Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Wikileaks "evidence" would not be allowed in a court of law. [View all]AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)62. Wikileaks doesn't have anything on Trump that is more controversial than the balls-out crazy shit
that comes directly from Trump's mouth every time he gets in front of a camera.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/293453-assange-wikileaks-trump-info-no-worse-than-him
And that's not exactly an endorsement of Trump. That's another point that shows he's just as fucking crazy as he sounds.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
'Any illegally obtained evidence is considered poisoned fruit.' - That's not true.
PoliticAverse
Oct 2016
#2
An exception. The issue of concern was identified prior to obtaining documents. .
FarPoint
Oct 2016
#9
It's never been confirmed it was the Russians. I'm still waiting for confirmation.
JRLeft
Oct 2016
#27
Wikileaks doesn't have anything on Trump that is more controversial than the balls-out crazy shit
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2016
#62
Hey man, keep that shit to a dull roar. We're trying to kill the messenger here.
AtheistCrusader
Oct 2016
#65