Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)

4. Well, Hillary and Trump were functionally equivalent on the stump, ie "let states decide".

Reply to stevenleser (Original post)

Sun Dec 4, 2016, 02:42 AM

Dec 2016

Now, it's pretty damn apparent to those of us on the West Coast that the Eastern Seaboard is behind the curve on this issue, but not by much, as witnessed by Mass. and Maine.

It remains to be seen what Sessions will do. He may be focused on immigration, which is Trump's signature issue. Trump may not want to expend a ton of political capital going after weed, when it enjoys bipartisan support and there are lots of Republicans, from Rand Paul to Dana Rorbacher, who take a more libertarian approach on it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I heard some folks say Hillary wasn't pro-Pot enough. Well, say hello to AG Sessions [View all] stevenleser Dec 2016 OP

The genie is out of the bottle on dope, I think Auggie Dec 2016 #1

My concern is he will usher in the corporate takeover NWCorona Dec 2016 #2

Yeah, that's where I see this going. (n/t) SMC22307 Dec 2016 #6

Trump Tokes...nt SidDithers Dec 2016 #13

The beer and pharmaceutical industries will absolutely love that fucking asshole Sessions mtnsnake Dec 2016 #3

Well, Hillary and Trump were functionally equivalent on the stump, ie "let states decide". Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #4

Nope, people have to be smarter than that, as you can see the end result stevenleser Dec 2016 #7

You seem to be arguing with phantom people who didn't actually vote for Hillary. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #9

Nope, I'm arguing re: people who said there was functionally no difference, like you just did. nt stevenleser Dec 2016 #11

I'm not going to play one of these "bad internet arguments" games, Steve. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #12

And I am saying people have to be smarter than that and use history as a guide. stevenleser Dec 2016 #17

I'm all for people being smarter. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #20

Would you acknowledge that maybe DWS was a real problem for our party in Florida? Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #5

Nope, people not learning from the past was the issue for our party stevenleser Dec 2016 #8

You're having a conversation with yourself, which bears no resemblance to anything I asked. Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #10

I know that is your argument, and once again, anyone thinking that way should have known stevenleser Dec 2016 #16

Who do you think I voted for, Steve? Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #18

Why do you insist in thinking this is about you or how I think you voted? This is broader than that. stevenleser Dec 2016 #19

Yes, it's about fighting imaginary battles against "some folks", most of whom aren't even on this Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #21

This entire forum is about that battle and that "DU primary fighting goodness" stevenleser Dec 2016 #22

No, I haven't seen any evidence that it was insufficiently enthused Sanders weed people Warren DeMontague Dec 2016 #23

Hillary wasn't perfect on every issue mcar Dec 2016 #14

Yep, and here we are. nt stevenleser Dec 2016 #15