Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
Fri Jun 10, 2016, 06:13 PM Jun 2016

Chris Hedges: The announcement by AP of Clinton as the nominee is "part of a pattern..." [View all]

to ridicule and marginalize the Sanders campaign, by corporate media. There is an inbuilt hostility toward Sanders because he is not the approved corporate candidate.
Much more in the interview below.

109 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Corporate Elite WILL protect themselves and Their Investment Ferd Berfel Jun 2016 #1
Always. All ways. 840high Jun 2016 #26
The corporate media have been AGAINST Clinton Hortensis Jun 2016 #90
Because the media spent so much more time airing Bernie Dustlawyer Jun 2016 #101
Because trees are really purple and pink? Bye. Hortensis Jun 2016 #104
Facts are pesky things, think your rose colored glasses need cleaning. Dustlawyer Jun 2016 #105
^^^^^^ THIS^^^^^^ Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #106
Lol. Not an admirer of the token pseudoliberal here either. Hortensis Jun 2016 #109
Sure, it's part of a pattern. The pattern is that some people can count and some people can't. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #2
sanders would not only have beaten trump by more than hillary will, but would have much better Doctor_J Jun 2016 #15
Proof? Dem2 Jun 2016 #67
You say you want proof then say "don't show me polls!"? lmao pinebox Jun 2016 #73
Because the polls are not proof. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #80
nope Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #108
The problem is that some people feel more comfy siding with the Rich and then gloat when the Rich rhett o rick Jun 2016 #27
That have a lot to do with being able to count to 2383? TwilightZone Jun 2016 #59
You are saying nonsense to the 2,500,000 homeless American children when you side with the rhett o rick Jun 2016 #62
Just when I thought you couldn't say anything less relevant to the topic at hand... TwilightZone Jun 2016 #65
It seems Clinton still never hit 2383 pleged delegates.#CLINTONMATH Matt_R Jun 2016 #99
That was 400 delegates ago. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #102
wow so #clintonmath has her at 2783 pledged delegates? Matt_R Jun 2016 #103
There is an "inbuilt hostility" toward progressive ideals in general. arcane1 Jun 2016 #3
+1 thank you Matt_R Jun 2016 #100
Part of the pattern of reporting results, what, a dozen times since the Primary started? randome Jun 2016 #4
OMG they called it for Obama the same way workinclasszero Jun 2016 #5
I really noticed the "Fix" was in just prior to Jack Bone Jun 2016 #6
They made Sanders unprepared for the NyDN interview?!?!? Nope bettyellen Jun 2016 #13
No. They placed his answers out of context. NWCorona Jun 2016 #25
Read the whole interview. Not impressive. bettyellen Jun 2016 #30
I have read it. From start to finish and we will just have to disagree. NWCorona Jun 2016 #35
So what was out of context? They printed the whole damn thing. sweetloukillbot Jun 2016 #66
Lol NWCorona Jun 2016 #68
Worked on you too...LOL Jack Bone Jun 2016 #69
Yes, it is "part of a pattern", stretching back to 1789 Tarc Jun 2016 #7
Actually only since 1981 RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #28
boo hoo CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #8
I love how you totally ignore issues and engage in stupid adhominums Armstead Jun 2016 #19
That's the problem today RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #24
Yes, like believing math. NT Adrahil Jun 2016 #32
Math is not an issue. RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #34
Yes Hillary got more delegates TheFarseer Jun 2016 #77
I gave them all the attention they warrant with regard to the AP ct. CorkySt.Clair Jun 2016 #64
They want to want to censor us online and in the polls felix_numinous Jun 2016 #9
Don't Forget About Eric Schmidt (GOOGLE) And What Is ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #88
Thanks felix_numinous Jun 2016 #92
the "progressive" movement is fueled by a persecution complex wyldwolf Jun 2016 #10
Thank you Rush....or is it Sean? Armstead Jun 2016 #18
Marx? Or is it Castro? wyldwolf Jun 2016 #20
Just an old-fashioned liberal who now is considered a radical by the Democratic Party Armstead Jun 2016 #22
So you feel persecuted wyldwolf Jun 2016 #42
Naw, more like pissed the Democratic Party has moved away from me and millions of other Armstead Jun 2016 #61
They're Hoping We'll DIE Or At Least Go Away You Know... ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #95
