won Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #50

No, it isn't. You're just totally wrong about that. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #23

Sorry but I am not drinking whatever you are. There were a lot of manipulations that occurred in rhett o rick Jun 2016 #27

You've just moved the goalposts. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #48

You've got a lot to say about the world's belief but what do you believe? rhett o rick Jun 2016 #52

I would say that America's elections are within the top 30% worldwide by most measures. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #53

That's not even remotely true Recursion Jun 2016 #49

You argument seems to be, .... Steal the votes that were stolen from us. seabeyond Jun 2016 #22

Corrupt enough to skew the vote by 3 million votes? Feathery Scout Jun 2016 #26

3 million votes is a lie. You leave out the states that used the caucus system. But you know that. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #29

Yep GulfCoast66 Jun 2016 #40

If this is a "corrupt" election system then why are you fighting to be a part of it? question everything Jun 2016 #33

Tea party was not a 3rd party TimPlo Jun 2016 #35

No, they are not. But they certainly influenced Congress and these elections question everything Jun 2016 #36

K & R BootinUp Jun 2016 #5

Another mouthpiece for Clinton has spouted a campaign talking point. And it totally false. A lie. imagine2015 Jun 2016 #6

once you know someone will lie to you reddread Jun 2016 #11

It's not a campaign talking point. It's a fact. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #19

LOL, Long time Obama advisor, David Axelrod is no Hillary shill MadBadger Jun 2016 #20

Yes he is. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #30

Sanders and his supporters are angry the people have stolen his nomination. stevenleser Jun 2016 #9

After referring to them as the establishment and oligarchy. You just can't make this chit up. grossproffit Jun 2016 #28

why is david axelrod shilling for hillary? hopemountain Jun 2016 #21

Because she is the Democratic nominee. Axelrod is a Democrat. nt stevenleser Jun 2016 #24

Lies, lies and more lies. She is not the nominee and he is a pathetic Democrat. But then rhett o rick Jun 2016 #31

Don't expect other people to share in your silly denial. She is the nominee. stevenleser Jun 2016 #39

LOL. You aren't worth my time and I am not sure why I failed to put you on ignore. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #42

Common sense and math are biased in favor of Hillary. geek tragedy Jun 2016 #37

thank you, geek tragedy. nt hopemountain Jun 2016 #41

We will fight on against those that have brought us 2.5 million homeless American children and rhett o rick Jun 2016 #43

Face it, your guy lost. Beacool Jun 2016 #45

Gloat if you will but your candidate supports those that brought us the poverty rhett o rick Jun 2016 #46

Voters are the establishment! Under the bus with you! tandem5 Jun 2016 #38

It's more like a revolution against democracy. Beacool Jun 2016 #44

It's a revolution for democracy. We now have a corporate run oligarchy. But you embrace rhett o rick Jun 2016 #47

It's a fairly untenable position, for sure, in a situation rife with untenable positions. Jester Messiah Jun 2016 #51