Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Response to Adrahil (Reply #27)

Still talking down to her .... n/t cosmicone Jun 2016 #1
A very nasty, bitter interview. NYC Liberal Jun 2016 #5
Andrea asked if he shares the praise that Eliz Warren gave her yesterday-Sanders ignored riversedge Jun 2016 #59
Bernie prolly has hard feelins ova the way Hillary treated him, but he must get past that & make certain that asswipe tRump gets nowhere near the White House. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #83
I thought she treated him with kid gloves woolldog Jun 2016 #129
It really doesn't matter at this point... what matters is that fuckwad tRump gets his racist ass handed to him come November. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #137
She did everything but put a mint on his pillow and leave milk & cookies Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #157
Yes, yes she did. And he should. Hekate Jun 2016 #224
Ha! good on Andrea for showing the clip of Elizabeth and Hillary from yesterday! Cha Jun 2016 #144
Here's the Video Night Watchman Jun 2016 #239
As many of Hillary's supporters have noted, the Washington Post can't be trusted... Human101948 Jun 2016 #2
Do you have any evidence the Sanders was misquoted in this piece? EffieBlack Jun 2016 #6
I saw the interview live. The WaPo piece is factually correct. Adrahil Jun 2016 #24
I agree with you, but you're right, people should watch it themselves LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #46
Always said The Washington Post is a RW trash publication. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #85
bernie is no longer relevant by his own hand. MariaThinks Jun 2016 #3
That made me think of something entirely different cosmicone Jun 2016 #17
stop it MariaThinks Jun 2016 #33
I disagree; he's still pulling for us (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #48
I think the accusation is that he's tooting his own horn. nt msanthrope Jun 2016 #67
Warren is. Bernie is not MariaThinks Jun 2016 #74
It was a pun, bsed on cosmicone's reponse to your post LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #76
that was funny. Sorry i missed it MariaThinks Jun 2016 #82
You're kiddin right? InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #86
I haven't gotten a donation request email from him since the end of May. Svafa Jun 2016 #207
How is "pulling a Nader" pulling for us? kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #91
he is pulling a nader and feels entitled MariaThinks Jun 2016 #223
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #227
This part right here: bravenak Jun 2016 #4
+1 (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #7
+1 MaggieD Jun 2016 #120
Yeah he gives himself a ton of credit doesn't he? It's interesting that he doesn't realize she bettyellen Jun 2016 #128
He also doesn't realize that he can claim moral superiority all he wants, but his actions eastwestdem Jun 2016 #210
Yeah it's like the claim he is better on choice- for having an opinion no one shares.... bettyellen Jun 2016 #218
You quote the characterization of Sanders' words Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #149
what "great" words about Hillary did he say in this interview? Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #158
None because Bernie Sanders isn't a Clinton surrogate. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #159
He told the damn truth Armstead Jun 2016 #173
It is not great. You missed it. It shows his weakness. AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #191
I agree. brer cat Jun 2016 #165
+1 from me, too pandr32 Jun 2016 #202
At this point, the only choice is to lock him out of the convention. MohRokTah Jun 2016 #8
That should work out well for party unity. Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #22
At what point does his refusal to accept the party nominee... Adrahil Jun 2016 #27
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #31
Oh c'mon.... Adrahil Jun 2016 #36
Oh, no, a politician is trying to leverage clout? Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #43
He's already formally lost. The nomination is just the medal ceremony Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #160
His call, of course, but he's losing clout daily. Adrahil Jun 2016 #184
Nailed it. Svafa Jun 2016 #213
Exactly MaggieD Jun 2016 #121
No. He can not win. KMOD Jun 2016 #49
And Hillary has not yet, by the rules, won. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #60
It's inevitable. KMOD Jun 2016 #62
That's fine. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #65
Keep telling yourself that. GulfCoast66 Jun 2016 #171
I don't need to. I'm not the one obsessed with Bernie Sanders and his daily actions/interviews. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #181
Yes, and there's not enough evidence to establish Anthropogenic Climate Change. Adrahil Jun 2016 #185
