Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Showing Original Post only (View all)

StrictlyRockers

(3,855 posts)
Sat Aug 13, 2016, 04:57 PM Aug 2016

Nate Silver of 538.com speculates on what a huge Clinton landslide would look like [View all]

http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/what-a-clinton-landslide-would-look-like/?ex_cid=2016-forecast

What A Clinton Landslide Would Look Like
By Nate Silver
AUG 12, 2016 AT 1:40 PM

<...>

But there’s another possibility staring us right in the face: A potential Hillary Clinton landslide. Our polls-only model projects Clinton to win the election by 7.7 percentage points, about the same margin by which Barack Obama beat John McCain in 2008. And it assigns a 35 percent chance to Clinton winning by double digits.

Our other model, polls-plus, is much more conservative about Clinton’s prospects. If this were an ordinary election, the smart money would be on the race tightening down the stretch run, and coming more into line with economic “fundamentals” that suggest the election ought to be close. Since this is how the polls-plus model “thinks,” it projects Clinton to win by around 4 points, about the margin by which Obama beat Mitt Romney in 2012 — a solid victory but a long way from a landslide.

<...>

Perhaps the strongest evidence for a potential landslide against Trump is in the state-by-state polling, which has shown him underperforming in any number of traditionally Republican states. It’s not just Georgia and Arizona, where polls have shown a fairly close race all year. At various points, polls have shown Clinton drawing within a few percentage points of Trump — and occasionally even leading him — in states such as Utah, South Carolina, Texas, Alaska, Kansas and even Mississippi.

Just how bad could it get? Let’s start by giving Clinton the 332 electoral votes that Obama won in 2012. That’s obviously not a safe assumption: The race could shift back toward Trump, and even if it doesn’t, Clinton could lose states such as Iowa or Nevada, where her polling has been middling even after her convention bounce. But as I said, we’re going to focus on Clinton’s upside case today.

<...>










Ok, that is fun and interesting. Thanks, Nate. Now back to working hard to get Hillary elected, running THROUGH the finish line and pushing for a progressive agenda.
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chris Matthews yesterday was talking about "big losses" question everything Aug 2016 #1
The voters need to say to Trump... liberal N proud Aug 2016 #3
He's so fired. StrictlyRockers Aug 2016 #12
I love the 16 point map TexasTowelie Aug 2016 #2
I love it, too! StrictlyRockers Aug 2016 #5
i like scenario 3.nt. drray23 Aug 2016 #4
I just **** Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #6
#ElectionPorn StrictlyRockers Aug 2016 #7
its this bad............ MFM008 Aug 2016 #8
Thanks a lot there's an image I could have done without. jcgoldie Aug 2016 #9
I know MFM008 Aug 2016 #11
It is helpful! CobaltBlue Aug 2016 #10
This is wonderful stuff, but we need to act as if it won't happen. Complacency is failure. ancianita Aug 2016 #13
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Nate Silver of 538.com sp...»Reply #0