Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
49. The question isn't "should we" but "how will we"
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 07:14 AM
Jun 2016

Of course we should. Anyone who disagrees doesn't know the history of electricity in this country and what it did for our economy and way of life.

But, as I posted above and in a different thread, the devil is in the details. In order to accomplish this vision, we must break the stranglehold corporations have over our infrastructure (yes, broadband is infrastructure). Those corporations make all their profit on the current system. When they look at all of us using something other than their velvet chains, they will fight it.

President Obama promised this same thing and then bumped up against the corporations. Those same corporations that were handed the keys to the gov't by Reagan. Ironic that Reagan broke up AT&T.

Repeated from above:


The President’s Executive Order establishing US Ignite came out two-plus years after the FCC introduced the National Broadband Plan (NBP). The goal of the plan is ambitious:

“The United States must lead the world in the number of homes and people with access to affordable, world-class broadband connections. As such, 100 million U.S. homes should have affordable access to actual download speeds of at least 100 Mbps and actual upload speeds of at least 50 Mbps by 2020. This will create the world’s most attractive market for broadband applications, devices and infrastructure.”

...

US Ignite points in the right direction, an effort to build-out the nation’s wireline infrastructure. But his well-intentioned and farsighted effort confronts, head-on, the nation’s telecom giants, the telephone and cable companies led by AT&T, Verizon, throw in Comcast and the other cable companies, who have a very different and self-serving agenda. Working together they are a ‘Communications Trust’, a cartel of companies who have taken control of communications so that they can get rid of regulations, raise rates and block competition.

But the real story is the massive skunkworks campaigns on both the state level, such as what happening in state legislatures, and at the federal level, including the FCC and Congress, to close down all wired services, including the Public Switched Telephone Networks, (PSTN) or DSL service, (which relies on the copper wiring) or even the obligation to provide wireline services in rural areas or where ever they don’t want to serve. At the same time, Verizon and AT&T have been privatizing other parts of the PSTN, such as the advanced services like FiOS or U-Verse, or the profitable business or data services, which use the PSTN wires and plant —- which have been directly funded by phone customers, many times through rate increases for ‘infrastructure’ building.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bruce-kushnick/broadband-communications-att-verizon_b_1621871.html
Sounds kinda good? Orsino Jun 2016 #1
+1 SpareribSP Jun 2016 #43
Municipally owned broadband! Faster, cheaper. nt. My Good Babushka Jun 2016 #2
This is what I want. Congress legislates and Hortensis Jun 2016 #12
Supremacy clause. seabeckind Jun 2016 #33
Has that been already determined legally to rule in Hortensis Jun 2016 #36
It's interesting how now some smaller towns have much better/faster/cheaper broadband obamanut2012 Jun 2016 #51
Never happen and this is maybe the third MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #3
Don't understand why "they" can do all this Hortensis Jun 2016 #13
I believe there was an attempt a while back seabeckind Jun 2016 #48
The US was supposed to be MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #55
Maybe I'm not seeing a correllation, cyberpunk Jun 2016 #4
See the black box? See the white box? Imagine Hortensis Jun 2016 #17
That's nice. Maybe, by 2020, we could also arrange for every American to have food. Vinca Jun 2016 #5
Winner Winner Winner pangaia Jun 2016 #8
Funny, you never said that in threads about BS's plan for free tuition. Innnnteresting... Squinch Jun 2016 #10
Bernie's plan included free meals!!!! JoePhilly Jun 2016 #15
Ah! Of course. My mistake. Squinch Jun 2016 #19
Hillary Offers Free Speechs to Goldman Sacks! Chasstev365 Jun 2016 #26
oooohh you sure gave it back good! Her Sister Jun 2016 #53
one does not exclude the other.nt. drray23 Jun 2016 #28
Four years? That's not even remotely realistic. bluedigger Jun 2016 #6
You could make lots of progress on this in 4 years. JoePhilly Jun 2016 #16
Too bold you say? Now all of the sudden "incrementalism" is called for? Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #20
This is kind of fascinating, isn't it? Squinch Jun 2016 #29
It's a real puzzler, Squinch :-) Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #30
"Can't do" Her Sister Jun 2016 #54
Great idea, but it will never happen. pangaia Jun 2016 #7
It can and will. Most American households Hortensis Jun 2016 #18
There is broadband and then there is broadband. pangaia Jun 2016 #21
I understand. We're in the same boat. One Hortensis Jun 2016 #23
How will she carry through on her promise? pangaia Jun 2016 #31
The usual, I imagine. We don't think private power Hortensis Jun 2016 #37
Obama said same thing 8 years ago Backwoodsrider Jun 2016 #9
Same bucket here, even though a nice fat pipe runs right in front of my house. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #22
This is how Internet speed and price in the U.S. compares to the rest of the world Human101948 Jun 2016 #11
I sincerely hope they can make this a priority. Native American areas have been particularly synergie Jun 2016 #14
Also too. FREE OVERWATCH. DemFromPittsburgh Jun 2016 #24
Leaked? (Intentionally?) NurseJackie Jun 2016 #25
What about competition? Net Neutrality yes. George Eliot Jun 2016 #27
Comcast/TWC and Verizon are NOT going to give up their guns without a bloody fight. pangaia Jun 2016 #32
Corporations are a piece of paper filed in a gov't office. seabeckind Jun 2016 #34
You sure know more about it than I do. pangaia Jun 2016 #35
I'm for that. Some times a little personal attention is all you have. George Eliot Jun 2016 #41
Pieces of Paper! Yes. Why don't people get that? George Eliot Jun 2016 #39
The more high speed internet spreads Urchin Jun 2016 #38
There are always new jobs in technology. George Eliot Jun 2016 #40
Who says? Urchin Jul 2016 #56
Post removed Post removed Jun 2016 #42
Priorities redixdoragon Jun 2016 #44
I agree with your priorities BainsBane Jun 2016 #45
I'd rather they had an affordable education and healthcare first. cherokeeprogressive Jun 2016 #46
specifics and stronger words Locrian Jun 2016 #47
The question isn't "should we" but "how will we" seabeckind Jun 2016 #49
Addendum. Comcast is bigger now. seabeckind Jun 2016 #50
A promise that is realistic and deliverable cosmicone Jun 2016 #52
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton Wants Eve...»Reply #49