I really don't understand the Bernie obsession. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #197
Technically, Bernie is still in the running, but practically speaking, he needs to get behind the presumptive nominee. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2016 #88
Who says he is not accepting her as the nominee Armstead Jun 2016 #175
This is not the way to do it. He will get no where as an outsider AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #193
Won't get anywhere as a sycophant, that 's for sure Armstead Jun 2016 #221
The remaining holdouts will never come over any way MohRokTah Jun 2016 #29
At least you are honest about the upcoming pivot to the right Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #34
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #45
It's Sanders' fault that we now have to. eom MohRokTah Jun 2016 #47
That's one of the silliest things I have read in quite some time. Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #51
Then your sense of silly is out of kilter MohRokTah Jun 2016 #58
I agree. If Hiilary cannot win over that 8%, she has to go elsewhere to moderates. It's a shame kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #101
Sanders does not seem to want LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #104
I second that. Btw - he still lists himself as an Independent on his FB page (Senator Sanders). Native Jun 2016 #124
If "unity" means blind obedience and only one opinion ever allowed.... Armstead Jun 2016 #179
I don't believe I said LoverOfLiberty Jun 2016 #205
+1 Svafa Jun 2016 #214
He's just saying things he's said before, but Washington Post loves starting drama realmirage Jun 2016 #9
He may have said these things when he was in a contest w/Clinton. But the primary's over and he lost EffieBlack Jun 2016 #11
We all know he's doing political theater to get leverage over the convention. realmirage Jun 2016 #32
Sanders' appeal is his consistency. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #151
It has gotten worse since Jeff Bezos took over still_one Jun 2016 #12
Enquirer is better. 840high Jun 2016 #37
Exactly. The WaPo churns out anti-Sanders garbage. NT Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #150
Chris Cillizza, an OP-Ed columnist, is the author of the column... DonViejo Jun 2016 #164
And Cillizza hates HRC mcar Jun 2016 #226
The same writer who invented "Mad Bitch Beer" for Hillary? arcane1 Jun 2016 #10
Yes, attack the source instead of addressing what Sanders said. EffieBlack Jun 2016 #13
Yes, and the writer attaches his own meaning to them. It's his opinion. He's attacking the source nt arcane1 Jun 2016 #16
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #23
No he raised valid issues that needed to be raised Armstead Jun 2016 #182
Truths are no longer good things, apparently n/t arcane1 Jun 2016 #201
And the story provided a link to the original interview (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #57
There's a definite sense of entitlement in his tone. He truly doesn't get that he lost. CrowCityDem Jun 2016 #14
Agreed Gothmog Jun 2016 #139
"Clinton and her campaign have been generally fine with all of this.." Buzz cook Jun 2016 #15
Bernie for me= LenaBaby61 Jun 2016 #18
How is this for condescension? rateyes Jun 2016 #19
Well since he doesn't kowtow he is whistler162 Jun 2016 #38
Yes, he is! rateyes Jun 2016 #41
The base voted for Hillary. LuvLoogie Jun 2016 #55
Uh huh. Ok. rateyes Jun 2016 #66
This message was self-deleted by its author LAS14 Jun 2016 #75
The base voted for Clinton 64/35 TwilightZone Jun 2016 #115
Total votes according to the were 15.5M to 12.8M not 2 to 1 Armstead Jun 2016 #186
That 8% is not the base. They are in the left margin. The base is minorities, the gblt, women. kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #127
I am to the point I don't care is Sanders speaks at the convention or not Hokie Jun 2016 #20
Read the Gawd Damn interview, it wasn't condescending. JRLeft Jun 2016 #42
Chris Cilizza has never been a Clinton fan. spooky3 Jun 2016 #84
That interview was incredibly condescending Gothmog Jun 2016 #140
Bingo. Sanders says the same things as in his stump speech Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #153
Which proves the articles point; the primary contest is over and "demands" by someone who has uponit7771 Jun 2016 #169
+1 MaggieD Jun 2016 #123
+1!! Cha Jun 2016 #145
I'm sure that Sanders will come around soon. Tal Vez Jun 2016 #21
That's a whole hell of a lot of poetic license by Cillizza Goblinmonger Jun 2016 #25
Reading between the lines Cillizza whistler162 Jun 2016 #40
Chris Cillizza taking offense because he's paid to Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #154
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jun 2016 #26
Bullshit. Nothing wrong with those quotes in the article. HERVEPA Jun 2016 #28
