Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MFM008

(19,776 posts)
56. yes this is NBC and WSJ
Tue Jun 28, 2016, 03:19 AM
Jun 2016

Rupert Murdoch Wall Street Journal..............
which means I trust it LESS than others, oh except Fox, Rasmussen,
YouGov, Gallup, Gravis whom have a republican trend of up to 7 points.

Looks like chickens have been counted before they were hatched. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #1
There seems to be little more HRC can do to "win over" Sanders' voters outside of giving him the Jitter65 Jun 2016 #2
Sorry, but extolling the virtues of the establishment won't help here. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #3
"establishment"--like John Lewis. Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #5
What is not reality Uponthegears Jun 2016 #86
Apparently your definition of establishment is a new one. Evergreen Emerald Jun 2016 #95
Allow me to disagree Uponthegears Jun 2016 #96
It's not about you. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #7
Establishment - like Barney Frank and Planned Parenthood? (nt) ehrnst Jun 2016 #80
I wouldn't presume to tell whether Jitter65 considers Barney Frank "establishment", Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #88
I read your list of "Must dos" for Clinton to gain your support and I'm sure that everyone else who politicaljunkie41910 Jun 2016 #98
The question is whether those supprters want the party to keep itself together. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #104
Uh, the establishment brought us what? PatrickforO Jun 2016 #51
And I want a Lamborghini Aventador 730 n/t cosmicone Jun 2016 #66
Thanks for the comment.... Human101948 Jun 2016 #101
Single payer won't work - at least done in less than 10 years. ehrnst Jun 2016 #81
Churchill, I believe, said that we American could always be counted on PatrickforO Jun 2016 #105
For many, many reasons, it's not feasible in the US at this time ehrnst Jun 2016 #112
The Defense Budget isn't "war spending". George II Jun 2016 #100
Much of it is. And much of the tremendous expenditures are wasted. PatrickforO Jun 2016 #107
She's getting no encouragement from them looks like she can't win them over - she will have to kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #53
Moving to the center is exactly what she shouldn't do. PatrickforO Jun 2016 #108
Maybe our party needs more TPP. Let's try that! n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #72
Please tell me that wasn't a serious suggestion? Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #89
I happen to agree that it's a shitty idea. It is the plan, however. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jun 2016 #93
The Green Party is on the ballot on 33 states; the Libertarians, 21. pnwmom Jun 2016 #22
You are right, hopefully. I have been a fervent Bernie supporter, PatrickforO Jun 2016 #109
Some don't realize the disaster if we got less than 270 electoral votes. pnwmom Jun 2016 #113
Yeah, you know I saw an article where an internal RNC memo PatrickforO Jun 2016 #114
I think Bernie effectively sent the message that there is a thirst among Dems pnwmom Jun 2016 #115
...!100++++ 840high Jun 2016 #42
Remember, it's not the people here who need to win over anyone. It's also not the people here eastwestdem Jun 2016 #49
This site is primarily entertainment for me because I love being able PatrickforO Jun 2016 #110
Take responsibility for your own choices 72DejaVu Jun 2016 #58
I support down-ticket Democrats alright. Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #59
Not supporting the democratic nominee for POTUS violates TOS cosmicone Jun 2016 #67
Explicitly saying so violates the TOS. But I said: I support down-ticket Democrats Betty Karlson Jun 2016 #71
We keep hearing that she needs to win over the Sanders supporters liberal N proud Jun 2016 #79
Well, first, which is it? 51 to 39 or 46 to 41? Hortensis Jun 2016 #4
The poll looks like an outlier. I wouldn't worry about it. TwilightZone Jun 2016 #6
Again with the Mrs. Clinton mercuryblues Jun 2016 #8
What is the correct protocol? Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #10
Either SoS or Senator would be fine. "Honorable" also works. mikehiggins Jun 2016 #12
Well said Rose Siding Jun 2016 #14
See my #17 Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #18
have you ever mercuryblues Jun 2016 #15
Internet suggests that Senator is correct, but Secretary is not. Donald Ian Rankin Jun 2016 #17
When the media mercuryblues Jun 2016 #21
That is the New York Times format democrattotheend Jun 2016 #20
Don't they use the title the first time and then revert to bettyellen Jun 2016 #24
Only for the president, it seems democrattotheend Jun 2016 #26
