HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Retired » Retired Forums » 2016 Postmortem (Forum) » I grew up in a very red, ... » Reply #161

Response to LiberalLovinLug (Reply #159)

Tue Jan 3, 2017, 01:16 PM

161. The DNC had nothing to do with the fact that Jewish, African American and Latino voters rejected

Sanders. This claim is wrong http://www.newsweek.com/myths-cost-democrats-presidential-election-521044

Easily the most ridiculous argument this year was that the DNC was some sort of monolith that orchestrated the nomination of Hillary Clinton against the will of “the people.” This was immensely popular with the Bernie-or-Busters, those who declared themselves unwilling to vote for Clinton under any circumstances because the Democratic primary had been rigged (and how many of these people laughed when Trump started moaning about election rigging?). The notion that the fix was in was stupid, as were the people who believed it.

Start with this: The DNC, just like the Republican National Committee, is an impotent organization with very little power. It is composed of the chair and vice chair of the Democratic parties of each state, along with over 200 members elected by Democrats. What it does is fundraise, organize the Democratic National Convention and put together the party platform. It handles some organizational activity but tries to hold down its expenditures during the primaries; it has no authority to coordinate spending with any candidate until the party’s nominee is selected. This was why then-President Richard Nixon reacted with incredulity when he heard that some of his people had ordered a break-in at the DNC offices at the Watergate; he couldn’t figure out what information anyone would want out of such a toothless organization.....

According to a Western European intelligence source, Russian hackers, using a series of go-betweens, transmitted the DNC emails to WikiLeaks with the intent of having them released on the verge of the Democratic Convention in hopes of sowing chaos. And that’s what happened—just a couple of days before Democrats gathered in Philadelphia, the emails came out, and suddenly the media was loaded with stories about trauma in the party. Crews of Russian propagandists—working through an array of Twitter accounts and websites, started spreading the story that the DNC had stolen the election from Sanders. (An analysis provided to Newsweek by independent internet and computer specialists using a series of algorithms show that this kind of propaganda, using the same words, went from Russian disinformation sources to comment sections on more than 200 sites catering to liberals, conservatives, white supremacists, nutritionists and an amazing assortment of other interest groups.) The fact that the dates of the most controversial emails—May 3, May 4, May 5, May 9, May 16, May 17, May 18, May 21—were after it was impossible for Sanders to win was almost never mentioned, and was certainly ignored by the propagandists trying to sell the “primaries were rigged” narrative. (Yes, one of them said something inappropriate about his religious beliefs. So a guy inside the DNC was a jerk; that didn’t change the outcome.) Two other emails—one from April 24 and May 1—were statements of fact. In the first, responding to Sanders saying he would push for a contested convention (even though he would not have the delegates to do so), a DNC official wrote, “So much for a traditional presumptive nominee.” Yeah, no kidding. The second stated that Sanders didn’t know what the DNC’s job actually was—which he didn’t, apparently because he had not ever been a Democrat before his run.

Bottom line: The “scandalous” DNC emails were hacked by people working with the Kremlin, then misrepresented online by Russian propagandists to gullible fools who never checked the dates of the documents. And the media, which in the flurry of breathless stories about the emails would occasionally mention that they were all dated after any rational person knew the nomination was Clinton’s, fed into the misinformation.

In the real world, here is what happened: Clinton got 16.9 million votes in the primaries, compared with 13.2 million for Sanders. The rules were never changed to stop him, even though Sanders supporters started calling for them to be changed as his losses piled up.

I was a delegate to the national convention and I saw much of this silliness first hand. This election was winnable but the sanders campaign did a great deal of damage that is the subject of valid commentary