I disagree, he's placing the onus on Clinton to make sure he plays his part as if he ... uponit7771 Jun 2016 #102
Careful how you characterize that.... Armstead Jun 2016 #187
Most are not though, the "flocking" is such because of the rate relative to 08... not even close uponit7771 Jun 2016 #198
Do you think just because they will vote for Clinton over Trump, glowing Jun 2016 #189
I hope not, that's why they'll put their energy were it technically counts other than the office uponit7771 Jun 2016 #199
This is why I don't understand the pushback? glowing Jun 2016 #208
Push back is from people who just don't believe he was the guy to bring all that ... uponit7771 Jun 2016 #216
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #30
There was nothing condescending in that interview but the writer of the article JRLeft Jun 2016 #35
I didn't take the author's word for it, I watched the interview myself. I agree withthe author LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #64
To be honest, he's losing me. liberalmuse Jun 2016 #39
Seen what? The media spin? ThinkCritically Jun 2016 #50
On second look this is a bit of rat fuckery Buzz cook Jun 2016 #44
This is just WaPo stirring the shit pokerfan Jun 2016 #111
From Yesterday's Washington Post: jamese777 Jun 2016 #52
Yeap, twice the rate of Clinton to Obama in 08...Sanders movement has moved on uponit7771 Jun 2016 #100
I am not sure most, or any of you, actually read the article. ciaobaby Jun 2016 #53
The article included a link to the original interview; I watched it, and I agree with Cillizza (nt) LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #61
I agree. LAS14 Jun 2016 #79
this is condescending? Voice for Peace Jun 2016 #54
No, it's not condescending. It's straightforward and honest. LAS14 Jun 2016 #73
I still don't get the strategy mcar Jun 2016 #56
Right!? He has no real leverage and his supporters are flocking to Clinton at twice the rate... uponit7771 Jun 2016 #99
I am glad he still wants to transform the party. He is keeping his eye on the ball. Vattel Jun 2016 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author geek tragedy Jun 2016 #70
It's not "his" party to transform. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #89
That says it all. WhiteTara Jun 2016 #106
Why did you put quotation marks around "his"? Vattel Jun 2016 #108
BAM! There it is, Nance delivered it personally on a silver platter Number23 Jun 2016 #119
Perfect!! Grassy Knoll Jun 2016 #126
I have to agree CajunBlazer Jun 2016 #132
+1000 kerry-is-my-prez Jun 2016 #142
Hear, hear!!! Beacool Jun 2016 #146
Oh so a person cannot change his or her mind? AllyCat Jun 2016 #147
Not people who chide others for doing so uponit7771 Jun 2016 #168
Yup. He's evolving farleftlib Jun 2016 #211
Yeeaah Svafa Jun 2016 #212
That is what I see too. It's fine to bash AllyCat Jun 2016 #230
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #233
He is a registered Democrat AllyCat Jun 2016 #235
Only when it served ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #236
Then why is he still one? AllyCat Jun 2016 #238
THIS could not be better stated!! Nt AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #242
He's transformed me ..... against the far left .... first Nader then Sanders....they uponit7771 Jun 2016 #94
The far left can survive without your support. Vattel Jun 2016 #109
And there is part of the problem ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #136
Do you ever tire of straw men? Vattel Jun 2016 #162
Okay, let's pretend ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #234
And there it is, the dishonest reply that I have come to expect. Vattel Jun 2016 #240
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #167
Barnie Frank is right Renew Deal Jun 2016 #68
He could have played a yuuuugggeeee role MFM008 Jun 2016 #69
This is the perfect example between Loki Jun 2016 #71
Eh. I think it was OK. I took him at his word. He's keeping... LAS14 Jun 2016 #72
He'll have no tangible leverage... he can't do anything and his supporters are flocking to Clinton a uponit7771 Jun 2016 #96
First off The Fix has always been broken Wash. state Desk Jet Jun 2016 #77
Is WaPo a tabloid now? runaway hero Jun 2016 #78
NY Post would have published that anti-Sanders opinion Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #155
Color me shocked liberal N proud Jun 2016 #80
Some think there will be an indictment and that is why he lingers nest Jun 2016 #81
+1, The FBI Never claimed to be investigating her anyway uponit7771 Jun 2016 #98
If half of this is true then I'm disappointed uponit7771 Jun 2016 #87
He's still views Democrats and Hillary in an adversarial way. DCBob Jun 2016 #90
Wonder what he thinks of Elizabeth Warren, then. randome Jun 2016 #113
Yeah. I wonder that too. DCBob Jun 2016 #117
We all know what he thinks of Elizabeth Warren. AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #243