What a terrible thing to say. The progressive movement is fighting for the 2.5 million homeless rhett o rick Jun 2016 #36
And you're fueled by a persecution complex wyldwolf Jun 2016 #40
Wow. I think that kind of sums up who you really are. rhett o rick Jun 2016 #44
That's all you can say? wyldwolf Jun 2016 #51
Isn't THAT ENOUGH??? n/t ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #89
If cop outs are your thing, then yes. wyldwolf Jun 2016 #96
Ugh ... more "Russia Today" crap. :-P "Putin-Controlled Media You Can Trust" NurseJackie Jun 2016 #11
Chris Hedges is TOPS in every way. Octafish Jun 2016 #16
LOL! I've never heard any Russian propaganda or US. Duval Jun 2016 #38
There's a reason that they are on Putin's TV network NurseJackie Jun 2016 #53
I find far more propaganda on: bvar22 Jun 2016 #50
When I want Putin's perspective on things… NurseJackie Jun 2016 #52
When I want the Wall Street 1% Corporate view, bvar22 Jun 2016 #55
Just because you don't recognize it as propaganda doesn't mean it isn't. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #81
I will say the same about: bvar22 Jun 2016 #85
Not Sure If You've EVER Watched RT... BUT I've Been Watching For ChiciB1 Jun 2016 #91
They should have announced it long before they did. Lil Missy Jun 2016 #12
How ironic. bvar22 Jun 2016 #87
AP response from their blog George Eliot Jun 2016 #14
I think the snark was perfectly justified. Adrahil Jun 2016 #93
Well, even if they want to change mind, they can't now can they? George Eliot Jun 2016 #98
Chris Hedges is often too depressing.....But unfortunately he often is telling the truth Armstead Jun 2016 #17
Thats the problem. bvar22 Jun 2016 #54
A pattern of using math and statistics to report the news. Ace Rothstein Jun 2016 #21
There's an old adage from Statistics 101. RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #29
There's a calculation from Math 101. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #60
Something tells me that only the world's BIGGEST violin is going to get this job done.... BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #23
Something tells me you won't 840high Jun 2016 #31
Hubris and arrogance will be their downfall. It's just like the schoolyard. Some hide behind rhett o rick Jun 2016 #43
I could care less jamese777 Jun 2016 #45
You mistakenly assume that I want you, or people like you, in my corner. Sorry, I've got standards. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #46
We have standards too. It's called not selling out. pinebox Jun 2016 #74
A.k.a. Not winning. Enjoy the purity-flavored losses. BobbyDrake Jun 2016 #75
Enjoy your corporate corrupted candidate pinebox Jun 2016 #76
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #33
I see. Can't attack the issue, attack the person RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #39
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #41
Do you have proof of these "conspiracies theories" that you mention RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #48
If the primaries had been close jamese777 Jun 2016 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #49
Who cares what that kook thinks? Gomez163 Jun 2016 #56
That's right, can't speak to the points, attack the person RoccoR5955 Jun 2016 #57
He also didn't like Obama. When is the world gonna end? It's only been 8 years. Gomez163 Jun 2016 #58
Meh. Don't care. My voting decisions aren't based on AP announcements. cheapdate Jun 2016 #63
K & R AzDar Jun 2016 #70
The right-wing of the Democratic Party hates this guy, probably because he keeps ... Scuba Jun 2016 #71
Math is not moral or immoral, it just is. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #82
That doesn't explain why the right wing of the Democratic Party hates Chris Hedges. Scuba Jun 2016 #83
A few weeks ago, when the AP was putting out pro-Bernie articles ... JoePhilly Jun 2016 #72
Kick! tex-wyo-dem Jun 2016 #78
The media is rigged! newfie11 Jun 2016 #79
So what was "unreal" about this information? The fact that you didn't like it? NT Adrahil Jun 2016 #94
The AP announcement wasn't about marginalizing Bernie, it was about reporting the facts. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #84
Plagiarhater needs to go back under his rock. He has no credibility. Link: ucrdem Jun 2016 #86
This may backfire on the dem party big time. zalinda Jun 2016 #97
I listened to about 30 seconds of Hedges and had to turn him off Florencenj2point0 Jun 2016 #107
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Chris Hedges: The announc...»Reply #0