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 163 replies Author Time Post
yardwork Dec 2016 OP
guillaumeb Dec 2016 #1
yardwork Dec 2016 #3
Name removed Dec 2016 #9
yardwork Dec 2016 #14
oasis Dec 2016 #28
Name removed Dec 2016 #31
oasis Dec 2016 #37
calimary Dec 2016 #105
Angry Dragon Dec 2016 #96
Hoyt Dec 2016 #2
yardwork Dec 2016 #4
Hoyt Dec 2016 #6
yardwork Dec 2016 #7
Hunter Rose Dec 2016 #87
Phoenix61 Dec 2016 #5
yardwork Dec 2016 #8
Dustlawyer Dec 2016 #43
InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2016 #82
Locrian Dec 2016 #86
lunatica Dec 2016 #109
calimary Dec 2016 #108
Phoenix61 Dec 2016 #116
radical noodle Dec 2016 #118
calimary Dec 2016 #129
radical noodle Jan 2017 #135
calimary Jan 2017 #150
radical noodle Jan 2017 #151
kimbutgar Dec 2016 #10
betsuni Dec 2016 #11
The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #12
yardwork Dec 2016 #13
The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #15
yardwork Dec 2016 #17
The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #20
yardwork Dec 2016 #22
JHan Dec 2016 #30
The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #32
JHan Dec 2016 #40
Canoe52 Dec 2016 #48
The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #50
LuckyLib Dec 2016 #57
ehrnst Dec 2016 #90
SunSeeker Dec 2016 #99
ehrnst Dec 2016 #124
dsc Dec 2016 #132
ehrnst Jan 2017 #145
StevieM Dec 2016 #46
whathehell Dec 2016 #102
DURHAM D Dec 2016 #18
yardwork Dec 2016 #19
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #34
Crash2Parties Dec 2016 #21
KingCharlemagne Dec 2016 #59
brush Dec 2016 #91
Crash2Parties Dec 2016 #130
whathehell Dec 2016 #84
brush Dec 2016 #92
whathehell Dec 2016 #97
Crash2Parties Dec 2016 #131
whathehell Jan 2017 #136
Gothmog Dec 2016 #106
mopinko Dec 2016 #53
tammywammy Dec 2016 #121
herding cats Dec 2016 #16
not fooled Dec 2016 #52
Cha Dec 2016 #66
zentrum Dec 2016 #23
yardwork Dec 2016 #24
Cha Dec 2016 #67
progressoid Dec 2016 #27
The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #29
NanceGreggs Dec 2016 #36
Cha Dec 2016 #69
La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #45
zentrum Dec 2016 #47
La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #49
brush Dec 2016 #94
zentrum Dec 2016 #113
brush Dec 2016 #126
milestogo Dec 2016 #25
yardwork Dec 2016 #26
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #33
The Velveteen Ocelot Dec 2016 #39
Fast Walker 52 Dec 2016 #41
PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2016 #35
lancelyons Dec 2016 #38
DawgHouse Dec 2016 #42
IronLionZion Dec 2016 #44
Oldtimeralso Dec 2016 #55
Tumbulu Dec 2016 #51
George II Dec 2016 #54
C Moon Dec 2016 #56
Willie Pep Dec 2016 #58
KingCharlemagne Dec 2016 #61
yardwork Jan 2017 #143
MrScorpio Dec 2016 #60
Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #62
ailsagirl Dec 2016 #63
LaydeeBug Dec 2016 #64
Cha Dec 2016 #65
Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #70
Cha Dec 2016 #72
Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #73
Cha Dec 2016 #74
Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #75
Cha Dec 2016 #80
Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #81
StevieM Jan 2017 #144
Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #78
not fooled Dec 2016 #100
Buckeye_Democrat Dec 2016 #101
Gothmog Dec 2016 #127
R B Garr Dec 2016 #68
R B Garr Dec 2016 #71
Hekate Dec 2016 #77
dionysus Dec 2016 #79
La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #83
Gothmog Dec 2016 #133
Gothmog Jan 2017 #134
dionysus Jan 2017 #149
R B Garr Jan 2017 #146
Jamaal510 Dec 2016 #76
hamsterjill Dec 2016 #85
blue cat Dec 2016 #88
ehrnst Dec 2016 #89
TNNurse Dec 2016 #93
BlueMTexpat Dec 2016 #95
andym Dec 2016 #98
Eliot Rosewater Dec 2016 #103
brer cat Dec 2016 #104
Gothmog Dec 2016 #107
LiberalLovinLug Dec 2016 #114
Gothmog Dec 2016 #120
LiberalLovinLug Dec 2016 #123
Gothmog Dec 2016 #128
LiberalLovinLug Jan 2017 #142
Gothmog Jan 2017 #153
LiberalLovinLug Jan 2017 #154
Gothmog Jan 2017 #157
Gothmog Jan 2017 #158
LiberalLovinLug Jan 2017 #159
Gothmog Jan 2017 #160
LiberalLovinLug Jan 2017 #162
Gothmog Jan 2017 #163
LineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineLineNew Reply The DNC had nothing to do with the fact that Jewish, African American and Latino voters rejected
Gothmog Jan 2017 #161
dreamland Dec 2016 #110
sammcgee68 Dec 2016 #111
LiberalLovinLug Dec 2016 #112
yardwork Dec 2016 #117
n2doc Dec 2016 #119
mtnsnake Jan 2017 #138
yardwork Jan 2017 #141
CousinIT Dec 2016 #115
DeminPennswoods Dec 2016 #122
radical noodle Dec 2016 #125
mtnsnake Jan 2017 #137
yardwork Jan 2017 #140
yardwork Jan 2017 #139
Goblinmonger Jan 2017 #147
yardwork Jan 2017 #148
ellie Jan 2017 #152
libdem4life Jan 2017 #155
Rex Jan 2017 #156
Please login to view edit histories.