Exactly this! ^^^^^^^^^^^^ AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #195
Not for nuthin', but ... NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #92
Sounds like he's on replay, doesn't it? randome Jun 2016 #105
Exactly. NanceGreggs Jun 2016 #131
Sanders continues to place the onus on Clinton for making sure he does his part uponit7771 Jun 2016 #93
Understand.. speaktruthtopower Jun 2016 #95
He can't demand anything without some leverage...now he has little and uponit7771 Jun 2016 #97
How is this condescending? Joe the Revelator Jun 2016 #103
Because it was a straightforward question he refused to answer. randome Jun 2016 #107
Telling the reporter that she doesn't ask the right question isn't condescending? MADem Jun 2016 #190
Has he ever said anything nice about Warren? (Maybe I'm not using the right search terms.) randome Jun 2016 #194
Not that I've heard. MADem Jun 2016 #196
Who? Beausoir Jun 2016 #110
I thought Bernie sounded magnanimous F. Kafka Jun 2016 #112
He said he's voting for her, but he won't endorse her; that seems to be the extent LongtimeAZDem Jun 2016 #116
Conceding that Hillary won is within his power. So is endorsing her. Lord Magus Jun 2016 #135
Exactly and I find it sexist as hell MaggieD Jun 2016 #114
I'm a huge Clinton supporter, but I think the sexist accusations are over done CajunBlazer Jun 2016 #134
LOL! Like anyone actually cares Number23 Jun 2016 #118
I see no condescension in this interview. I see Andrea Mitchell asking the same question over and ov elias7 Jun 2016 #122
It was not a close primary. Johnny2X2X Jun 2016 #125
i voted for Sanders JI7 Jun 2016 #130
It's clear that he will not endorse KingFlorez Jun 2016 #133
I don't see what was condescending about it democrattotheend Jun 2016 #138
Put Senator Warren on the ticket and Clinton can ignore Sanders Gothmog Jun 2016 #141
Maybe this is partly why she is being vetted. The other reason being that she is just that amazing. AgadorSparticus Jun 2016 #192
Senator Warren is indeed amazing and I love the way she gets under Trump's thin skin Gothmog Jun 2016 #204
What is so condesending about Bernie's statement? He said he will continue to campaign until the akbacchus_BC Jun 2016 #143
The direct quotes of Sanders are great. Eric J in MN Jun 2016 #148
Cillizza hates HRC mcar Jun 2016 #237
Ah, I see Scootaloo Jun 2016 #152
I've got no problem with this statement of his... David__77 Jun 2016 #156
Sorry, I don't think what he said was condescending. I think it was true. highprincipleswork Jun 2016 #161
The thing they don't get about Bernie is that he cares about the people above all. Vinca Jun 2016 #163
Demanding anything after losing sounds entitled not caring at all. If he cared so much he'd be doing uponit7771 Jun 2016 #170
I guess Democrats should have just slunk off into the corner after GW Bush won Armstead Jun 2016 #178
Nope nor do I suppose GWB would've accepted Gores demands either, same here... the losing position uponit7771 Jun 2016 #200
I don't understand how anyone can be upset when someone is such a passionate advocate for the 99%. Vinca Jun 2016 #203
SuperDelegates haven't voted yet revolutionfoundation Jun 2016 #166
Chris Cilizza -- the master of condescension -- complaining about condescension? Armstead Jun 2016 #172
Yeah, Cilizza is a bit too opinionated, that's for sure. randome Jun 2016 #174
Chris Cilizza always makes my skin crawl on MSNBC Armstead Jun 2016 #176
There is a reason Elizabeth Warren is enthusiastically endorsing and campaigning for Hillary Haveadream Jun 2016 #177
It's a systemic problem that she is part and parcel of Armstead Jun 2016 #188
A systemic problem is made so by its parts Haveadream Jun 2016 #217
When do people like those asshole "journalists" ever discuss the "parts"? Armstead Jun 2016 #219
The media will always go for the lowest common denominator they can get away with Haveadream Jun 2016 #222
Well, Bernie may be simplistic inj his message....but that's neceessary at this point Armstead Jun 2016 #231
Here's a question about the Sanders campain keeps bugging me hollowdweller Jun 2016 #180
Whatever Uponthegears Jun 2016 #183
And WaPo has been amazingly condescending toward Sanders all campaign. Svafa Jun 2016 #206
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #209
For real. Chris Cillizza needs to get over himself. Svafa Jun 2016 #215
I missed the "amazingly condescending" part. Miles Archer Jun 2016 #220
That's because the "amazingly condescending" part doesn't exist. arcane1 Jun 2016 #228
It is condescending in that he will not acknowledge the fact that Hillary upaloopa Jun 2016 #229
Still biting the hand that feeds him, cloaked in invincible self-righteousness.... Hekate Jun 2016 #225
Again, tabloid nonsense runaway hero Jun 2016 #232
Thanks for getting to the heart of the matter Vattel Jun 2016 #241
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»WaPo: "Bernie Sanders jus...»Reply #31