Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mvymvy

(309 posts)
12. We are already 61% of the way to every vote equal
Mon Aug 1, 2016, 02:39 PM
Aug 2016

By changing state winner-take-all laws (not mentioned in the U.S. Constitution, but later enacted by 48 states), without changing anything in the Constitution, using the built-in method that the Constitution provides for states to make changes, the National Popular Vote bill is 61% of the way to guaranteeing the presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in the country.

Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in every presidential election. No more distorting and divisive red and blue state maps of pre-determined outcomes. There would no longer be a handful of 'battleground' states (where the two major political parties happen to have similar levels of support among voters) where voters and policies are more important than those of the voters in 38+ predictable states that have just been 'spectators' and ignored after the conventions.

The bill would take effect when enacted by states with a majority of the electoral votes—270 of 538.
All of the presidential electors from the enacting states will be supporters of the presidential candidate receiving the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC)—thereby guaranteeing that candidate with an Electoral College majority.

The bill has passed 34 state legislative chambers in 23 rural, small, medium, large, red, blue, and purple states with 261 electoral votes. The bill has been enacted by 11 small, medium, and large jurisdictions with 165 electoral votes – 61% of the 270 necessary to go into effect.

National Popular Vote

I'd be all in for who gets the most votes. redstateblues Aug 2016 #1
Are you just making things up? montex Aug 2016 #2
I guess that would fall into the category of every vote counts. Tough to get states like NY, TX and floriduck Aug 2016 #3
Just the opposite, actually... Wounded Bear Aug 2016 #5
That just means some states have greater population with fewer EC votes. Maybe NY, TX and CA? floriduck Aug 2016 #10
24 of 27 smallest states are politically irrelevant mvymvy Aug 2016 #13
Wyoming...they gave us Dick Cheney! nt MADem Aug 2016 #15
New York and California have enacted the National Popular Vote bill mvymvy Aug 2016 #11
That's my theory too lapfog_1 Aug 2016 #4
No way. The Constitution is very clear and unambiguous... Wounded Bear Aug 2016 #6
yeah, I thought Bush v. Gore was pretty clear too. - n/t lapfog_1 Aug 2016 #8
Different situation entirely from the proposed scenario... Wounded Bear Aug 2016 #9
Ronald Reagan did the same thing--the idea is to get out the RACIST vote. MADem Aug 2016 #16
If it leads to the EC getting replaced by direct presidential elections, I can live with that. Ken Burch Aug 2016 #7
We are already 61% of the way to every vote equal mvymvy Aug 2016 #12
Thanks to the update on that. n/t. Ken Burch Aug 2016 #14
Democrats fought against a Republican advantage for many years John Poet Aug 2016 #17
That only works if they win the popular vote...no sign of that happening. brooklynite Aug 2016 #18
I have been thinking along the same lines Kathy M Aug 2016 #19
It has started ..... Trump in Ohio today Kathy M Aug 2016 #20
The best lines he has he stole from Sanders.... The GOP ain't helping him, lol. bettyellen Aug 2016 #22
Is that a bad thing? NobodyHere Aug 2016 #21
True ... I voted for Gore :) Kathy M Aug 2016 #23
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»They're going to try to d...»Reply #12