Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
9. Yes. Dukakis had about a 17 point lead just after the D convention (or possibly just before).
Thu Aug 4, 2016, 09:10 PM
Aug 2016

GHW Bush then had a good convention and went on the attack, attacks that weren't answered.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Dukakis#1988_presidential_campaign

Dukakis himself blames his defeat on the time he spent doing gubernatorial work in Massachusetts during the few weeks following the Democratic Convention. Many believed he should have been campaigning across the country. During this time, his 17-point lead in opinion polls completely disappeared, as his lack of visibility allowed Bush to define the issues of the campaign. Dukakis has since stated that the main reason he lost was his decision "not to respond to the Bush attack campaign, and in retrospect it was a pretty dumb decision."
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary should just go ho...»Reply #9