Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

think

(11,641 posts)
29. USTR's Michael Froman was paid millions in bonuses from Citigroup to join Obama admin
Sat Jun 25, 2016, 04:28 PM
Jun 2016
Obama Admin’s TPP Trade Officials Received Hefty Bonuses From Big Banks

February 20, 2014
by Lee Fang


Officials tapped by the Obama administration to lead the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade negotiations have received multimillion dollar bonuses from CitiGroup and Bank of America, financial disclosures obtained by Republic Report show.

Stefan Selig, a Bank of America investment banker nominated to become the undersecretary for international trade at the Department of Commerce, received more than $9 million in bonus pay as he was nominated to join the administration in November. The bonus pay came in addition to the $5.1 million in incentive pay awarded to Selig last year.

Michael Froman, the current US Trade Representative, received over $4 million as part of multiple exit payments when he left CitiGroup to join the Obama administration. Froman told Senate Finance Committee members last summer that he donated approximately 75 percent of the $2.25 million bonus he received for his work in 2008 to charity. CitiGroup also gave Froman a $2 million payment in connection to his holdings in two investment funds, which was awarded “in recognition of [Froman’s] service to Citi in various capacities since 1999.”


Read more:
http://billmoyers.com/2014/02/20/obama-admins-tpp-trade-officials-received-hefty-bonuses-from-big-banks/





Wall Street Pays Bankers to Work in Government and It Doesn't Want Anyone to Know

BY DAVID DAYEN - February 4, 2015

Citigroup is one of three Wall Street banks attempting to keep hidden their practice of paying executives multimillion-dollar awards for entering government service. In letters delivered to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over the last month, Citi, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley seek exemption from a shareholder proposal, filed by the AFL-CIO labor coalition, which would force them to identify all executives eligible for these financial rewards, and the specific dollar amounts at stake. Critics argue these “golden parachutes” ensure more financial insiders in policy positions and favorable treatment toward Wall Street.

“As shareholders of these banks, we want to know how much money we have promised to give away to senior executives if they take government jobs,” said AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka in a statement. “It’s a simple question, but the banks don’t want to answer it. What are they trying to hide?”

Read more:
https://newrepublic.com/article/120967/wall-street-pays-bankers-work-government-and-wants-it-secret


http://www.commondreams.org/news/2016/05/27/emails-show-tpp-collusion-between-big-banks-obama-administration
Progressives need to distance ourselves, as far as possible, from the TPP. It's a horrible deal. nt w4rma Jun 2016 #1
"A closed mind... yallerdawg Jun 2016 #2
The TPP is more globalization without any control. After Brexit, I'd think twice of any corporate swhisper1 Jun 2016 #3
You might want to listen to your own advice.... think Jun 2016 #4
I'm not going along with the vast majority of DU'ers... yallerdawg Jun 2016 #9
The TPP was written by corporations for the corporations. The AFL-CIO was shut out & ignored think Jun 2016 #10
Labor Advisory Committee yallerdawg Jun 2016 #15
Facts are such pesty little things. okasha Jun 2016 #16
Labor's So-Called "Seat at the Table" at TPP Negotiations think Jun 2016 #18
Astoundingly... yallerdawg Jun 2016 #24
USTR's Michael Froman was paid millions in bonuses from Citigroup to join Obama admin think Jun 2016 #29
US Labor has been the only one trying to enforce the labor relations in these trade agreements think Jun 2016 #33
Exactly! Thank you! fun n serious Jun 2016 #41
Keep peddling this shit. TDale313 Jun 2016 #30
TPP is a renegotiation of NAFTA. JaneyVee Jun 2016 #8
Malaysia was part of NAFTA? Who knew! think Jun 2016 #11
Canada and Mexico were part of NAFTA. yallerdawg Jun 2016 #21
The caveat ymetca Jun 2016 #5
The World Trade Organization JaneyVee Jun 2016 #7
Is a paper tiger. Exilednight Jun 2016 #23
I agree. JaneyVee Jun 2016 #6
Not shocked ibegurpard Jun 2016 #32
And what of taxpayers being on the hook katsy Jun 2016 #12
+1 CentralMass Jun 2016 #28
Why does BigPharma need longer exclusivity rights for their drugs? RAFisher Jun 2016 #13
TPP and ISDS process Arizona Roadrunner Jun 2016 #14
On the other hand... yallerdawg Jun 2016 #17
Sorry, but no. JaneyVee Jun 2016 #19
Tend to agree and I think trade agreements are a key to our and world's future. Hoyt Jun 2016 #20
Greater interdepencies on trade serve to end the potential for armed conflict. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #26
Trade agreements are definitely more than just trade. Plus they help poorer countries grow. Hoyt Jun 2016 #39
"My mind is made up-- don't confuse me with facts" is not just the mantra of the right wing... TreasonousBastard Jun 2016 #22
K&R FOR TRUTH! eom MohRokTah Jun 2016 #25
Those who wrote the TPP provisions had two goals. guillaumeb Jun 2016 #27
Investor State Trade Disputes ibegurpard Jun 2016 #31
Doctors Without Borders: TPP is the worst trade agreement for access to medicines Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #34
Or... yallerdawg Jun 2016 #35
There will be no tariffs on imported drugs Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #36
The TPP is a DISASTER waiting to happen. I refuse to support anyone who is for it. ThePhilosopher04 Jun 2016 #37
A disaster? Compared to what? nt Jitter65 Jun 2016 #38
How come there was never any discussion of support for TPP during the primary? NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #40
I voiced my support early on fun n serious Jun 2016 #42
Supporting the TPP... JSup Jun 2016 #43
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why progressives should r...»Reply #29