Nope, people have to be smarter than that, as you can see the end result (Reply #7)

In the discussion thread: I heard some folks say Hillary wasn't pro-Pot enough. Well, say hello to AG Sessions [View all]

Response to Warren DeMontague (Reply #4)

Sun Dec 4, 2016, 09:38 AM

stevenleser (32,886 posts)

7. Nope, people have to be smarter than that, as you can see the end result

Last edited Sun Dec 4, 2016, 10:55 AM - Edit history (1)

We had similar results with Gore and Nader re: Bush.

Nader: "Gore and Bush are functionally the SAME re: X, Y, and Z...!!!11!!11!!11"

Oh no they weren't.

And no Hillary and Trump aren't.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

23 replies	Author	Time	Post
I heard some folks say Hillary wasn't pro-Pot enough. Well, say hello to AG Sessions [View all]	stevenleser	Dec 2016	OP
The genie is out of the bottle on dope, I think	Auggie	Dec 2016	#1
My concern is he will usher in the corporate takeover	NWCorona	Dec 2016	#2
Yeah, that's where I see this going. (n/t)	SMC22307	Dec 2016	#6
Trump Tokes...nt	SidDithers	Dec 2016	#13
The beer and pharmaceutical industries will absolutely love that fucking asshole Sessions	mtnsnake	Dec 2016	#3
Well, Hillary and Trump were functionally equivalent on the stump, ie "let states decide".	Warren DeMontague	Dec 2016	#4
Nope, people have to be smarter than that, as you can see the end result	stevenleser	Dec 2016	#7
You seem to be arguing with phantom people who didn't actually vote for Hillary.	Warren DeMontague	Dec 2016	#9
Nope, I'm arguing re: people who said there was functionally no difference, like you just did. nt	stevenleser	Dec 2016	#11
I'm not going to play one of these "bad internet arguments" games, Steve.	Warren DeMontague	Dec 2016	#12
And I am saying people have to be smarter than that and use history as a guide.	stevenleser	Dec 2016	#17
I'm all for people being smarter.	Warren DeMontague	Dec 2016	#20
Would you acknowledge that maybe DWS was a real problem for our party in Florida?	Warren DeMontague	Dec 2016	#5
Nope, people not learning from the past was the issue for our party	stevenleser	Dec 2016	#8
You're having a conversation with yourself, which bears no resemblance to anything I asked.	Warren DeMontague	Dec 2016	#10
I know that is your argument, and once again, anyone thinking that way should have known	stevenleser	Dec 2016	#16
Who do you think I voted for, Steve?	Warren DeMontague	Dec 2016	#18
Why do you insist in thinking this is about you or how I think you voted? This is broader than that.	stevenleser	Dec 2016	#19
Yes, it's about fighting imaginary battles against "some folks", most of whom aren't even on this	Warren DeMontague	Dec 2016	#21
This entire forum is about that battle and that "DU primary fighting goodness"	stevenleser	Dec 2016	#22
No, I haven't seen any evidence that it was insufficiently enthused Sanders weed people	Warren DeMontague	Dec 2016	#23
Hillary wasn't perfect on every issue	mcar	Dec 2016	#14
Yep, and here we are. nt	stevenleser	Dec 2016	#15

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.