Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: California Called for Clinton While 800,000-3,000,000 Ballots Remain Uncounted [View all]BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)37. Googe the results of the CA Dem Presidential Primary
And AP shows 100% of votes reported.
Could we get the UN to start monitoring Democratic primary elections?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
California Called for Clinton While 800,000-3,000,000 Ballots Remain Uncounted [View all]
Time for change
Jun 2016
OP
All media outlets were using the word "clinch" well before the bogus announcement.
senz
Jun 2016
#43
Do you have any sympathy for people who write headlines that contradict the body of the article?
Time for change
Jun 2016
#115
Yes and things could happen between election day and the first Monday after the second Wednesday i
onenote
Jun 2016
#64
But more likely they're justing counting on the provisional ballots not being counted
Time for change
Jun 2016
#4
Or more likely, the way the spread played out, Clinton would get just as many votes as Bernie
justiceischeap
Jun 2016
#7
Yes, I've read the CA voter election laws and bylaws when this story "broke"
justiceischeap
Jun 2016
#16
Because I'm a democrat that is fine with Indies having to jump through some hoops
justiceischeap
Jun 2016
#32
Extraordinary measures? Like "hey, it might be a good idea to read the info packet we sent you"?
TwilightZone
Jun 2016
#33
No "extraordinary measures" involved in proceeding according to long-established election laws.
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#48
They are only counted if those responsible for the election decide to count them.
Time for change
Jun 2016
#46
Just wanted to clarify something. Provisional ballots are not always counted.
politicaljunkie41910
Jun 2016
#60
True, what I meant is that contrary to some conspiracy theories they're never just thrown out.
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#61
In New York, the Board of Elections which was responsible for all the voter purging and changing
Time for change
Jun 2016
#74
The sandard for which provisional ballots to count in New York was very simple.
Lord Magus
Jun 2016
#93
So how many years do you think it will take for individual voters to challenge all those provisional
Time for change
Jun 2016
#114
counties have until july 8 to send in certified results. the state does not certify til AFTER that
msongs
Jun 2016
#9
When the certification takes place has little or nothing to do with whether the provisional ballots
Time for change
Jun 2016
#113
Wait. It turns out that turnout wasn't suppressed and the votes are being counted
onenote
Jun 2016
#81
please post your list of all the paid off people, along with proof of course ;-) nt
msongs
Jun 2016
#19
If there are substantial doubts about the outcome of an election it shouldn't be called
Time for change
Jun 2016
#23
Comity is not lack of caring. Do not ever try to sow division among Bernie supporters.
senz
Jun 2016
#41
Show me where I'm wrong. How has Bernie expressed concern with the CA outcome?
brooklynite
Jun 2016
#45
I've seen enough of your posts that I wouldn't take your word for anything
Time for change
Jun 2016
#87
The link to the 5.286 million unprocessed ballots you refer to appears not to be working
Time for change
Jun 2016
#98
Some counties report a precinct as having "reported" the moment it reports its first vote
onenote
Jun 2016
#108
The point is that CA poll workers were given instructions to make ALL NPP voters vote by provisional
Time for change
Jun 2016
#112