I knew they always call him Pres Onama at first! bettyellen Jun 2016 #44
Sickening. I'm glad to finally know the reality of how women are really thought of. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #54
I think New York Times is complying with a gender-neutral style guide. David__77 Jun 2016 #57
Prediction: your facts will be ignored. n/t arcane1 Jun 2016 #70
As well as the AP Stylebook. LanternWaste Jun 2016 #90
I would be curious about how they know her preference. spooky3 Jun 2016 #91
Here's some more information. David__77 Jun 2016 #92
Thanks, but your link didn't come through. spooky3 Jun 2016 #97
Sorry, I fixed it above. David__77 Jun 2016 #103
Thanks. spooky3 Jun 2016 #106
NBC not Wapo Johnny2X2X Jun 2016 #9
Correct. writes3000 Jun 2016 #11
yes this is NBC and WSJ MFM008 Jun 2016 #56
Jill Stein's vote share is an inconsequential target... brooklynite Jun 2016 #13
But Rose Siding Jun 2016 #16
By your logic she should get a libertarian VP. Stein gets 6, Johnson gets 10. YouDig Jun 2016 #19
They're on the ballot in only 33 states (Greens) and 21 states (Libertarians). pnwmom Jun 2016 #23
meh JoePhilly Jun 2016 #25
Hillary has never polled well with unaffiliated, new or independent voters. fasttense Jun 2016 #27
Some people hold on to principles and see that the best can be made from it. peace13 Jun 2016 #32
Like this. 840high Jun 2016 #43
A GREEN candidate? Kermit the Frog? DemFromPittsburgh Jun 2016 #28
I think we are better than this. peace13 Jun 2016 #29
Speak for yourself DemFromPittsburgh Jun 2016 #35
One would hope to think so, but NorthCarolina Jun 2016 #116
"3rd" parties always poll better now than they actually perform in November. NT Adrahil Jun 2016 #30
Clinton IS a strong progressive MaggieD Jun 2016 #31
You do know she calls herself a moderate from time to time don't you? peace13 Jun 2016 #34
Moderate compared to a socialist MaggieD Jun 2016 #36
She's awesome at being everything! peace13 Jun 2016 #37
She is awesome at being a progressive Democrat MaggieD Jun 2016 #38
Not sure what you are trying to accomplish here. peace13 Jun 2016 #39
I'm supporting our party's nominee for president MaggieD Jun 2016 #40
Support is only meaningful if based on her actual record, and her progressive cred is too limited JudyM Jun 2016 #55
I disagree MaggieD Jun 2016 #60
Would you please point to specific achievements? I would like to be able to see "effectiveness" as JudyM Jun 2016 #64
Ushering through SCHIP as First Lady MaggieD Jun 2016 #65
We are hardly looking for purity, that's a false canard. JudyM Jun 2016 #69
Okay, but my perception is different than yours MaggieD Jun 2016 #73
Truth, a lot of people can't handle it uponit7771 Jun 2016 #47
This is Democratic Underground. We support he Democratic nominee. leftofcool Jun 2016 #52
That would be nice! MaggieD Jun 2016 #74
ain't that the truth. Hiraeth Jun 2016 #50
She is not a strong progressive Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #75
The facts simply don't support your assertion MaggieD Jun 2016 #77
Supporting Clinton and thinking she is a "strong progressive" Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #84
If the progressives of the Dem party endorse one candidate, and not the other ehrnst Jun 2016 #78
Exactly MaggieD Jun 2016 #82
I thought this was about whether Clinton was a progressive Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #83
Pissing match? I simply applied your logic about her ehrnst Jun 2016 #85
Then we are back to the other argument on this subthread Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #99
Lol,your defination is not mine. Nt Logical Jun 2016 #87
No worries - your definition of a Democrat is not mine either MaggieD Jun 2016 #94
16%? How can you add WhiteTara Jun 2016 #33
The former secretary of state is already wise. lapucelle Jun 2016 #41
Suggesting she would be "wise to get a strong progressive/green candidate on her ticket" SheilaT Jun 2016 #45
Sorry you misunderstood my suggestion. rgbecker Jun 2016 #46
Then I wish you'd have expressed it that way. SheilaT Jun 2016 #61
IMO did you make a freudian slip DLCWIdem Jun 2016 #63
81% of Sanders' supporters have already switched to Hillary. cosmicone Jun 2016 #68
Most of Julian Castro's political beliefs Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #62
The poll looks like an outlier RAFisher Jun 2016 #48
81% of Sanders supporters say they will vote for Hillary still_one Jun 2016 #76
It's really quite irrelevant, because Stein & Johnson will end up with less than 1% in November. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #102
Not to reopen an old wound but tell that to Al Gore. bklyncowgirl Jun 2016 #111
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The rest of the story abo...»Reply #56